Kashmiri Resistance: Terrorism or Insurgency

Is the attack on the Indian Army vehicle in Poonch, claimed by Kashmiri resistance, an act of  terrorism or insurgency? In recent news, an attack on an Indian Army vehicle in Poonch, Jammu, and Kashmir on April 20, 2023, has sparked a debate. Some argue that the attack is an act of terrorism. Others believe it is a legitimate response to the Indian occupation of Kashmir.

Kashmir: On India

Historically, the Indian government’s policies on Kashmir have been highly controversial. The scrapping of Articles 370 and 35A in August 2019 further ignited the Kashmiri struggle for autonomy and self-determination. Critics widely view the move as counterproductive, believing it only fuels the resistance movement further.

For decades, the Indian government has occupied the region of Jammu and Kashmir, denying the Kashmiri people their right to self-determination. Now, the Indian government’s attempts to normalize the situation in Kashmir through events like the G20 are futile and misguided.

The recent attack on the Indian army convoy in Poonch is a clear message that the conflict cannot be resolved until the Kashmiri people’s right to self-determination is recognized.

Kashmiri Resistance: Unpacking Debate – Terrorism or Insurgency?

The Kashmiri resistance is not just a band of “terrorists,” as the Indian government claims and the Indian media portrays. Instead, deep-rooted grievances against Indian occupation drive the insurgency. The use of the “terrorist” label is a calculated move to delegitimize the resistance and distract from the rampant human rights violations occurring in the region. Indigenous groups like the People’s Anti-Fascist Force (PAFF) and The Joint Kashmir Front (JKF) mainly lead the fight. Kashmiris are struggling to reclaim their rights in the face of overwhelming oppression and persecution from Indian authorities.

This incident carries significant implications, particularly in light of several upcoming international events in India. These events include the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) meeting on May 4-5, 2023. Additionally, the G20 Tourism Working Group meeting is scheduled in Srinagar, the summer capital of Indian-administered Kashmir, on May 22-24. Additionally, organizers have scheduled two consultative forums on youth affairs (Y-20) to be held in Leh and Srinagar. Last, but not least, the recent statements by Satya Pal Malik, former governor of Indian-Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir, which “vindicate” Pakistan’s stance on the 2019 Pulwama attack, have also raised questions about the Modi-led BJP Government in India.

The Indian government’s heavy-handed approach to quelling the movement has only led to further violence and unrest in the region.

International Crisis Group Warns of Kashmir Policy Risks

The International Crisis Group, a global think tank, has warned that the Indian government’s policies in Kashmir could lead to “disastrous consequences.” They have called for a serious “rethink” of these policies and a move toward a more inclusive approach.

Therefore, it is crucial to understand that indigenous people, not external forces, drive the resistance movement in Kashmir. This movement is definitely not a new development. It has been ongoing for decades, and it is a response to the illegal Indian occupation of their land. The resistance movement is rooted in the history and culture of the Kashmiri people.

Towards Resolution: Pakistan, India, and International Community

While India attributes the surge in militancy over the last three decades to Pakistan-based jihadist groups, the International Crisis Group’s report, Raising the Stakes in Jammu and Kashmir, contends that the underlying causes of the Kashmiri resistance movement are internal. Thus, it is imperative to acknowledge and comprehend this aspect of the struggle, which continues to be a significant concern for the Kashmiri people.

Despite the complexities of the Kashmir conflict, it’s clear that the indigenous resistance movement is fighting for their right to self-determination, as guaranteed by the United Nations (UN) charter.

While having an established stance on Kashmir, it’s important for Pakistan to support the Kashmiri people morally and diplomatically. However, it’s worth noting that Pakistan has been vocal about the Kashmir issue and has supported the resistance movement, which is in contrast to their lack of support when their own elites abandoned the Kashmiri cause.

The international community must recognize the legitimate grievances of the Kashmiri people and support their right to self-determination. The Indian government must recognize the legitimate grievances of the Kashmiri people and engage in meaningful dialogue toward a peaceful resolution to the conflict. It is time for all parties involved to take steps towards peace and stability in the region.

SAT Editorial Desk

Your go-to editorial hub for policy perspectives and informed analysis on pressing regional and global issues.

Recent

Pakistan-Only? The TTP’s Transnational Reality

Pakistan-Only? The TTP’s Transnational Reality

While the TTP publicly claims its insurgency targets only Pakistan, evidence reveals a transnational reality. Supported by Afghan fighters and resources, and shaped by the Afghan Taliban’s strategic interests, the TTP exemplifies cross-border proxy warfare. Understanding its structure, motivations, and operational networks challenges simplistic “Pakistan-only” narratives and underscores the enduring complexities of South Asian security.

Read More »
Pakistan’s Heritage and Rights Ethos: Unlocking Cultural Diplomacy

Pakistan’s Heritage and Rights Ethos: Unlocking Cultural Diplomacy

Pakistan’s diverse cultural heritage, from the hospitality of Pashtunwali and Sufi music in Sindh to folk traditions in Punjab, Balochistan, and Gilgit–Baltistan, reflects an enduring rights-based ethos. These living practices promote dignity, justice, and social inclusion. By integrating these traditions into cultural diplomacy, Pakistan can showcase its soft power while supporting custodians of heritage, artisans, and local communities.

Read More »
A deep dive into how the Afghan Taliban weaponises anti-Pakistan rhetoric to mask governance failures, rising poverty, and Afghanistan’s growing security meltdown.

The Politics of Blame

Afghanistan’s leadership has responded to recent international backlash by amplifying a narrative that frames Pakistan as the root of all Afghan crises. This rhetoric, pushed by senior Taliban officials, serves as a diversion from Kabul’s own administrative paralysis, economic collapse, and its complicity in enabling militant groups like the TTP. As poverty deepens and Afghanistan becomes a hub for dozens of terrorist outfits, the politics of blame has become the Taliban’s primary tool for deflecting scrutiny.

Read More »
Sanctuary and Sovereignty: The Tribal Ethics Behind the Pakistan–Taliban Rift

Sanctuary and Sovereignty: The Tribal Ethics Behind the Pakistan–Taliban Rift

The piece analyzes the Pakistan–Taliban rift through the lens of Pashtunwali, highlighting how Kabul’s sheltering of the TTP and its revival of Durand Line irredentism conflict with the tribal code’s principles of hospitality, sanctuary, and reciprocity. These choices undermine decades of Pakistani support and have transformed a historically interdependent relationship into one marked by distrust and hostility.

Read More »