Pakistan’s appointment as Chair of the United Nations Security Council’s (UNSC) 1988 Taliban Sanctions Committee for the year 2025 marks a significant geopolitical milestone. The committee plays a central role in overseeing sanctions enforcement — including asset freezes, travel bans, and arms embargoes — against Taliban-affiliated individuals and entities deemed a threat to Afghan and regional stability.
This is not merely a symbolic position. It is a role that carries substantial operational influence over how the international community calibrates its approach to peace and security in Afghanistan — a region where Pakistan has maintained both strategic leverage and historical entanglements.
UNSC Committee 1988: Mandate and Significance
The 1988 Sanctions Committee was carved out of the broader Al-Qaeda and ISIL Sanctions Committee in 2011 to deal specifically with the Taliban, following the group’s resurgence in Afghanistan. It monitors compliance by member states and facilitates humanitarian exemptions, sanctions listing/delisting processes, and coordination with field missions. The chairperson has the authority to shape the pace and nature of sanctions discussions and to guide consensus on politically sensitive dossiers.
In 2023, the Committee had listed 135 individuals and 5 entities. It plays a critical gate-keeping role in determining the balance between isolating terrorist elements and enabling humanitarian operations — a delicate calculus since the Taliban’s return to power in 2021.
Pakistan’s Geopolitical Leverage
Pakistan’s selection to lead the 1988 Committee reflects its centrality to Afghan security dynamics and its evolving global diplomatic posture. After the recent diplomatic fallout of India alongside its global acknowledgement as a terror sponsoring state, Pakistan now gains an institutional platform to influence the global narrative, not only to dispel past allegations to harbor Taliban entities but to steer international efforts toward pragmatic engagement with the de facto authorities in Kabul.
Pakistan’s evolving counterterrorism doctrine — increasingly emphasizing regional connectivity in terms of CPEC and the Central Asian States, intelligence cooperation with China, Turkey and other regional allies, and FATF compliance — will inform its approach. This chairmanship coincides with Pakistan’s calls for calibrated sanctions, allowing space for humanitarian assistance and economic stability in Afghanistan while continuing to target transnational terrorist networks.
A Parallel Role in the Counter-Terrorism Committee
In tandem, Pakistan has also been appointed vice-chair of the UN Security Council’s Counter-Terrorism Committee (CTC), further solidifying its role in global counterterrorism governance. The CTC monitors implementation of UNSC resolutions like 1373 (2001), which calls on states to prevent and suppress terrorism financing and support.
This dual placement — in both targeted and broad-spectrum counterterrorism bodies — grants Islamabad a unique opportunity to align its national security concerns (especially cross-border terrorism from non-state actors operating from Afghan soil) with global norms and multilateral oversight.
Diplomatic Implications and Strategic Messaging
This development comes at a time when Pakistan is actively seeking to reposition itself in global forums following its removal from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey list in 2022. It sends a message of trust-building to Western and regional partners, especially amid accusations of Indian state-sponsored terrorism in Balochistan — an issue recently spotlighted by Pakistan’s DG ISPR in international press briefings.
By taking the helm of the Taliban Sanctions Committee, Pakistan can advocate for a more nuanced, multilateral approach to Afghan engagement — emphasizing stability, humanitarianism, and counterterrorism convergence over punitive isolation.
Way Forward
For Pakistan, chairing the 1988 Committee is not merely a diplomatic feather in the cap; it is a strategic lever. As global stakeholders reassess the future of Afghan governance, regional stability, and sanctions effectiveness, Islamabad is now in a position to influence outcomes that align with its national interest: a peaceful, economically viable Afghanistan free of transnational terror threats.
To maximize this opportunity, Pakistan must adopt a transparent, data-driven leadership approach in the committee, promoting cooperative compliance, counterterrorism innovation, and humanitarian pragmatism.
Conclusion:
Pakistan’s appointment to lead one of the UN Security Council’s most sensitive sanctions bodies marks a transformative moment in its multilateral diplomacy. With this role comes the responsibility and opportunity — to reshape how global counterterrorism and sanctions regimes are operationalized in one of the world’s most volatile regions.
This is not just about chairing a committee; it is about recalibrating regional stability through multilateral governance.
Pakistan to Lead UN Sanctions on Taliban in 2025
Pakistan’s appointment as Chair of the United Nations Security Council’s (UNSC) 1988 Taliban Sanctions Committee for the year 2025 marks a significant geopolitical milestone. The committee plays a central role in overseeing sanctions enforcement — including asset freezes, travel bans, and arms embargoes — against Taliban-affiliated individuals and entities deemed a threat to Afghan and regional stability.
This is not merely a symbolic position. It is a role that carries substantial operational influence over how the international community calibrates its approach to peace and security in Afghanistan — a region where Pakistan has maintained both strategic leverage and historical entanglements.
UNSC Committee 1988: Mandate and Significance
The 1988 Sanctions Committee was carved out of the broader Al-Qaeda and ISIL Sanctions Committee in 2011 to deal specifically with the Taliban, following the group’s resurgence in Afghanistan. It monitors compliance by member states and facilitates humanitarian exemptions, sanctions listing/delisting processes, and coordination with field missions. The chairperson has the authority to shape the pace and nature of sanctions discussions and to guide consensus on politically sensitive dossiers.
In 2023, the Committee had listed 135 individuals and 5 entities. It plays a critical gate-keeping role in determining the balance between isolating terrorist elements and enabling humanitarian operations — a delicate calculus since the Taliban’s return to power in 2021.
Pakistan’s Geopolitical Leverage
Pakistan’s selection to lead the 1988 Committee reflects its centrality to Afghan security dynamics and its evolving global diplomatic posture. After the recent diplomatic fallout of India alongside its global acknowledgement as a terror sponsoring state, Pakistan now gains an institutional platform to influence the global narrative, not only to dispel past allegations to harbor Taliban entities but to steer international efforts toward pragmatic engagement with the de facto authorities in Kabul.
Pakistan’s evolving counterterrorism doctrine — increasingly emphasizing regional connectivity in terms of CPEC and the Central Asian States, intelligence cooperation with China, Turkey and other regional allies, and FATF compliance — will inform its approach. This chairmanship coincides with Pakistan’s calls for calibrated sanctions, allowing space for humanitarian assistance and economic stability in Afghanistan while continuing to target transnational terrorist networks.
A Parallel Role in the Counter-Terrorism Committee
In tandem, Pakistan has also been appointed vice-chair of the UN Security Council’s Counter-Terrorism Committee (CTC), further solidifying its role in global counterterrorism governance. The CTC monitors implementation of UNSC resolutions like 1373 (2001), which calls on states to prevent and suppress terrorism financing and support.
This dual placement — in both targeted and broad-spectrum counterterrorism bodies — grants Islamabad a unique opportunity to align its national security concerns (especially cross-border terrorism from non-state actors operating from Afghan soil) with global norms and multilateral oversight.
Diplomatic Implications and Strategic Messaging
This development comes at a time when Pakistan is actively seeking to reposition itself in global forums following its removal from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) grey list in 2022. It sends a message of trust-building to Western and regional partners, especially amid accusations of Indian state-sponsored terrorism in Balochistan — an issue recently spotlighted by Pakistan’s DG ISPR in international press briefings.
By taking the helm of the Taliban Sanctions Committee, Pakistan can advocate for a more nuanced, multilateral approach to Afghan engagement — emphasizing stability, humanitarianism, and counterterrorism convergence over punitive isolation.
Way Forward
For Pakistan, chairing the 1988 Committee is not merely a diplomatic feather in the cap; it is a strategic lever. As global stakeholders reassess the future of Afghan governance, regional stability, and sanctions effectiveness, Islamabad is now in a position to influence outcomes that align with its national interest: a peaceful, economically viable Afghanistan free of transnational terror threats.
To maximize this opportunity, Pakistan must adopt a transparent, data-driven leadership approach in the committee, promoting cooperative compliance, counterterrorism innovation, and humanitarian pragmatism.
Conclusion:
Pakistan’s appointment to lead one of the UN Security Council’s most sensitive sanctions bodies marks a transformative moment in its multilateral diplomacy. With this role comes the responsibility and opportunity — to reshape how global counterterrorism and sanctions regimes are operationalized in one of the world’s most volatile regions.
This is not just about chairing a committee; it is about recalibrating regional stability through multilateral governance.
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.
Recent
The Making of an Enemy: The Taliban’s Narrative War Against Pakistan
The Taliban’s hostility toward Pakistan is not confined to isolated voices. Rooted in religious narratives that brand Islamabad as “un-Islamic” and reinforced by incendiary speeches and propaganda, this rhetoric fosters deep mistrust. While official representatives preach cooperation, commanders and ideologues openly glorify conflict, creating a dangerous contradiction between diplomacy and reality.
Islamophobia and Global Politics After 9/11
The 9/11 attacks reshaped global politics and ignited the US-led “War on Terror.” Beyond Afghanistan and Iraq, Muslims worldwide faced rising Islamophobia, systemic discrimination, and cultural vilification. This era marked the transformation of prejudice into an entrenched political and social structure across the West.
Zionism, Gaza, and the Crisis of Civilisation: The Exhaustion of the Western-Led World Order
The Gaza war highlights how Zionism functions as a structural contradiction within the Western-led order, exposing its exhaustion and accelerating a wider civilisational crisis. What is unfolding is not simply another regional conflict but evidence that the very system once projected as the “endpoint of history” is unable to enforce norms, restrain its clients, or reconcile its internal contradictions.
The Dying Rules-Based Order: How Israel’s Actions in Doha Test American Influence
Israel’s airstrike on Hamas leaders in Doha marks more than a breach of Qatari sovereignty, it is a direct challenge to US authority and the fragile rules-based international order. The attack exposes Washington’s inability to restrain its ally, while raising profound questions about Gulf security, Arab solidarity, and the future of international law.
Ahmad Shah Massoud: Hero, Warlord, Legend
Ahmad Shah Massoud’s life embodied both heroism and controversy. Celebrated as the Lion of Panjshir for his defiance of the Soviets and Taliban, he was also criticized for his role in Afghanistan’s civil war and the atrocities linked to his forces. His legacy endures as a symbol of resistance and division alike.