Saffron Vigilantism in Karnataka: Religious Bigotry

Saffron Vigilantism in Karnataka: Religious Bigotry

India, also known as the largest ‘Democracy’, is witnessing another wave of Saffron vigilantism against religious minorities.

The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) led government in India has been on the course of dividing India into religious lines. The phenomenon of hatred towards religious minorities, especially Muslims, is not entirely of the 21st century. The founding principle of the RSS by its founder, Keshav Baliram Hedgewar, was based on the “Hindutva” ideology. The aim of making India a Hindu Rashtra is the basis of Hindutva ideology and RSS since its inception.

Despite the fact, that the idea of fraternity has been included in the preamble of the Indian Constitution at BR Ambedkar’s insistence and the Articles 25 and 26 of the Indian Constitution establish to practice religion as a fundamental right, the Hindutva-led religious bigotry in India is recently being witnessed at unprecedented levels. Since Mr Narendra Modi has assumed office as Prime Minister of India in 2014, the country has witnessed increased discrimination against religious minorities. Muslims have remained the most affected religious minority in India; from cow vigilantes, boycotting Muslim businesses, vandalizing mosques to the recent ‘anti-hijab’ protests in Karnataka, the Muslims inside India are facing oppression at the hands of the Hindutva-led ideological government.

The recent vigilante incidents for Muslims are like unwanted nostalgia of Congress Ministries of 1937, under British rule in the Sub-continent.

But, what makes the recent Karnataka saffron vigilante incident even more sinister is the use of youth, mostly high-school-aged are becoming radicalized by the RSS-BJP led government. The saffron shawl worn by the high school girls in Karnataka’s Kundapur area protesting against hijab is evident of the growing radicalization of the Indian youth. These young girls were seen shouting slogans “Jai Shree Ram” in favor of the RSS-BJP led rules over the dress code of Muslim women students in India. Rather than standing by the side of their colleagues in solidarity, as a ‘Democratic’ nation would do, the girls are ascribing to the discriminatory actions based on religious bigotry.

According to an article published in New York Times, the Hindu extremism is being pushed ever more into the mainstream media. India is pushing itself towards a Hindu identity rather than a secular one.  The Indian claims of being a pluralist society are now itself under threat of being plural. The open calls for killings of “two-three million Muslims” by Yati Narsinghanand in a Hindu pilgrimage event should ring the alarm bells for the world community.

The increasing use of hate speech against Muslims in the mainstream media is evidence of either of the two things pertaining to the Modi government: acquiescence or support.

The recent saffron vigilantism in Karnataka is just the tip of the iceberg. With the might of all government machinery, against the mighty norms of ‘Democracy’, BJP has brought a new reign of terror over religious minorities.  Meanwhile, there have been dozens of reports on the impending genocide in India against the Muslims, Modi continues to look the other way. Whereas the world remains in shock over the Karnataka incident, there is another aspect to this discriminatory event, which is being neglected by the world media.

The Karnataka incident is not only a religious bigotry, but also an attack on the freedom of women rights.

This raises certain questions over the uneven handedness of the United States and the international community in dealing with India and Afghanistan. Now, that the religious persecution of Muslims in India has also taken the shape of infringing women rights, will the US and the international community be more proactive against India as compared to the interim government of Afghanistan? Or corporate and strategic interest will triumph over the highly celebrated democratic ideals of the international rules-based system?

SAT Editorial Desk

Your go-to editorial hub for policy perspectives and informed analysis on pressing regional and global issues.

Recent

Healthcare as Statecraft in Taliban-Ruled Afghanistan

Healthcare as Statecraft in Taliban-Ruled Afghanistan

Afghanistan’s recent shift away from Pakistani pharmaceutical imports toward Indian suppliers marks a dangerous transformation of healthcare into a tool of geopolitical signaling. Framed as regulatory reform, this pivot reflects a broader biopolitical strategy in which access to medicine is subordinated to diplomatic recalibration, with profound ethical and humanitarian consequences for an already vulnerable population.

Read More »
The Taliban Regime and the 2025 Global CFT Framework

The Taliban Regime and the 2025 Global CFT Framework

Despite consolidating internal control and boosting revenues, the Taliban remain structurally incompatible with the 2025 global Counter-Terrorism Financing regime, as sanctions, militant linkages, and gender persecution block financial reintegration.

Read More »
How Afghan Networks Sustain Terrorism in Pakistan

How Afghan Networks Sustain Terrorism in Pakistan

The December 2025 Boya suicide attack underscores the transnational nature of militancy confronting Pakistan. The identification of an Afghan national from Kabul as the attacker, and the public veneration he received there, reveals how recruitment pipelines, ideological legitimation, and porous borders continue to sustain insurgency in North Waziristan, placing growing strain on Pakistan–Taliban relations.

Read More »
Majoritarian Politics and the Erosion of Minority Dignity in India: The Bihar Hijab Incident

Majoritarian Politics and the Erosion of Minority Dignity in India: The Bihar Hijab Incident

The forcible removal of a Muslim woman doctor’s hijab by Bihar’s Chief Minister was not an isolated lapse of conduct but a revealing moment in India’s evolving political culture. It underscored how majoritarian ideology increasingly normalizes the public humiliation of minorities, particularly Muslim women, and weakens constitutional guarantees of equality, religious freedom, and personal dignity.

Read More »
Herat tragedy claims 30 lives, exposing Afghanistan’s governance failures, unsafe migration, and escalating humanitarian crisis.

Herat Border Tragedy: The Deadly Consequences of Afghanistan’s Governance Failures

The Herat border tragedy, is a stark illustration of the human cost of Afghanistan’s governance failures. With limited economic opportunities, widespread poverty, and insufficient social support, families are forced to undertake life-threatening journeys across freezing mountains. The incident underscores the urgent need for the Afghan government to provide stable livelihoods, establish safe migration routes, and strengthen healthcare and social services, as humanitarian risks continue to escalate across the country.

Read More »