In the backrooms of South Asia’s power corridors, whispers of India’s covert operations have long persisted. From fueling insurgencies to propping up political allies, New Delhi’s intelligence agency, the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), has been accused of shaping the region’s conflicts to serve its strategic ambitions. While India presents itself as the region’s democratic powerhouse, allegations of interference in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and Myanmar tell a different story—one where national sovereignty is often compromised in the name of regional dominance.
Sri Lanka: The Lingering Ghost of Civil War
In the 1980s, RAW’s covert wars turned South Asia into a battlefield, from training LTTE in Sri Lanka to fueling insurgencies in Myanmar and Bangladesh. India provided support to Tamil militant groups, including the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), with training camps in Tamil Nadu, significantly escalating the Sri Lankan Civil War.
The Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF), sent in 1987 to enforce a peace agreement, quickly turned into an occupying force, facing fierce resistance from the very groups India had once backed. India’s meddling in Sri Lanka didn’t just end with the LTTE—its fingerprints are all over decades of bloodshed and chaos. The scars of this intervention still linger in Colombo’s political circles.
Bangladesh: The Iron Grip of ‘Big Brother’
While India played a critical role in Bangladesh’s liberation in 1971, allegations of political meddling have shadowed its relationship with Dhaka ever since. Critics argue that New Delhi’s influence over the ruling Awami League government has turned Bangladesh into a proxy state.
The Indian Border Security Force (BSF) has turned the Bangladesh border into an execution zone, slaughtering civilians without consequences. Rights groups have documented hundreds of civilian deaths at the hands of BSF personnel, raising alarm over India’s militarization of the border.
Meanwhile, Sheikh Hasina’s government has been accused of suppressing opposition voices under India’s watchful eye. Hasina’s downfall is a nightmare for India, as Bangladesh finally rejects the iron grip of its so-called “big brother.” As Bangladesh approaches a political transition, India’s influence could be at risk, leading to potential shifts in regional alliances.
Myanmar: The Arms Dealer of a Military Junta
India’s northeastern states share a porous border with Myanmar, a region long plagued by insurgent activity. While India claims to support democracy in Myanmar, it has maintained deep military ties with Myanmar’s junta, supplying arms and defense equipment despite international condemnation.
India’s arms factories have been working overtime, fueling Myanmar’s military junta with the tools to commit war crimes. A UN report exposed India as a key supplier of military hardware to Myanmar’s junta, even as the regime cracks down on pro-democracy activists.
New Delhi’s double game is exposed—arming Myanmar’s junta while pretending to champion human rights on the world stage.
Shifting Tides: India’s Influence Faces Pushback
Recent geopolitical developments signal potential shifts in India’s regional influence:
New Delhi extended an unprecedented invitation to Myanmar’s anti-junta forces for a seminar in September 2024, a move seen as a tactical shift to hedge its bets.
The election of Anura Kumara Dissanayake in Sri Lanka in 2024 is viewed as realignment of Colombo’s foreign relations, potentially moving away from India’s orbit.
As South Asia’s political landscape evolves, India’s covert influence is being challenged like never before.
Also See: India, Cyber Espionage, and Political Influence: What Canada’s Report Unveils
South Asia’s Biggest Threat?
The BJP government cries foul over foreign interference, yet its own intelligence agencies have been orchestrating chaos in neighboring states for decades.
While India presents itself as a stabilizing force in South Asia, its covert operations, political maneuvering, and military dealings tell a different story—one that has left behind a trail of instability. South Asia’s biggest threat isn’t terrorism—it’s India’s relentless interference, fueling wars, propping up dictators, and destabilizing entire nations.
As Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and Myanmar reassess their political futures, the question remains: Will India continue to pull the strings, or is its regional dominance beginning to unravel?
Disclaimer: SAT Commentary is an independent analysis and commentary on developments, trends, and happenings published by South Asia Times (SAT). It provides insights into regional trends, geopolitical developments, and emerging narratives. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the institution’s official stance.
From Sri Lanka to Myanmar: India’s Shadow Wars
In the backrooms of South Asia’s power corridors, whispers of India’s covert operations have long persisted. From fueling insurgencies to propping up political allies, New Delhi’s intelligence agency, the Research and Analysis Wing (RAW), has been accused of shaping the region’s conflicts to serve its strategic ambitions. While India presents itself as the region’s democratic powerhouse, allegations of interference in Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and Myanmar tell a different story—one where national sovereignty is often compromised in the name of regional dominance.
