Return of Intazar Ahmad Panjutha Sparks Controversy

Intazar Ahmad Panjutha resurfaces after alleged abduction and torture, sparking controversy over security forces' involvement.

Intazar Ahmad Panjutha, a leading lawyer for Pakistan’s imprisoned former Prime Minister Imran Khan has resurfaced under mysterious circumstances nearly a month after his alleged “enforced disappearance.”

Police officials and Khan’s Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) party confirmed the overnight recovery of Intazar Ahmad Panjutha. He went missing on October 8 while returning home to Islamabad. This recovery occurred amid allegations of involvement by government security agencies.

A day after Pakistan’s attorney general assured a federal high court on Friday that authorities would recover the lawyer “within 24 hours,” Punjutha’s recovery occurred, but he did not provide further details.

Late Saturday, police reported that they intercepted a suspicious vehicle in the city of Hassan Abdul, northwest of the Pakistani capital, and recovered the lawyer. They asserted that armed individuals with Intazar Ahmad Panjutha opened fire at police from within the vehicle and fled.

A video later surfaced showing a visibly shaken and weak Panjutha sitting in a vehicle with his hands and feet tied. In a separate video, the lawyer breaks down in tears while telling police officers that his captors demanded ransom and subjected him to severe custodial torture.

PTI Rejects Police Claims

Khan’s party rejected the police claims and Panjutha’s video remarks, stating that authorities forced him to make the statement and alleging again that security forces abducted the lawyer.

Salman Akram Raja, the secretary general of PTI, identified Intazar Ahmad Panjutha as one of Khan’s key lawyers in his ongoing legal battles.

Raja said in a video statement he released Sunday, “They filmed his condition, which spoke of the horror he endured, and spread it to cause fear. This is shameful.”

A police department spokesperson dismissed allegations of staging a fake encounter, asserting that officers rescued Panjutha from kidnappers demanding ransom.

Absa Komal, a prime-time news anchor at Pakistan’s Dawn TV channel, commented on Panjutha’s video appearance and sympathized with him.

Komal wrote on her social media platform X, formerly known as Twitter, “He is unrecognizable — a changed man. The attorney general told the high court that they would produce him in 24 hours, and this is how they have presented him. Shame on the decision-makers.”

Also See: Amidst Imran Khan’s Imprisonment, Supporters Rally for Release

Government Crackdown on PTI

Since Khan’s removal from power through a parliamentary vote of no confidence in 2022, the government has cracked down on his party members and supporters. A year later, they jailed him over controversial allegations of corruption and inciting violence against the Pakistani military, among dozens of other charges.

The 72-year-old deposed leader rejects the lawsuits as fabricated by the military after allegedly orchestrating his ouster from power, charges government and army officials reject.

Domestic and international human rights groups have intensified their criticism of Pakistan’s military and intelligence agencies. They accuse these agencies of engaging in a campaign to suppress PTI and dissent at large.

Khan, cricket star-turned-prime minister, has led a campaign of defiance against the military since his ouster from power. Army generals have staged three coups and ruled Pakistan for over three decades since it gained independence in 1947.

Critics frequently accuse Pakistan’s military and its intelligence agencies of influencing the rise or fall of elected governments. They allege that this influence occurs through election rigging and pro-army political parties. However, army officials deny these charges.

U.S. Lawmakers Urge Biden to Secure Release of Imran Khan

Last month, more than 60 Democratic lawmakers from the U.S. House of Representatives sent a letter to President Joe Biden. They urged him to secure the release of Khan and all other political prisoners in Pakistan.

The American lawmakers expressed concern about the situation in Pakistan. They denounced what they described as the “ongoing widespread human rights violations” in the South Asian nation. They did not name Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif’s coalition government in their letter. Instead, they stated that “Pakistan’s current system amounts to ‘military rule with civilian facade.’”

Islamabad hit back at the letter, saying it is based on “an incorrect understanding of the political situation in Pakistan.”

This news is sourced from VoA News and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »