Pakistan’s Military Courts Allowed to Announce Verdicts in May 9 Riots Cases

Pakistan’s Supreme Court allows military courts to announce verdicts in May 9 riots cases, affecting Imran Khan’s supporters. [Image via AFP/File]

ISLAMABAD: Pakistan’s Supreme Court on Friday conditionally allowed military courts to announce the reserved verdicts of 85 civilians tried over their alleged involvement in last year’s May 9 riots, a major blow to the party of jailed ex-premier Imran Khan that the violence has been linked to. 

The ruling comes a little over a year after a three-member bench of the top court said last October military trials of civilians were unconstitutional and ordered the trials of some 103 people moved to civilian criminal courts, a relief for dozens accused of ransacking military installations during protests after the brief arrest of Khan on May 9, 2023. However, on December 13, 2023, a six-member bench conditionally suspended its own Oct. 23 ruling, pending a final judgment as it heard a set of intra-court appeals (ICAs).

Hundreds of alleged Khan supporters were arrested after they stormed military and government installations, and even torched a top commander’s house, following the former premier’s brief arrest by paramilitary soldiers in a land bribe case. Though Khan was released just days after the violence of May 9, he was arrested again that August following an accountability court’s ruling in another corruption case and has been in jail since, facing a slew of legal charges he says are trumped up to keep him away from politics. 

The military initiated army court trials of at least 103 people accused of involvement in the violence and there have been widespread reports it also plans to prosecute Khan under the Pakistan Army Act on charges of treason and attempting to incite a mutiny in the military.

Announcing Friday’s verdict, Justice Aminuddin Khan, the head of the constitutional bench said:

“Suspects who can be accorded concessions in their sentences, should be given so and released … Suspects who cannot be released should be moved to jails once their sentence has been pronounced.”

Also See: Ex-PM Khan Charged With Instigating Violence Against Military

In March, a six-member SC bench had also conditionally allowed military courts to pronounce reserved verdicts in the May 9 cases. It had also modified its Dec. 13 injunction, ordering that military courts could commence trials but they would not convict or acquit any suspects as long as the government-instituted intra-court appeals were pending.

Local and global rights groups have expressed concerns over the military trials, saying such courts do not have the same standards of evidence and due process as civilian courts.

Pakistan’s Army Act of 1952 established military courts primarily to try members of the military or enemies of the state, and they operate under a separate legal system.

The decision to use military courts was taken by the government of Khan’s rival, Shehbaz Sharif, and backed by the army.

This news is sourced from Arab News and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »