Media companies in Afghanistan have termed new rules as an existential threat to independent journalism, and are calling upon the government to scrap them. They spoke out on Wednesday, June 24, ahead of a meeting with officials to discuss amendments.
Earlier this month, changes in the media laws were sent to the parliament for ratification. However, they were recalled after intense media backlash. The new proposals included changes like the revelation of sources to both, government bodies and security services.
Lotfullah Najafizada, director of Tolonews, Afghanistan’s largest private TV channel called the changes “shocking”. He added that “Freedom of expression has transformed Afghanistan in two decades and any setback is a grave mistake.”
The spokesman for President Ashraf Ghani Sediq Sediqqi then issued a statement saying that the government is dedicated to the protection of press freedom, thus the president has recalled the draft from the parliament.
One of Ghani’s vice-presidents is due to discuss the draft with media companies. Meetings are to be held later this week.
Media and the press in Afghanistan have faced much adversity due to unrest, and have begun a long road to recovery since 2001 when the Taliban regime fell. Under the strict and harsh rule of the Taliban, television had been banned in the country. Domestic media in Afghanistan only grew much later, in 2014, after international outlet presence was reduced, after the draw-down of foreign troops.
The debate surrounding media regulations during the Ghani regime in 2020 underscores the ongoing struggle for press freedom in Afghanistan. As the country continues to grapple with political instability and security challenges, the delicate balance between governmental oversight and journalistic independence remains a contentious issue. The pushback from media companies against proposed changes to the media laws reflects their concerns about potential threats to press freedom and the integrity of independent journalism.
President Ashraf Ghani’s administration faced criticism over the proposed amendments, with media outlets expressing fear that the new rules could stifle their ability to operate freely and protect their sources. The decision to recall the draft legislation from parliament following intense backlash highlights the power of public outcry in shaping government policies related to media freedom.
Against the backdrop of Afghanistan’s turbulent history and ongoing efforts to rebuild its democratic institutions, the protection of press freedom emerges as a critical component of the country’s transition towards stability and prosperity. As Afghanistan continues its journey since the fall of the Taliban regime in 2001, the need to safeguard media independence and uphold democratic values remains paramount.
In the face of persistent challenges and uncertainties, fostering open dialogue and collaboration between the government, press, and civil society is essential. Only through concerted efforts to uphold the principles of transparency, accountability, and freedom of expression can Afghanistan build a resilient media landscape that serves the interests of its people and strengthens its democratic institutions.
Media Unhappy Over New Regulations, Asks Government to Afghan Reconsider
Media companies in Afghanistan have termed new rules as an existential threat to independent journalism, and are calling upon the government to scrap them. They spoke out on Wednesday, June 24, ahead of a meeting with officials to discuss amendments.
Earlier this month, changes in the media laws were sent to the parliament for ratification. However, they were recalled after intense media backlash. The new proposals included changes like the revelation of sources to both, government bodies and security services.
Lotfullah Najafizada, director of Tolonews, Afghanistan’s largest private TV channel called the changes “shocking”. He added that “Freedom of expression has transformed Afghanistan in two decades and any setback is a grave mistake.”
The spokesman for President Ashraf Ghani Sediq Sediqqi then issued a statement saying that the government is dedicated to the protection of press freedom, thus the president has recalled the draft from the parliament.
One of Ghani’s vice-presidents is due to discuss the draft with media companies. Meetings are to be held later this week.
Media and the press in Afghanistan have faced much adversity due to unrest, and have begun a long road to recovery since 2001 when the Taliban regime fell. Under the strict and harsh rule of the Taliban, television had been banned in the country. Domestic media in Afghanistan only grew much later, in 2014, after international outlet presence was reduced, after the draw-down of foreign troops.
The debate surrounding media regulations during the Ghani regime in 2020 underscores the ongoing struggle for press freedom in Afghanistan. As the country continues to grapple with political instability and security challenges, the delicate balance between governmental oversight and journalistic independence remains a contentious issue. The pushback from media companies against proposed changes to the media laws reflects their concerns about potential threats to press freedom and the integrity of independent journalism.
President Ashraf Ghani’s administration faced criticism over the proposed amendments, with media outlets expressing fear that the new rules could stifle their ability to operate freely and protect their sources. The decision to recall the draft legislation from parliament following intense backlash highlights the power of public outcry in shaping government policies related to media freedom.
Against the backdrop of Afghanistan’s turbulent history and ongoing efforts to rebuild its democratic institutions, the protection of press freedom emerges as a critical component of the country’s transition towards stability and prosperity. As Afghanistan continues its journey since the fall of the Taliban regime in 2001, the need to safeguard media independence and uphold democratic values remains paramount.
In the face of persistent challenges and uncertainties, fostering open dialogue and collaboration between the government, press, and civil society is essential. Only through concerted efforts to uphold the principles of transparency, accountability, and freedom of expression can Afghanistan build a resilient media landscape that serves the interests of its people and strengthens its democratic institutions.
Komal Salman
Komal Salman
Komal Salman, a multifaceted professional with experience spanning graphic design since undergraduate studies, media production, indie authorship, and artistry, brings a rich storytelling perspective to her work.
Recent
Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground
A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.
Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion
Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy
Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.
We Want Deliverance
Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.
Nuclear Technology at COP30: What It Means for Pakistan’s Clean Energy Goals
At COP30, nuclear energy emerged as a key solution for global clean-energy transitions. For Pakistan, expanding nuclear power, especially through Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), offers a path to cleaner, reliable electricity, despite challenges like high costs and restricted technology access.