Ram Mandir: The Symbolic Inauguration

Ram Mandir inauguration marks a shift to Hindu majoritarianism, raising concerns for minority rights and secular values in India under Modi.

The glamour of Ayodhya’s Ram Mandir inauguration snubbed a trail of injustice and violence that intertwined with the rise of the political wing of the Hindu majoritarian collective, Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS). It took the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) nearly two decades to claim political space for the extreme narrative of a Hindu-only state, or what they call Ram Rajya. These two decades can be seen both as a period of resilience and downgrade.

Resilience, in terms of the secular sentiments keeping the balance between pluralism and the bigger, larger push towards Hindu majoritarianism. Take for example the verdict of India’s Supreme Court after the demolition of the Babri Masjid in 1992. The verdict acknowledged that politics and religion must stay apart.

Now comparing this verdict with 2019, when the same highest seat of judiciary allocated a separate space for a Masjid and called the claim of Mandir in the exact spot where Babri Masjid stood as legitimate, the downgrade becomes apparent. Unfortunately for the followers of other religions in India, this downgrade was never peaceful. Each passing day after the ruins of Babri Masjid would make the hearts of Muslims bleed, the hands that destroyed the mosque were emboldened.

Modi-India
Image Source: NewYorker

2014 was the year of climax when the BJP finally had the political power it tried so hard to harness from the streets in those two decades. The downgrade still wasn’t complete; it was perhaps a beginning where political power would justify every act of vigilante violence.

Babri Masjid being the first, from here on, the destruction of mosques started turning into numbers.

Sometimes the excuse was a road widening project and sometimes, a legal petition questioning the construction of age-old mosques, until the Masjid-Mandir controversies came to be known as one of the many campaigns that were and are some serious indicators of an ever-declining rights’ trajectory of religious minorities in India.

But the symbolism of Ram Mandir’s inauguration is much more than Modi gearing up for a third consecutive term in power. No doubt that Modi’s politics has centred on three canon events – the abrogation of Kashmir’s special status, the Citizenship Amendment Act, and finally the $220m mega construction of the Ram Mandir. The common denominator in all these three is religion.

From ‘Kashmir cannot be an autonomous Muslim majority state’ to ‘all Hindus from neighbouring countries can take refuge and ultimately citizenship of India’ to ‘we have reclaimed and fought our way back to the birth place of Rama,’ Modi’s BJP have stalled itself as the only party in India that manifests the aspirations of a Greater Hindu India (read Bharat).

Babri Masjid
Image Source: AFP

Modi’s political campaign seems to be in good spirits since the inauguration.

Also Read: From Nehru to Modi

But in erasing a religious symbol to erect another one, secular India has died down under the ruins of Babri Masjid.

Not just that, political normalization of religiously-motivated violence has turned India into a dangerous country. The Muslim world turned a blind eye to the grand celebration in India on 22 January 2024, because it is convenient to overlook this event as India’s internal matter. Lesser does the world recognize that the drive to demolish a mosque can also manifest into a desire to bulldoze the holiest sites of all other religions, only to erect Mandirs.

WebDesk

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »