Terrorism in Pakistan: The Indo-Iran Nexus

Image Credits: Reuters

Pakistan has long been riven by internal strife, with terrorism emerging as the most serious threat to its domestic security in recent years. In addition to local factors that have contributed to the emergence of various terrorist groups, the evidence of a foreign hand is too substantial to disregard. Scholars have discussed the proactive role of foreign governments in training, arming, and providing additional logistical and intelligence support as well as a safe haven to an otherwise independent terrorist group to carry out violent acts on their behalf against their adversaries. In this view, it is crucial to account for state-sponsored terrorism in Pakistan masquerading as insurgencies with widespread support.

Terrorism: The Many Faces

In Pakistan, the international community has witnessed neighboring countries bolstering ethno-centric terrorist groups with their support. In neighboring nations, we frequently hear of Indian support for groups that are conveniently portrayed as “insurgents.” Despite Iran’s repeated assertions of its commitment to counterterrorism, the policymakers of Pakistan and Afghanistan remain wary of Iran’s reluctance to effectively address the presence of ethno-nationalist and religious terrorist networks within its borders.

Recently, renowned journalist and anchor Zarrar Khuhro published an article in The Independent in which he emphasized Iran’s covert support for the Sindhudesh Revolutionary Army (SRA), which emerged as a security threat in 2010. In addition, this article highlights the tragic demise of Rana Sakhawat Rajput, an active member of the Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) from the district of Qambar Shahad Kot, who was killed by the SRA in November 2021, followed by a bombing in Karachi’s Saddar area in 2022.

Security analysts attribute the SRA’s ascendance in launching ambushes in urban settings to India’s covert support for this organization using Iranian soil as a launchpad.

It is not the first time that India’s role in fomenting terrorist factions has been revealed; however, the infamous Kao Plan is a documented example of India employing a tripartite strategy for infiltrating Pakistan’s population with “insurgencies.” The three pillars of the Kao Plan’s implementation are the separation of East and West Pakistan, the instigation of terrorism in Balochistan and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, and the eventual achievement of independence for these provinces. Nonetheless, supporting a Sindh-based insurgent group is an addition to the Kao Plan’s initial three pillars.

Iran, and the Kao Plan

Realistically, implementing the Kao Plan on the ground would have been nearly impossible without the support of Afghanistan and Iran. The Indian security apparatus is thus using Iranian territory to bolster the terrorist groups operating in Balochistan. According to reports, the majority of militant organizations, including the Baloch Liberation Front (BLF) and the Baloch Liberation Army (BLA), have a presence in the Iranian province of Sistan-Baluchestan, which borders Pakistan. As a result, after being ambushed in Pakistan, militants flee to Iran. The Kech and Panjgur regions, which are close to the Iranian border, were among the hardest hit by terrorist groups in Balochistan between January and December 2021, according to a 2021 security assessment from the Pakistan Institute for Peace Research.

Notably, Indian support for the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) and other like-minded groups operating in Balochistan through Iran came into the spotlight when Kulbushan Jhadav was incarcerated in the province.

In response, Iran’s Ambassador to Pakistan Mehdi Honardoost at the time said, “It is for the first time that before being discussed between security authorities of the two countries, an issue was leaked to the media.” This statement from an Iranian official confirms that Kalbushan Jhadev was brought into Pakistan from Iran.

Later, through a dossier, Pakistani officials, including former Foreign Minister Shah Mahmood Qureshi, demonstrated that India was fueling terrorism in Pakistan through Iran in order to form a consortium of terrorist groups operating in Balochistan. He added that “India is now trying to create a consortium of the TTP with proscribed dissident organizations of Balochistan—BLA, BLF, and BRA—which were already united under the banner of BRAS (Baloch Raaji Aajoie Sangar).”

Additionally, in a presser, the then DG of Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR), Babar Iftikhar, mentioned that “India had raised a 700-strong militia to sabotage CPEC by carrying out terrorist attacks in Balochistan.” “A commission comprising 24 members was created, which included 10 RAW operatives, and $60 million was dedicated to this force.”

A Double-Edged Sword

Given the evidence presented above, it is reasonable to conclude that Iranian authorities granted Indian intelligence operatives some leeway due to Iran’s reliance on India for oil trade.

Despite Iran’s history of supporting ethno-nationalist terrorist groups in Pakistan, such a strategy could be a double-edged sword.

This is because the Baloch people are spread across both sides of the border, which means that any such efforts may ultimately backfire. This was demonstrated in the 1970s when the Baloch population in Iran staged a revolt against their own government.

Lastly, in order to effectively address the terrorist threat in Pakistan, it is essential to carry out operations such as the “Ground Zero Clearance Operation” in the vicinity of Pakistan\’s borders with Iran.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own. They do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of the South Asia Times.

Deedar Karim

Deedar Karim, Research Fellow in counter-terrorism, BA & MPhil in International Relations, focused on regional security dynamics. He can be reached on X, formerly Twitter, via @Emperisist

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »