Saffron Vigilantism in Karnataka: Religious Bigotry

Saffron Vigilantism in Karnataka: Religious Bigotry

India, also known as the largest ‘Democracy’, is witnessing another wave of Saffron vigilantism against religious minorities.

The Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and Bhartiya Janata Party (BJP) led government in India has been on the course of dividing India into religious lines. The phenomenon of hatred towards religious minorities, especially Muslims, is not entirely of the 21st century. The founding principle of the RSS by its founder, Keshav Baliram Hedgewar, was based on the “Hindutva” ideology. The aim of making India a Hindu Rashtra is the basis of Hindutva ideology and RSS since its inception.

Despite the fact, that the idea of fraternity has been included in the preamble of the Indian Constitution at BR Ambedkar’s insistence and the Articles 25 and 26 of the Indian Constitution establish to practice religion as a fundamental right, the Hindutva-led religious bigotry in India is recently being witnessed at unprecedented levels. Since Mr Narendra Modi has assumed office as Prime Minister of India in 2014, the country has witnessed increased discrimination against religious minorities. Muslims have remained the most affected religious minority in India; from cow vigilantes, boycotting Muslim businesses, vandalizing mosques to the recent ‘anti-hijab’ protests in Karnataka, the Muslims inside India are facing oppression at the hands of the Hindutva-led ideological government.

The recent vigilante incidents for Muslims are like unwanted nostalgia of Congress Ministries of 1937, under British rule in the Sub-continent.

But, what makes the recent Karnataka saffron vigilante incident even more sinister is the use of youth, mostly high-school-aged are becoming radicalized by the RSS-BJP led government. The saffron shawl worn by the high school girls in Karnataka’s Kundapur area protesting against hijab is evident of the growing radicalization of the Indian youth. These young girls were seen shouting slogans “Jai Shree Ram” in favor of the RSS-BJP led rules over the dress code of Muslim women students in India. Rather than standing by the side of their colleagues in solidarity, as a ‘Democratic’ nation would do, the girls are ascribing to the discriminatory actions based on religious bigotry.

According to an article published in New York Times, the Hindu extremism is being pushed ever more into the mainstream media. India is pushing itself towards a Hindu identity rather than a secular one.  The Indian claims of being a pluralist society are now itself under threat of being plural. The open calls for killings of “two-three million Muslims” by Yati Narsinghanand in a Hindu pilgrimage event should ring the alarm bells for the world community.

The increasing use of hate speech against Muslims in the mainstream media is evidence of either of the two things pertaining to the Modi government: acquiescence or support.

The recent saffron vigilantism in Karnataka is just the tip of the iceberg. With the might of all government machinery, against the mighty norms of ‘Democracy’, BJP has brought a new reign of terror over religious minorities.  Meanwhile, there have been dozens of reports on the impending genocide in India against the Muslims, Modi continues to look the other way. Whereas the world remains in shock over the Karnataka incident, there is another aspect to this discriminatory event, which is being neglected by the world media.

The Karnataka incident is not only a religious bigotry, but also an attack on the freedom of women rights.

This raises certain questions over the uneven handedness of the United States and the international community in dealing with India and Afghanistan. Now, that the religious persecution of Muslims in India has also taken the shape of infringing women rights, will the US and the international community be more proactive against India as compared to the interim government of Afghanistan? Or corporate and strategic interest will triumph over the highly celebrated democratic ideals of the international rules-based system?

SAT Editorial Desk

Your go-to editorial hub for policy perspectives and informed analysis on pressing regional and global issues.

Recent

Pakistan’s Doctrine of Verifiable Peace: Realism in the Face of Proxy Politics

Pakistan’s Doctrine of Verifiable Peace: Realism in the Face of Proxy Politics

Pakistan’s Doctrine of Verifiable Peace represents a major shift from fraternal idealism to strategic realism in South Asia’s volatile security landscape. Rooted in classical realist thought, the doctrine emphasizes verification over trust, deterrence over sentiment, and conditional diplomacy over blind faith. Confronting the twin challenges of cross-border militancy and Indian-backed proxy networks in Afghanistan, Islamabad now seeks peace that is enforceable, monitored, and verifiable, anchoring regional stability on responsibility, not rhetoric.

Read More »
When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »