India’s economic realities of a war with China

India’s economic realities of a war with China

The clash between India and China last week was the worst in the last 45 years. India’s economic realities of a war with China could lead to devastating economic repercussions for both countries. Economic ties between the two countries stand at around 86 billion dollars. With China India’s second-largest trade partner and Chinese imports at present stand at 70.3 billion dollars. From social media, telecom, mobile industry, startups to pharma industry Chinese firms run deep into the Indian economy. Beijing has up till now grabbed around three- fourths of New Delhi’s mobile industry and supplied over 75% of its power sector equipment. India’s bulk drug industry and intermediaries of around 68% come directly from China.

India’s economic realities of war with China

Moreover, Chinese investors have invested more than 4 billion dollars in the Indian startup industry with 18 of India’s 30 unicorns (A unicorn is a privately held startup company valued at over $1 billion) are Chinese-funded. Another strategic advantage that China holds is her consumption-based growing domestic market. Many speculate that in 2020 China will become the largest consumer market in the world with consumption standing at 5 trillion dollars. It has leapfrogged its consumption capacities in many consumer categories. With more than a billion consumers, surely China remains one of the top destinations for global MNCs to invest. Hence, New Delhi will find a hard time boycotting Beijing economically. China supplies crucial inputs for many important sectors in India.

A small example may include that almost 70% of all APIs in the pharma industry for India come from China. A minute disruption in the supply chain would cause a loss of around 39 billion dollars to the Indian pharma industry. India directly imports around 27% of the components from China directly. Another pertinent example is the auto industry, where  In the electronic industry. India’s dependence on China is as high as 43%, meanwhile, in the garments and textile industry, the dependence stands at 27%. Moreover, China supplies 78% of solar equipment to India. Which in turn has increased her capacity from 3000 MW in 2015 to 38000 MW? Further,  the cost to produce has also been reduced to RS3 from RS 7 in 2015.

Conclusion

Hence, shifting these supply chains towards other ASEAN countries may not help. As other countries may start to import more from China to fulfill India’s growing demand. Thus, a real economic war with China would cause havoc to the Indian economy at large. Conclusively, starting a war on the economic front may seem profitable only for the peanut gallery audience.

Muhammad Ammar Alam

Muhammad Ammar Alam, a graduate of the School of Economics, Quaid-e-Azam University Islamabad, specializes in political and development economics.

Recent

What is the Durand Line?

What is the Durand Line?

The Durand Line, a 2,670-kilometer border drawn in 1893 between Afghanistan and British India, remains one of South Asia’s many contentious frontiers. Rejected by every Afghan government but recognized internationally, it symbolizes the region’s colonial legacy and ongoing power struggles. This backgrounder explores its origins in the Great Game, the legal and political controversies surrounding it, and its lasting impact on Pakistan-Afghanistan relations and regional security.

Read More »
Can war against terror be won without political consensus?

Can war against terror be won without political consensus?

For over two decades, Pakistan has battled the scourge of terrorism. Yet, despite military successes, the absence of political consensus continues to jeopardize lasting peace. As divisions deepen and populist narratives gain ground, the question remains: can Pakistan truly defeat terror without unity at the top?

Read More »
Shifting Sands: How Multipolar Pragmatism Is Redefining Global Alliances

Shifting Sands: How Multipolar Pragmatism Is Redefining Global Alliances

The world is entering an era of multipolar pragmatism where ideology no longer defines alliances. From NATO’s internal divides to BRICS expansion and regional realignments, states now pursue transactional partnerships driven by national interests. This fluid diplomacy creates both opportunities for middle powers and uncertainty in global governance.

Read More »
Afghan Taliban and Cross Border Terrorism in Pakistan

Afghan Taliban and Cross Border Terrorism in Pakistan

Pakistan is witnessing a sharp rise in terrorist attacks linked to the Afghan Taliban’s support for the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). A new study reveals that Afghan nationals now dominate TTP infiltration groups, exposing Kabul’s complicity in cross-border militancy. As violence escalates, Islamabad must balance border control, diplomacy, and de-radicalisation to counter

Read More »
The New Normal: End of Pakistan’s Strategic Restraint

The New Normal: End of Pakistan’s Strategic Restraint

Any hope surrounding the Pakistan–Afghanistan dialogue in Doha is colliding with renewed violence and mutual distrust. Pakistan’s recent precision strikes in Paktika, following a shattered ceasefire and terrorist attacks, signal a shift toward active defense. The talks now hinge on whether Kabul can curb militant sanctuaries and move beyond its victim narrative.

Read More »