The Afghan Vacuum: India’s Hybrid War Against Pakistan

The Afghan Vacuum: India’s Hybrid War Against Pakistan

A country is more than just land, it is a strategic space. When a state hollows out, as Afghanistan has through decades of invasion, civil war, and instability, that space does not remain empty for long. It becomes a vacuum, drawing in the ambitions and agendas of regional powers. For decades, India has leveraged this Afghan vacuum. Evidence suggests a systematic effort to utilize Afghan territory as a forward base for a sophisticated hybrid war aimed at destabilizing Pakistan, a strategy that has adapted to the shifting political landscapes of the last forty years by consistently exploiting the core weakness of the Afghan state itself.

The Cold War Precedent

The playbook for this strategy has historical roots. During the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan from 1979 to 1989, India adopted a stance supportive of the Soviet-backed Kabul government. This was a calculated move that created a strategic pincer against Pakistan. This era established a clear precedent for using Afghan territory as a staging ground. It became a sanctuary for anti-Pakistan groups, including the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA), which received training and support, demonstrating how a friendly or dependent government in Kabul could be used to project influence and pressure onto Pakistan.

The Post-2001 Theater: Consulates and Chaos

This strategy was refined and expanded in the post-9/11 era. Between 2001 and 2021, following the fall of the first Taliban regime, India launched a major diplomatic and economic offensive under the guise of reconstruction. It became the largest regional aid donor, funding high-profile projects like the new Afghan Parliament and the Salma Dam. This soft power approach was underpinned by a significant physical footprint: a large embassy in Kabul and four consulates in the strategic cities of Herat, Kandahar, Jalalabad, and Mazar-i-Sharif.

A State in Transition and Renewed Proxy Warfare

A Call to Dismantle the Theater of War

From the Soviet era to the current Taliban regime, Afghanistan has remained a theater for a long and damaging shadow war. While the methods have evolved, the underlying motive has remained unchanged. This reality poses a grave threat that extends far beyond the region. A state still struggling to establish control, used as a battleground for proxy wars, will inevitably export terror, narcotics, and instability. Therefore, it is incumbent upon the international community to recognize this danger and focus its efforts on fostering a stable Afghan state that possesses the capacity to finally govern its own territory and pressure India to cease its nefarious activities that risk the growth and peace of the entire region. Until the world works to dismantle this theater of war, the shadow of conflict will continue to loom over the entire region and beyond.

SAT Editorial Desk

Your go-to editorial hub for policy perspectives and informed analysis on pressing regional and global issues.

Recent

Between Security and Privacy: Contextualizing Amnesty’s Claims on Pakistan’s Surveillance

Between Security and Privacy: Contextualizing Amnesty’s Claims on Pakistan’s Surveillance

Amnesty International’s Shadows of Control paints a bleak picture of Pakistan’s digital surveillance. Yet by sidelining the country’s acute security challenges, dismissing existing legal safeguards, and overlooking its own credibility issues, the report offers a partial and misleading narrative. A more balanced approach requires situating surveillance within Pakistan’s counterterrorism imperatives and recognizing the global double standards at play.

Read More »
The End of Liberal Internationalism? America’s Retreat into Realism

The End of Liberal Internationalism? Trump’s New Realism

Donald Trump’s address to the UN General Assembly marked a sharp break from America’s seven-decade stewardship of the liberal international order. Rooted in realist principles, his speech rejected multilateralism, attacked the UN’s legitimacy, and reframed alliances as transactional bargains. From immigration and climate policy to NATO and Middle East conflicts, Trump outlined a vision of unilateral power and national sovereignty that directly challenges the institutional foundations of global governance.

Read More »
Colonial Legacies of Bombay and Calcutta

Colonial Legacies of Bombay and Calcutta

Bombay and Calcutta were more than colonial capitals, they embodied imperial urban planning, economic integration, and cultural hybridity. From segregated ‘white’ and ‘black’ towns to thriving ports, industries, and nationalist thought, these cities reveal how British rule reshaped India’s urban life while leaving enduring legacies still visible today.

Read More »