Pakistan to aid America in Reducing Child Abductions

Pakistan to aid America in Reducing Child Abductions

America has accepted Pakistan’s accession to the 1980 Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. Additionally, the American state department has announced on its website that this would come into force from October 1, 2020.

Moreover, according to a statement released by the American state department, Pakistan\’s accession was accepted on July 1. “As partners, we will enhance our shared commitment to protecting children. As well as open a new chapter in the vibrant US-Pakistan relationship,” the department said. “Preventing and resolving cases of international parental child abduction is one of the Department’s highest priorities.”

A Good Tool for Deterrence

Similarly, the above-stated convention is a vital tool to deter international abduction and secure the return of these children. America has around 80 partner countries under this convention. This provides a mechanism under civil law in either country for parents seeking the return of children who have been removed in violation of custodial rights.

“We look forward to welcoming Pakistan as a new partner in this global effort to address international parental child abduction,” it said.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

US diplomat Zalmay Khalilzad’s recent critique of Pakistan’s counterterrorism operations in Balochistan misrepresents ground realities, conflating state action with terrorism and ignoring the legacy of his own diplomatic failures.

Zalmay Khalilzad’s Distortion of Pakistan’s Security Realities

Zalmay Khalilzad’s recent tweets portray Pakistan as collapsing, criticizing counterterrorism operations while ignoring the real drivers of instability in Balochistan: foreign-backed terrorism, criminal networks, and the civilian and security force toll. By conflating state action with militancy, he misrepresents ground realities and obscures the failures of his own Afghan diplomacy. This commentary exposes the gap between his rhetoric and Pakistan’s efforts to maintain law, order, and development under complex security challenges.

Read More »