Nepal to Limit the Total Number of Climbers for Mount Everest

Nepal has implemented a quota scheme that limits the number of climbers allowed to attempt Everest in a desperate attempt to avoid overcrowding on the world\’s highest peak as the country prepares for a record number of climbers this season, which begins in May.

No Crowd Allowed

The Department of Tourism issued a memorandum on Wednesday for a limited number of mountaineers, chosen based on their climbing permit numbers, to attempt the summit within the first \”weather window\” that opens after the ropes and ladders are fixed up to the roof.

A certain number of people will be able to attempt the summit within the second weather window, or during a time of good weather when climbing is safe, and so on.

If this scheme fails, the adventure outfitters will have to arrange and organize the climbing among themselves, with a maximum of 170 people in one weather window, according to the Department of Tourism.

History and the COVID

According to Guinness World Records, the most people to cross the summit of Everest in a single day is 354, with 212 climbers from Nepal, according to a recordset on May 23, 2019. Similarly, on May 19, 2013, 266 people reached the summit of Everest.

The government granted 381 Everest climbing permits in 2019. It was a record number, causing “traffic jams” on the snowy path to the summit. On the Nepalese side, ten people died, the highest death toll in four years.

The number of permits granted this year, in the middle of the second wave of Covid-19, is high. Authorities predict that this will set a new limit. The department had given climbing permits to 377 people as of Wednesday.

“Based on the current trend, we estimate the number of permits to be close to 400,” said Mira Acharya, director of the Department of Tourism.

Everest could see a throng of over 800 people crawling up its slopes this year. Inevitably creating fears of yet another record crowd on the planet\’s highest stage.

Opinions of Top Officials

The new guidelines sound fine on paper, and expeditions must follow the government\’s decision. Although, they aren\’t \”practically implementable,\” according to Dambar Parajuli, president of the Expedition Operators Association.

According to Parajuli, in previous years, expedition organizers were also permitted to set the number of climbers. However, this is based on a common agreement.

As many climbers compete for the summit at the same time on Everest, a \”traffic jam\”-like scenario occurs. Consequently, when it occurs over 8,000 meters, the \”Death Zone,\” it can be very risky.

Due to the number of Climbers, a \’traffic jam\’ can potentially occur. As a result, they have to wait for their turn to ascend or descent on a single cable. This in return raises the risk of fatigue, frostbite, or altitude sickness.

Climbers can also run out of oxygen during the ascent\’s final stages. In the wake of the Covid-19 threat, a climber is not permitted to attempt another mountain directly after completing the first ascent. This is according to the most recent directive.

Until going on another climb, a climber must apply a negative polymerase chain reaction test result, according to the guideline.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of how the Taliban’s promised 2021 amnesty has collapsed into widespread arrests, killings, and repression, echoing historical patterns of Taliban rule.

A New Afghanistan, Old Methods

The Taliban’s 2021 promise of a general amnesty has collapsed into systematic arrests, disappearances, and killings—especially in Panjshir. Despite assurances of moderation, evidence from 2021–2025 shows a deliberate campaign to eliminate former officials, suppress dissent, and rule through fear, mirroring the Taliban’s historical patterns of coercion and violence.

Read More »
Oil, Ports, and Proxies: The Battle for Hadhramawt and the Red Sea

Oil, Ports, and Proxies: The Battle for Hadhramawt and the Red Sea

The expulsion of Saudi-backed forces from Hadhramawt by UAE-aligned proxies signals the collapse of the Riyadh-Abu Dhabi alliance. In Yemen and Sudan, Abu Dhabi leverages non-state actors to secure ports, resources, and influence, while Riyadh prioritizes state stability and territorial consolidation. The result: a regional realignment where Gulf unity gives way to fierce intra-Gulf competition.

Read More »
India’s Coercive Foreign Policy in 2025 By Farwa Imtiaz

India’s Coercive Foreign Policy in 2025

India’s foreign policy in 2025 marks a clear break from its earlier soft-power orientation, shifting toward overt coercion and interference. Once seen as a restrained global actor, India now increasingly relies on hard power, diplomatic pressure, and transnational repression to shape external outcomes. Through cases in Canada, Pakistan, Bangladesh, and Türkiye, this article shows how India has adopted a more assertive—and often destabilizing—approach to protect its expanding ambitions, using tools ranging from foreign interference to military escalation and economic coercion.

Read More »
The End of Liberal Internationalism

The End of Liberal Internationalism

The 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy marks a decisive break from the post-1945 liberal order, replacing globalism and multilateralism with a neo-Westphalian focus on sovereign nation-states, fortified borders, and exclusionary spheres of influence. It signals America’s retreat from global leadership and the return of great-power rivalry.

Read More »
A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »