Imran Khan’s Ultimatum: Call for Sit-In

The defiant ex-Prime Minister of Pakistan and the leader of Pakistan Tehrik-i-Insaf (PTI), Imran Khan, has given an ultimatum to the government of Pakistan to announce polls in the country in six days’ time, or he will return to the capital city with millions of people for a sit-in that was called off this very morning. He made this call while addressing a rally of his supporters at the Jinnah Avenue of the capital city, Islamabad. “I had decided that I will sit here until the government dissolves assemblies and announces elections, but of what I have seen in the past 24 hours, they (government) are taking the nation towards anarchy,” said Imran Khan while calling off the sit-in and protests.

He and his supporters marched towards the capital with the intention of a sit-in but the march, the Azadi March, had to face a severe crackdown from the police. Owing to the situation that emerged, Imran Khan called off the sit-in and asked his supporters to return. He, himself, travelled from Peshawar to Islamabad while his supporters were coming from many different parts of the country. The government, earlier, announced a ban on the rally from happening in Islamabad and this led to blockades for and crack down on the protesters coming to Islamabad. Tear gas was also used by the police and authorities to scatter the crowds of IK’s supporters.

In April, Imran Khan faced a removal from the PM office owing to a no confidence motion moved by the opposition, which he allegedly called a ‘foreign conspiracy.’ He and his supporters took to streets and many rallies were held in different cities prior to the sit-in call in Islamabad. The political landscape in the country remains uncertain and volatile since the PDM launched a movement to out-turn the former government of PTI. Reactionary politics is outweighing the issues that concern the country on an immediate economic basis, including inflation.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »