India’s economic realities of a war with China

India’s economic realities of a war with China

The clash between India and China last week was the worst in the last 45 years. India’s economic realities of a war with China could lead to devastating economic repercussions for both countries. Economic ties between the two countries stand at around 86 billion dollars. With China India’s second-largest trade partner and Chinese imports at present stand at 70.3 billion dollars. From social media, telecom, mobile industry, startups to pharma industry Chinese firms run deep into the Indian economy. Beijing has up till now grabbed around three- fourths of New Delhi’s mobile industry and supplied over 75% of its power sector equipment. India’s bulk drug industry and intermediaries of around 68% come directly from China.

India’s economic realities of war with China

Moreover, Chinese investors have invested more than 4 billion dollars in the Indian startup industry with 18 of India’s 30 unicorns (A unicorn is a privately held startup company valued at over $1 billion) are Chinese-funded. Another strategic advantage that China holds is her consumption-based growing domestic market. Many speculate that in 2020 China will become the largest consumer market in the world with consumption standing at 5 trillion dollars. It has leapfrogged its consumption capacities in many consumer categories. With more than a billion consumers, surely China remains one of the top destinations for global MNCs to invest. Hence, New Delhi will find a hard time boycotting Beijing economically. China supplies crucial inputs for many important sectors in India.

A small example may include that almost 70% of all APIs in the pharma industry for India come from China. A minute disruption in the supply chain would cause a loss of around 39 billion dollars to the Indian pharma industry. India directly imports around 27% of the components from China directly. Another pertinent example is the auto industry, where  In the electronic industry. India’s dependence on China is as high as 43%, meanwhile, in the garments and textile industry, the dependence stands at 27%. Moreover, China supplies 78% of solar equipment to India. Which in turn has increased her capacity from 3000 MW in 2015 to 38000 MW? Further,  the cost to produce has also been reduced to RS3 from RS 7 in 2015.

Conclusion

Hence, shifting these supply chains towards other ASEAN countries may not help. As other countries may start to import more from China to fulfill India’s growing demand. Thus, a real economic war with China would cause havoc to the Indian economy at large. Conclusively, starting a war on the economic front may seem profitable only for the peanut gallery audience.

Muhammad Ammar Alam

Muhammad Ammar Alam, a graduate of the School of Economics, Quaid-e-Azam University Islamabad, specializes in political and development economics.

Recent

The End of Liberal Internationalism

The End of Liberal Internationalism

The 2025 U.S. National Security Strategy marks a decisive break from the post-1945 liberal order, replacing globalism and multilateralism with a neo-Westphalian focus on sovereign nation-states, fortified borders, and exclusionary spheres of influence. It signals America’s retreat from global leadership and the return of great-power rivalry.

Read More »
A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »