EU Takes Stand Against US Tariffs, Proposes 25% Retaliatory Duties

EU backs first retaliatory tariffs on US goods over Trump's levies, targeting $24B in imports across three phases. [Image via Xinhua]

BRUSSELS — European Union (EU) member states on Wednesday backed the bloc’s first package of retaliatory measures against US President Donald Trump’s tariffs.

In a statement, the European Commission condemned the US tariffs as “unjustified and damaging, causing economic harm to both sides, as well as to the global economy.”

According to media outlets Euractiv and Politico, 26 of the bloc’s 27 member states voted in favor during Wednesday’s session, signaling overwhelming support for fighting back against Trump’s tariff measures.

The European Commission proposed the retaliatory duties on Monday, setting most of them at 25 percent. The tariffs target a range of US imports in response to Washington’s levies on steel and aluminum.

The list spans from agricultural to industrial products such as soybeans, poultry, tobacco, iron, motorcycles, dental floss, and both steel and aluminum. These goods totaled around 22 billion euros ($24.36 billion) last year.

The tariffs will be introduced in three stages. The first set, on goods like cranberries and orange juice, will take effect on April 15. A second round, covering items such as steel, meat, white chocolate, and polyethylene, will follow on May 16. The final phase, targeting almonds and soybeans, is scheduled for Dec 1.

These steps mark the EU’s initial response to the broader transatlantic trade dispute. In addition to metals, the Trump administration previously announced a 25 percent tariff on EU cars and a so-called “reciprocal” tariff of 20 percent on nearly all other EU imports.

Also See: EU Signals Readiness for Tariff-Free Trade Pact with US, But Will Retaliate If Needed

The European Commission is expected to propose additional retaliatory measures against other US tariffs as early as next week. “I expect that will happen early next week. Also early next week is the second phase of our response to US tariffs, this time on cars and reciprocal tariffs,” European Commission spokesperson Olof Gill told a press conference Tuesday.

The European Commission also repeated its preference “to find negotiated outcomes with the US, which would be balanced and mutually beneficial.”

“These countermeasures can be suspended at any time, should the US agree to a fair and balanced negotiated outcome,” it said. (1 euro = 1.11 dollar)

This news is sourced from China Daily and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

From The Periphery to the Center: What People at Our Margins Endure

The South Asia Times (SAT) hosted a national webinar titled “From the Periphery to the Center: What People at Our Margins Endure,” spotlighting how Pakistan’s border regions, Balochistan, Gilgit-Baltistan, Azad Jammu & Kashmir, and Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, face deep-rooted governance challenges, economic neglect, and communication voids. Experts called for shifting from a security-centric to an inclusion-driven policy model to rebuild trust, empower youth, and turn Pakistan’s peripheries into engines of national resilience.

Read More »

The Indian Muslim: Living Between Faith and Fear

In September 2025, a simple expression of faith became a crime. When a devotional social media trend, the ‘I Love Muhammad’ campaign, went viral, it was deliberately framed as a provocation by authorities. The state’s response was swift and brutal: mass arrests and punitive demolitions that turned a peaceful act of devotion into a national flashpoint, revealing a clear intent to police and punish Muslim identity itself.

Read More »
Pakistan’s Stability: A Silent Pillar of US Strategic Interests

Pakistan’s Stability: A Silent Pillar of US Strategic Interests

Long seen through a security lens, Pakistan is now redefining its role in US strategy, as a supplier of critical minerals, a connectivity hub between Central and South Asia, and a stabilizing force in a volatile region. Amid global competition with China and shifting energy dynamics, Washington increasingly views Pakistan’s stability not as a choice but as a strategic necessity anchoring its economic and geopolitical interests across Asia.

Read More »
The Nobel Peace Prize or War Prize? A History of Controversial Laureates.

The Nobel Peace Prize or War Prize? A History of Controversial Laureates

Far from being an impartial recognition of pacifism, the Nobel Peace Prize’s legacy is marred by controversial laureates whose actions have been linked to immense violence. The prize is not a universal arbiter of peace but a political instrument reflecting a Western-centric worldview, rewarding figures who align with its geopolitical interests, regardless of the blood on their hands.

Read More »