Hamas Official Welcomes Trump’s Apparent Retreat On Call To Displace Gazans

Hamas welcomes Trump’s apparent retreat from displacing Palestinians from Gaza as ceasefire talks continue amid Israel’s blockade. [Image via Reuters]

Hamas spokesperson Hazem Qassem has welcomed United States President Donald Trump’s apparent retreat from his proposed permanent displacement of more than two million Palestinians from Gaza.

The statement by the Hamas official came after Trump said on Wednesday that “nobody is expelling any Palestinians from Gaza” in response to a question during a meeting in the White House with Ireland’s Taoiseach Micheal Martin.

“If US President Trump’s statements represent a retreat from any idea of ​​displacing the people of the Gaza Strip, they are welcomed,” Qassem said in the statement.

“We call for this position to be reinforced by obligating the Israeli occupation to implement all the terms of the ceasefire agreements,” he added.

Trump sent shockwaves throughout the Middle East and beyond last month when he proposed a US takeover of Gaza and suggested that the war-torn territory’s Palestinian population be permanently displaced to live in neighbouring countries.

Trump’s apparent reversal came after Arab foreign ministers met in Qatar on Wednesday with the US’s Middle East envoy Steve Witkoff to discuss reconstruction for Gaza.

Foreign ministers from Qatar, Jordan, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirates and the secretary-general of the Palestine Liberation Organization were present at the meeting, according to a statement from Qatar’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs.

“The Arab foreign ministers discussed the Gaza reconstruction plan, which was approved at the Arab League Summit held in Cairo on March 4, 2025,” the ministry said.

“They also agreed with the US envoy to continue consultations and coordination on this plan as a basis for the reconstruction efforts in the sector,” it added.

On Saturday, the 57-member Organisation of Islamic Cooperation (OIC) formally adopted a plan for Gaza put forward by the Arab League at an emergency meeting in Saudi Arabia. The Egyptian-spearheaded initiative emerged as a proposal to rebuild the Gaza Strip under the future administration of the Palestinian Authority in response to Trump’s threat to take over Gaza and empty the territory of its residents.

Also See: Arab Leaders Endorse Counterproposal To Trump’s Gaza Plan

Gaza ceasefire talks

A new round of talks on a ceasefire in Gaza also began in Qatar on Tuesday, with Witkoff dispatched to Doha for the mediations.

“The Arab ministers emphasised the importance of maintaining the ceasefire in Gaza and the occupied Palestinian territories, stressing the need for genuine efforts to achieve a just and comprehensive peace based on the two-state solution, ensuring the fulfilment of the Palestinian people’s aspirations for freedom and independence,” the Qatari Foreign Ministry statement added.

On Sunday, Taher al-Nono, a political adviser to the Hamas leadership, confirmed unprecedented, direct talks with Washington in the Qatari capital focused on the release of an American-Israeli dual national being held by the armed group in Gaza.

Al-Nono said the meetings between Hamas leaders and the US’s hostage negotiator, Adam Boehler, had also discussed how to see through the implementation of the phased ceasefire agreement between Hamas and Israel aimed at ending the war on Gaza.

The direct discussions between Boehler and Hamas broke with a decades-old policy by Washington against negotiating with groups that the US brands as “terrorist organisations”.

A Hamas delegation has also met over the past two days with Egyptian mediators and reaffirmed its readiness to negotiate the next phase of the ceasefire with Israel, while Israel sent negotiators to Doha on Monday for ceasefire talks.

The 42-day first phase of the Gaza ceasefire deal expired earlier this month without agreement from Israel on subsequent stages meant to secure a lasting end to its war on Gaza.

Israel has since imposed a complete blockade on Gaza, which has entered a 12th day and includes preventing the entry of food, fuel and medicines to the territory in what has been described as an act of collective punishment and Israel’s “weaponisation of humanitarian aid” to pressure Hamas.

This news is sourced from Al Jazeera and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

From The Periphery to the Center: What People at Our Margins Endure

The South Asia Times (SAT) hosted a national webinar titled “From the Periphery to the Center: What People at Our Margins Endure,” spotlighting how Pakistan’s border regions, Balochistan, Gilgit-Baltistan, Azad Jammu & Kashmir, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, face deep-rooted governance challenges, economic neglect, and communication voids. Experts called for shifting from a security-centric to an inclusion-driven policy model to rebuild trust, empower youth, and turn Pakistan’s peripheries into engines of national resilience.

Read More »

The Indian Muslim: Living Between Faith and Fear

In September 2025, a simple expression of faith became a crime. When a devotional social media trend, the ‘I Love Muhammad’ campaign, went viral, it was deliberately framed as a provocation by authorities. The state’s response was swift and brutal: mass arrests and punitive demolitions that turned a peaceful act of devotion into a national flashpoint, revealing a clear intent to police and punish Muslim identity itself.

Read More »
Pakistan’s Stability: A Silent Pillar of US Strategic Interests

Pakistan’s Stability: A Silent Pillar of US Strategic Interests

Long seen through a security lens, Pakistan is now redefining its role in US strategy, as a supplier of critical minerals, a connectivity hub between Central and South Asia, and a stabilizing force in a volatile region. Amid global competition with China and shifting energy dynamics, Washington increasingly views Pakistan’s stability not as a choice but as a strategic necessity anchoring its economic and geopolitical interests across Asia.

Read More »
The Nobel Peace Prize or War Prize? A History of Controversial Laureates.

The Nobel Peace Prize or War Prize? A History of Controversial Laureates

Far from being an impartial recognition of pacifism, the Nobel Peace Prize’s legacy is marred by controversial laureates whose actions have been linked to immense violence. The prize is not a universal arbiter of peace but a political instrument reflecting a Western-centric worldview, rewarding figures who align with its geopolitical interests, regardless of the blood on their hands.

Read More »