Sri Lanka: The Lingering Ghost of Civil War
In the 1980s, RAW’s covert wars turned South Asia into a battlefield, from training LTTE in Sri Lanka to fueling insurgencies in Myanmar and Bangladesh. India provided support to Tamil militant groups, including the Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE), with training camps in Tamil Nadu, significantly escalating the Sri Lankan Civil War.
The Indian Peace Keeping Force (IPKF), sent in 1987 to enforce a peace agreement, quickly turned into an occupying force, facing fierce resistance from the very groups India had once backed. India’s meddling in Sri Lanka didn’t just end with the LTTE—its fingerprints are all over decades of bloodshed and chaos. The scars of this intervention still linger in Colombo’s political circles.
Bangladesh: The Iron Grip of ‘Big Brother’
While India played a critical role in Bangladesh’s liberation in 1971, allegations of political meddling have shadowed its relationship with Dhaka ever since. Critics argue that New Delhi’s influence over the ruling Awami League government has turned Bangladesh into a proxy state.
The Indian Border Security Force (BSF) has turned the Bangladesh border into an execution zone, slaughtering civilians without consequences. Rights groups have documented hundreds of civilian deaths at the hands of BSF personnel, raising alarm over India’s militarization of the border.
Meanwhile, Sheikh Hasina’s government has been accused of suppressing opposition voices under India’s watchful eye. Hasina’s downfall is a nightmare for India, as Bangladesh finally rejects the iron grip of its so-called “big brother.” As Bangladesh approaches a political transition, India’s influence could be at risk, leading to potential shifts in regional alliances.
Myanmar: The Arms Dealer of a Military Junta
India’s northeastern states share a porous border with Myanmar, a region long plagued by insurgent activity. While India claims to support democracy in Myanmar, it has maintained deep military ties with Myanmar’s junta, supplying arms and defense equipment despite international condemnation.
India’s arms factories have been working overtime, fueling Myanmar’s military junta with the tools to commit war crimes. A UN report exposed India as a key supplier of military hardware to Myanmar’s junta, even as the regime cracks down on pro-democracy activists.
New Delhi’s double game is exposed—arming Myanmar’s junta while pretending to champion human rights on the world stage.
Shifting Tides: India’s Influence Faces Pushback
Recent geopolitical developments signal potential shifts in India’s regional influence:
New Delhi extended an unprecedented invitation to Myanmar’s anti-junta forces for a seminar in September 2024, a move seen as a tactical shift to hedge its bets.
The election of Anura Kumara Dissanayake in Sri Lanka in 2024 is viewed as realignment of Colombo’s foreign relations, potentially moving away from India’s orbit.
As South Asia’s political landscape evolves, India’s covert influence is being challenged like never before.
Also See: India, Cyber Espionage, and Political Influence: What Canada’s Report Unveils
South Asia’s Biggest Threat?
The BJP government cries foul over foreign interference, yet its own intelligence agencies have been orchestrating chaos in neighboring states for decades.
While India presents itself as a stabilizing force in South Asia, its covert operations, political maneuvering, and military dealings tell a different story—one that has left behind a trail of instability. South Asia’s biggest threat isn’t terrorism—it’s India’s relentless interference, fueling wars, propping up dictators, and destabilizing entire nations.
As Sri Lanka, Bangladesh, and Myanmar reassess their political futures, the question remains: Will India continue to pull the strings, or is its regional dominance beginning to unravel?
Disclaimer: SAT Commentary is an independent analysis and commentary on developments, trends, and happenings published by South Asia Times (SAT). It provides insights into regional trends, geopolitical developments, and emerging narratives. The views expressed do not necessarily reflect the institution’s official stance.
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.
Recent
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India
AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network
AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan
The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.
The Afghan Crucible
Recent reporting underscores Afghanistan’s transformation into a strategic hub for transnational jihadist networks. Far from being a localized security problem, the Afghan landscape now functions as an ideological, logistical, and digital anchor linking extremist affiliates across Africa, Southeast Asia, and beyond, signaling the collapse of regional containment and the rise of a globalized threat architecture.
Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics
Strategic competition has moved beyond decisive wars toward a subtler synthesis of economic leverage, proxy networks, and calibrated force. Infrastructure, finance, and trade routes now function as instruments of power, quietly reshaping regional orders while preserving the façade of restraint. In this environment, security is no longer confined to the battlefield but embedded in supply chains, data networks, and development choices, forcing states to rethink deterrence, sovereignty, and resilience.