Indian continuation of state terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir

Pakistan has categorically rejected India\’s malicious assertions based on a complete distortion of facts to advance its false and self-serving narrative in which the remarks of Prime Minister Imran Khan have been completely twisted by the Indian Ministry of External Affairs.

The Foreign Office Spokesperson, in an announcement today (Monday), said that this mischievous attempt is profoundly condemnable.

The Spokesperson said that the Indian Ministry of External Affairs\’ announcement on Friday is a continuation of their frantic battle to redirect worldwide consideration from India\’s state terrorism in Indian Occupied Jammu and Kashmir and its proceeding with wrongdoings against the Kashmiri individuals.

She said Pakistan has been the principal victim of terrorism, including terrorism perpetrated against our people from across the border and tens of thousands of our citizens have lost their lives, while thousands of our valiant law enforcement personnel have made the ultimate sacrifice in Pakistan\’s resolute fight against terrorism. She said Pakistan\’s sacrifices and contribution to combating the scourge of terrorism have been recognized by the international community.

The representative said Senior Indian authorities and other Indian commentators have frequently boasted about destabilizing parts of Pakistan and their nefarious designs to use terrorism as state policy against Pakistan. She said today, the Hindutva-driven saffron terror against India\’s minorities, Indian state-terrorism in Indian Occupied Jammu and Kashmir, and India\’s use of terrorism as an instrument to destabilize its neighbors stands fully exposed.

She said it is India that is looking to twist and distort the report of the UN Security Council\’s Analytical Support and Sanctions Monitoring Team to promote its anti-Pakistan propaganda. We are sure that the world community will not be misled.

The Foreign Office said that Pakistan\’s job as a facilitator to the continuous peace process in Afghanistan has been broadly recognized worldwide. Pakistan has, since the start of the Afghan Peace process, alarmed the world about the role of spoilers region, who do not wish to see peace, stability and prosperity return to Afghanistan and waste no opportunity to create obstacles in the successful advancement of the peace process

Pakistan wishes to reiterate that all relevant partner countries must guard against such attempts while supporting the process for an inclusive and comprehensive political settlement in Afghanistan.

Muhammed Saad

Muhammed Saad

Muhammed Saad, an author and independent researcher, focuses his inquiries on matters concerning regional affairs.

Recent

From The Periphery to the Center: What People at Our Margins Endure

The South Asia Times (SAT) hosted a national webinar titled “From the Periphery to the Center: What People at Our Margins Endure,” spotlighting how Pakistan’s border regions, Balochistan, Gilgit-Baltistan, Azad Jammu & Kashmir, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, face deep-rooted governance challenges, economic neglect, and communication voids. Experts called for shifting from a security-centric to an inclusion-driven policy model to rebuild trust, empower youth, and turn Pakistan’s peripheries into engines of national resilience.

Read More »

The Indian Muslim: Living Between Faith and Fear

In September 2025, a simple expression of faith became a crime. When a devotional social media trend, the ‘I Love Muhammad’ campaign, went viral, it was deliberately framed as a provocation by authorities. The state’s response was swift and brutal: mass arrests and punitive demolitions that turned a peaceful act of devotion into a national flashpoint, revealing a clear intent to police and punish Muslim identity itself.

Read More »
Pakistan’s Stability: A Silent Pillar of US Strategic Interests

Pakistan’s Stability: A Silent Pillar of US Strategic Interests

Long seen through a security lens, Pakistan is now redefining its role in US strategy, as a supplier of critical minerals, a connectivity hub between Central and South Asia, and a stabilizing force in a volatile region. Amid global competition with China and shifting energy dynamics, Washington increasingly views Pakistan’s stability not as a choice but as a strategic necessity anchoring its economic and geopolitical interests across Asia.

Read More »
The Nobel Peace Prize or War Prize? A History of Controversial Laureates.

The Nobel Peace Prize or War Prize? A History of Controversial Laureates

Far from being an impartial recognition of pacifism, the Nobel Peace Prize’s legacy is marred by controversial laureates whose actions have been linked to immense violence. The prize is not a universal arbiter of peace but a political instrument reflecting a Western-centric worldview, rewarding figures who align with its geopolitical interests, regardless of the blood on their hands.

Read More »