Indo-European Trade Deal – An Attempt to Block China’s Rising Influence?

In April, talks were held between India and the European Union to revive the discussion on trade deals. Since 2013, Many a trade deal between India and the EU have been put on hold. This was largely because both nations failed to agree on a mutual agreement. The two parties could not reach a consensus on the extent of tariff reductions, patent protection, data security, and the rights of Indian professionals to work in Europe.

Indo-European Deal

Regarding this matter, Modi had a telephonic meeting with UN chief executive Ursula von der Leyen in April. Subsequently, they have agreed to meet in Lisbon, Portugal for further discussions. German Chancellor Angela Markel and EU Council President Charles Michel will also join the meeting.

The revival of trade deal would help build a $9 6billion trading mechanism between India and the European Union, that will help flourish and make a comfortable environment for the investment and flow of goods. The European Parliament will approve the deal, after which it will be sent to New Delhi for approval.

According to analysts in 2020, the deal could potentially constitute a benefit of $10 billion. However, on the other hand, the UK is working on its autonomous foreign policy to independently deal with its former trading partners. Trading partners that were previously under the flag of the European Union.

Moreover, the interest of the EU enhancing its trade with India has some evident logic. India is one of the fastest-growing economies in the world. The European Union can increase its share in the total Indian trade to a benchmark of 15%.

However, several analysts believe that this trade deal will also be used for another purpose. Such as the US\’s attempt to counter China in the region. China is currently, heavily involved in a lot of international projects. These include China\’s mammoth project of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in South Asia.

China’s Ambitions

According to the BRI map, China will be creating a Silk Road Economic Belt through Asia into eastern Europe and then connect to western Europe via the railroad that it will be constructing. Even though Europe will be benefiting from this, it equally threatens European Union as China rises.

India’s Dilemma

The rise of China is another thing that binds India and the European Union with each other. They both will use their economic might to challenge China in Eurasian. On the other hand, India is also countering China in the Indo-Pacific Ocean as the USA facilitates India with ‘The Quad’ cooperation. The Quad consists of the US, India, Australia, and Japan. India has also mobilized its military in the region to counter any future Chinese development that may occur.

US’ Interest in the Matter

However, seeing all this depicts that the US is trying to perpetuate India. The US has been trying to counter China in the region. To do so, India serves as the best ally. Nonetheless, it is still yet to see how well the Indo-European collaboration will work against the rise of China in the region.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »