India ranked 168th out of 180 countries in the 2020 Environmental Performance Index (EPI), researchers at Yale and Columbia University say the country faces serious environmental health risks, including poor air quality
In the 2020 EPI – a biennial scorecard of national results on a range of sustainability issues – Denmark has ranked first in the world, followed by Luxembourg, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, France, Austria, Finland, Sweden, Norway and Germany in the top 10 countries. While Japan has ranked 12th, the United States of America ranks 24th, and China stands at 120th.
The survey is conducted by researchers at Yale and Columbia universities. They say India’s decarburization agenda needs to accelerate. The EPI report has now become the premier metrics framework for global environmental policy analysis. It ranks 180 countries on 32 performance indicators across 11 issue categories. It covers both environmental health and ecosystem vitality. As per the researchers, countries which scored higher, generally exhibit long-term commitments and carefully constructed programs to protect public health, conserve natural resources, and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Looking at South Asia, Bhutan and Sri Lanka have done relatively better, scoring 107th and 109th places respectively. They are followed by Maldives (127th), Pakistan (142nd), Nepal (145th), and Bangladesh (162nd). India comes in near the bottom of the global rankings at 168th place worldwide, and only Afghanistan (178th place) ranks below India in Southern Asia.
For air quality, India and Pakistan both rank at the very bottom of the 2020 EPI, at 179th and 180th places, respectively. On biodiversity and habitat, India places 148th in the world, failing to maximize the conservation potential of its protected areas, especially in marine ecosystems.
Perhaps the most worrisome is that India places 106th in the world on climate change mitigation.
The 2020 EPI reveals that global progress on climate change has been halting. Despite its high regional ranking in the 2020 EPI, Sri Lanka\’s climate change score dropped by 12.5 out of 100 over the past ten years, due to heavy reliance on fossil fuels. India\’s score has also dropped, where as China’s has improved. Meeting the goals set out in the 2015 Paris Climate Change Agreement requires sustained cuts in emissions of all greenhouse gases, and the 2020 EPI finds that no country is decarbonizing quickly enough to meet these climate change goals. Some of India\’s neighbors do excel on individual greenhouse gas reductions, most notably Sri Lanka on methane and Pakistan on fluorinated gases, the EPI noted.
India Ranks 168th on Environmental Performance Index
India ranked 168th out of 180 countries in the 2020 Environmental Performance Index (EPI), researchers at Yale and Columbia University say the country faces serious environmental health risks, including poor air quality
In the 2020 EPI – a biennial scorecard of national results on a range of sustainability issues – Denmark has ranked first in the world, followed by Luxembourg, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, France, Austria, Finland, Sweden, Norway and Germany in the top 10 countries. While Japan has ranked 12th, the United States of America ranks 24th, and China stands at 120th.
The survey is conducted by researchers at Yale and Columbia universities. They say India’s decarburization agenda needs to accelerate. The EPI report has now become the premier metrics framework for global environmental policy analysis. It ranks 180 countries on 32 performance indicators across 11 issue categories. It covers both environmental health and ecosystem vitality. As per the researchers, countries which scored higher, generally exhibit long-term commitments and carefully constructed programs to protect public health, conserve natural resources, and reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. Looking at South Asia, Bhutan and Sri Lanka have done relatively better, scoring 107th and 109th places respectively. They are followed by Maldives (127th), Pakistan (142nd), Nepal (145th), and Bangladesh (162nd). India comes in near the bottom of the global rankings at 168th place worldwide, and only Afghanistan (178th place) ranks below India in Southern Asia.
For air quality, India and Pakistan both rank at the very bottom of the 2020 EPI, at 179th and 180th places, respectively. On biodiversity and habitat, India places 148th in the world, failing to maximize the conservation potential of its protected areas, especially in marine ecosystems.
Perhaps the most worrisome is that India places 106th in the world on climate change mitigation.
The 2020 EPI reveals that global progress on climate change has been halting. Despite its high regional ranking in the 2020 EPI, Sri Lanka\’s climate change score dropped by 12.5 out of 100 over the past ten years, due to heavy reliance on fossil fuels. India\’s score has also dropped, where as China’s has improved. Meeting the goals set out in the 2015 Paris Climate Change Agreement requires sustained cuts in emissions of all greenhouse gases, and the 2020 EPI finds that no country is decarbonizing quickly enough to meet these climate change goals. Some of India\’s neighbors do excel on individual greenhouse gas reductions, most notably Sri Lanka on methane and Pakistan on fluorinated gases, the EPI noted.
News Desk
News Desk
Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.
Recent
Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground
A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.
Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion
Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy
Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.
We Want Deliverance
Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.
Nuclear Technology at COP30: What It Means for Pakistan’s Clean Energy Goals
At COP30, nuclear energy emerged as a key solution for global clean-energy transitions. For Pakistan, expanding nuclear power, especially through Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), offers a path to cleaner, reliable electricity, despite challenges like high costs and restricted technology access.