Pakistan Called on NAM Demanding Immediate End to Israel’s Offensive in Palestine

Pakistan demanded immediate action to stop the sanguinary attacks of Israeli forces on innocent Palestinians. This demand was put forward by Pakistan when the 120 member body’s coordination bureau was adjoined to give serious heed to worsening conditions in East Jerusalem and parts of Palestine which are occupied by the Israeli forces. Pakistan asked the Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) to lead up to the current bloodied atrocities happening on Palestinian people by Israel.

Concurrently, Pakistan’s Permanent Representative to United Nations Munir Akram urged NAM representatives not to surrender to the aggressor\’s rhetoric. The capitulation of Israel’s rhetoric is based on making a military equivalency between a weakened and unarmed Palestinian people and one of the region\’s strongest military forces.

Pakistan Shows Respect for International Values for Humanity and Peace

\’Our Values must determine our response. Values such as people\’s self-determination and struggle against foreign occupation and aggression. The attempts to match the Israeli aggression with the Palestinian defence are worrying to hear.\’ Munir added.

Likewise, he said that the solidarity that Palestinian brothers today need is solidarity focused on; firstly, Israel has no business to be in the occupied territory of Palestine. Secondly, It has no business to plant its feet on East Jerusalem. Last but not the least, it has no business to attack Gaza.

Pakistani envoy regretted the fact that only one state was blocking the UN Security Council’s call for a ceasefire. He reiterated that the UN must place efforts to lift the state\’s veto. Similarly, there should be a pursue a call for a ceasefire against this aggression. The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM) must pursue a two-state solution to foster peace and stability in the area and restore international legality.

\’Allow us to take a position that is entrenched in realities and on humanity. However, not on the considerations of power relationships.\’ Munir added.

Munir said that to unearth Israeli’s state terrorism in the Middle East and to bring permanent peace in Palestine, Pakistan’s Foreign Affairs Ministery is working day and night wholeheartedly.

Pakistan has supported the Palestinian cause since its first appearance in the world political arena. Along with Palestine, heinous atrocities happening in IOK are also one of the major concerns for Pakistan. Pakistan expects that the UNSC and the world community will support its efforts. The country\’s efforts are primarily based on humanity, self-determination, and struggle against aggression and occupation. The UN and its Peace-Keeping bodies must condemn crimes against humanity. This should be regardless of whether they take place in Kashmir or Palestine.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »