Resumption of Military Aid: Reviving US-Pakistan Relations Amid US Withdrawal

Resumption of Military Aid: Reviving US-Pakistan Relations Amid US Withdrawal

Will the resumption of IMET be enough to revive the US-PAK relationship, considering Pakistan’s growing strategic partnership with China and the building pressure from the Taliban to not allow US Military to operate their bases?. 

Resumption of Military Aid

Trump’s administration approved the resumption of the US military training program for Pakistan last year. This coveted US Military and Educational Program recommenced after a suspension of more than a year. The US Principal Secretary for South and Central Asian Affairs Ambassador Alice Well tweeted that the decisions were undertaken by Trump’s administration to strengthen the military-to-military cooperation between the US and Pakistan on a shared basis while prioritizing the US national security.

The International Military Education and Training (IMET) program was suspended in 2018 when Pakistan signed an agreement with Russia. The agreement allowed Pakistani military officers to receive training facilities in Russian Military Institutions. Following the same year in May; Washington suspended most of its security aid, delivery of military equipment and transfer of the security-related funds to Pakistan. Washington claimed that Islamabad has provided safe havens to the terrorists in Afghanistan. Pakistan completely denied all such allegations. Experts orated that the decision would undermine the trust and confidence-building measures between Islamabad and Washington.

However, the US approved the resumption of the training program and agreed to provide technical support to Pakistan regarding its fleet of F-16 aircraft.

These moves underscored the warming relations between the two countries after the meetings between Donald Trump and Imran Khan.

The US Request to Allocate Budget for Pakistan

The US State Department’s budget request for the year 2021 includes a total of 104 million USD for military training programs. These programs serve as an effective mean to strengthen the military alliances and the international coalitions which are mandatory to the US national security and regional stability. Out of this 104 million USD; the State Department has allocated 12.7 million USD for training the military offices of Central and South Asia. Pakistan’s share comprises 3.5 million USD for the resumption of the training programs.

The current IMET program supports the US Indo-Pacific strategy by putting the emphasis on professionalizing the armed forces of the regional partners, promoting professional military education, respect for the rule of law, human rights, and the civilian control of the armed forces. Moreover, the program also includes English language training which will enhance the partner’s abilities to interact with the US.

Reviving Relations

Evidently, the US is making such resumption efforts to improve the bilateral relationship between Pakistan and itself. The relations of the two countries faced heavy strains after the Abbottabad operation in 2011. The IMET program stands as a pillar of US-Pakistan military relations for more than a decade. Moreover, Washington has credited Islamabad’s role in the Afghan Peace Process. Similarly, the US acknowledges Pakistan’s efforts in the negotiations on the US troops withdrawal from Afghanistan.

The suspension of the military assistance included the cancellation of the 66 slots allocated to Pakistani military officers at National Defense University (NDU) Washington. However, the US military tried to keep these educational programs aloof from the political tensions, arguing that bringing the foreign military officers to the US pay long-term dividends.

Pakistan essential role in the Afghan Peace Process has also given birth to speculation about the Pentagon exploring Pakistan as an option for the provision of bases to conduct counterinsurgency operations and preventing Afghanistan from sliding into a civil war following the US withdrawal. However, Pakistan has shown an affirmative stance that it will not provide any bases to the US.

The Afghan Taliban have warned the neighbouring countries not to allow the US to operate its bases in their territories.

Pakistan has denied the provision of the bases. Nonetheless, Pakistan will cooperate with the US in the context of Air Lines of Communications (ALOC) and Ground Lines of Communications (GLOC) signed in 2001 for air and ground support.

Strategic Motives for the Revival in Relations

Pakistan and the US strained relations need a revival due to compelling strategic motives. Pakistani National Security Advisor Mueed Yusuf Pirzada has placed the revival of US-Pakistan relations as a foremost priority. Pakistan and China now have a growing strategic partnership in various domains. However, Pakistan will still try to revive its strategic partnership with the US.

Pakistan’s economic condition is challenging to the present government. Despite Khan’s provisional estimates of a 3.94% GDP growth rate during the fiscal year 2021; the Pakistani economy is still shackled with a lower growth rate, inflation, and debts. Moreover, the lingering sword of FATF, security and foreign policy challenges coupled with the threat of Afghan conflict spilling over into Pakistani soil after the US withdrawal are the strategic motives for the revival in the relations.

The US alliance has brought significant military surpluses to Pakistan. Pakistan received a lavish amount of military and financial assistance accounting for almost 33 billion USD during 2002-17. According to CRS Report for Congress (2007), Pakistan received arm deliveries of 4.6 billion USD during 1999-2006. Similarly, during 1999-2002 the estimated assistance amounted to 2.8 billion USD. This made Pakistan the tenth-largest recipient of US military aid in the world.

The US is looking towards the options available on its table regarding the military bases for the surveillance and the counter-terrorism operations after its withdrawal from Afghanistan. Pakistan is a feasible option for the US as compared to other options. This includes the Central Asian Republics, US Bases in the Gulf and US aircraft carriers in the Arabian Sea. The little clarity regarding CARs and the increased distance from the Gulf makes Pakistan a viable option for the US.

Conclusion

In a nutshell, the resumption of the US military training program shows the US commitment to strengthening bilateral military cooperation. It reflects the US’ Indo-Pacific strategy to professionalize the armed forces of regional partners.

The role of Pakistan in the Afghan Peace Process has also nudged the US to revive the strained bilateral relations.

Moreover, it also has given rise to the speculation about Pentagon exploring Pakistan to provide its bases. This is in regards to the US counterinsurgency operations after US withdrawal from Afghanistan. However, the strategic motives are still the compelling factor to revive the relations between both states.

Pakistan has skillfully managed its relations with both China and the US in the past. However, it still remains ambiguous that whether Pakistan will reset its relationship with the US without disturbing its strategic partner China. The situation will soon unfold shortly after the scheduled US withdrawal from Afghanistan.

Also See: Chinese Interest in Afghanistan After the US Withdrawal

Shaheer Ahmed

Shaheer Ahmed

Shaheer Ahmed is a research scholar passionate about analyzing diplomatic relations and political dynamics between nations, focusing on their impact on global power structures.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »