In the backrooms of South Asia’s power corridors, whispers of India’s covert operations have long persisted. From fueling insurgencies to propping up political allies, New Delhi’s intelligence agency, the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), has been accused of shaping the region’s conflicts to serve its strategic ambitions. While India presents itself as the region’s democratic powerhouse, allegations of interference in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and Myanmar tell a different story—one where national sovereignty is often compromised in the name of regional dominance.
Sri Lanka: The Lingering Ghost of Civil War
In the 1980s, RAW’s covert wars turned South Asia into a battlefield, from training LTTE in Sri Lanka to fueling insurgencies in Myanmar and Bangladesh. India provided support to Tamil militant groups, including the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), with training camps in Tamil Nadu, significantly escalating the Sri Lankan Civil War.
The Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF), sent in 1987 to enforce a peace agreement, quickly turned into an occupying force, facing fierce resistance from the very groups India had once backed. India’s meddling in Sri Lanka didn’t just end with the LTTE—its fingerprints are all over decades of bloodshed and chaos. The scars of this intervention still linger in Colombo’s political circles.
Bangladesh: The Iron Grip of ‘Big Brother’
While India played a critical role in Bangladesh’s liberation in 1971, allegations of political meddling have shadowed its relationship with Dhaka ever since. Critics argue that New Delhi’s influence over the ruling Awami League government has turned Bangladesh into a proxy state.
The Indian Border Security Force (BSF) has turned the Bangladesh border into an execution zone, slaughtering civilians without consequences. Rights groups have documented hundreds of civilian deaths at the hands of BSF personnel, raising alarm over India’s militarization of the border.
Meanwhile, Sheikh Hasina’s government has been accused of suppressing opposition voices under India’s watchful eye. Hasina’s downfall is a nightmare for India, as Bangladesh finally rejects the iron grip of its so-called “big brother.” As Bangladesh approaches a political transition, India’s influence could be at risk, leading to potential shifts in regional alliances.
Myanmar: The Arms Dealer of a Military Junta
India’s northeastern states share a porous border with Myanmar, a region long plagued by insurgent activity. While India claims to support democracy in Myanmar, it has maintained deep military ties with Myanmar’s junta, supplying arms and defense equipment despite international condemnation.
India’s arms factories have been working overtime, fueling Myanmar’s military junta with the tools to commit war crimes. A UN report exposed India as a key supplier of military hardware to Myanmar’s junta, even as the regime cracks down on pro-democracy activists.
New Delhi’s double game is exposed—arming Myanmar’s junta while pretending to champion human rights on the world stage.
Shifting Tides: India’s Influence Faces Pushback
Recent geopolitical developments signal potential shifts in India’s regional influence:
New Delhi extended an unprecedented invitation to Myanmar’s anti-junta forces for a seminar in September 2024, a move seen as a tactical shift to hedge its bets.
The election of Anura Kumara Dissanayake in Sri Lanka in 2024 is viewed as realignment of Colombo’s foreign relations, potentially moving away from India’s orbit.
As South Asia’s political landscape evolves, India’s covert influence is being challenged like never before.
Also See: India, Cyber Espionage, and Political Influence: What Canada’s Report Unveils
South Asia’s Biggest Threat?
The BJP government cries foul over foreign interference, yet its own intelligence agencies have been orchestrating chaos in neighboring states for decades.
While India presents itself as a stabilizing force in South Asia, its covert operations, political maneuvering, and military dealings tell a different story—one that has left behind a trail of instability. South Asia’s biggest threat isn’t terrorism—it’s India’s relentless interference, fueling wars, propping up dictators, and destabilizing entire nations.
As Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and Myanmar reassess their political futures, the question remains: Will India continue to pull the strings, or is its regional dominance beginning to unravel?
Disclaimer: SAT Commentary is an independent analysis and commentary on developments, trends, and happenings published by South Asia Times (SAT). It provides insights into regional trends, geopolitical developments, and emerging narratives. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the institution’s official stance.
From Sri Lanka to Myanmar: India’s Shadow Wars
In the backrooms of South Asia’s power corridors, whispers of India’s covert operations have long persisted. From fueling insurgencies to propping up political allies, New Delhi’s intelligence agency, the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), has been accused of shaping the region’s conflicts to serve its strategic ambitions. While India presents itself as the region’s democratic powerhouse, allegations of interference in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and Myanmar tell a different story—one where national sovereignty is often compromised in the name of regional dominance.
Sri Lanka: The Lingering Ghost of Civil War
In the 1980s, RAW’s covert wars turned South Asia into a battlefield, from training LTTE in Sri Lanka to fueling insurgencies in Myanmar and Bangladesh. India provided support to Tamil militant groups, including the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), with training camps in Tamil Nadu, significantly escalating the Sri Lankan Civil War.
The Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF), sent in 1987 to enforce a peace agreement, quickly turned into an occupying force, facing fierce resistance from the very groups India had once backed. India’s meddling in Sri Lanka didn’t just end with the LTTE—its fingerprints are all over decades of bloodshed and chaos. The scars of this intervention still linger in Colombo’s political circles.
Bangladesh: The Iron Grip of ‘Big Brother’
While India played a critical role in Bangladesh’s liberation in 1971, allegations of political meddling have shadowed its relationship with Dhaka ever since. Critics argue that New Delhi’s influence over the ruling Awami League government has turned Bangladesh into a proxy state.
The Indian Border Security Force (BSF) has turned the Bangladesh border into an execution zone, slaughtering civilians without consequences. Rights groups have documented hundreds of civilian deaths at the hands of BSF personnel, raising alarm over India’s militarization of the border.
Meanwhile, Sheikh Hasina’s government has been accused of suppressing opposition voices under India’s watchful eye. Hasina’s downfall is a nightmare for India, as Bangladesh finally rejects the iron grip of its so-called “big brother.” As Bangladesh approaches a political transition, India’s influence could be at risk, leading to potential shifts in regional alliances.
Myanmar: The Arms Dealer of a Military Junta
India’s northeastern states share a porous border with Myanmar, a region long plagued by insurgent activity. While India claims to support democracy in Myanmar, it has maintained deep military ties with Myanmar’s junta, supplying arms and defense equipment despite international condemnation.
India’s arms factories have been working overtime, fueling Myanmar’s military junta with the tools to commit war crimes. A UN report exposed India as a key supplier of military hardware to Myanmar’s junta, even as the regime cracks down on pro-democracy activists.
New Delhi’s double game is exposed—arming Myanmar’s junta while pretending to champion human rights on the world stage.
Shifting Tides: India’s Influence Faces Pushback
Recent geopolitical developments signal potential shifts in India’s regional influence:
New Delhi extended an unprecedented invitation to Myanmar’s anti-junta forces for a seminar in September 2024, a move seen as a tactical shift to hedge its bets.
The election of Anura Kumara Dissanayake in Sri Lanka in 2024 is viewed as realignment of Colombo’s foreign relations, potentially moving away from India’s orbit.
As South Asia’s political landscape evolves, India’s covert influence is being challenged like never before.
Also See: India, Cyber Espionage, and Political Influence: What Canada’s Report Unveils
South Asia’s Biggest Threat?
The BJP government cries foul over foreign interference, yet its own intelligence agencies have been orchestrating chaos in neighboring states for decades.
While India presents itself as a stabilizing force in South Asia, its covert operations, political maneuvering, and military dealings tell a different story—one that has left behind a trail of instability. South Asia’s biggest threat isn’t terrorism—it’s India’s relentless interference, fueling wars, propping up dictators, and destabilizing entire nations.
As Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and Myanmar reassess their political futures, the question remains: Will India continue to pull the strings, or is its regional dominance beginning to unravel?
Disclaimer: SAT Commentary is an independent analysis and commentary on developments, trends, and happenings published by South Asia Times (SAT). It provides insights into regional trends, geopolitical developments, and emerging narratives. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the institution’s official stance.
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.
Recent
Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground
A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.
Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion
Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy
Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.
We Want Deliverance
Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.
Nuclear Technology at COP30: What It Means for Pakistan’s Clean Energy Goals
At COP30, nuclear energy emerged as a key solution for global clean-energy transitions. For Pakistan, expanding nuclear power, especially through Small Modular Reactors (SMRs), offers a path to cleaner, reliable electricity, despite challenges like high costs and restricted technology access.