China Hits Back at US with 84% Tariff Hike and New Countermeasures

China hits back at US tariff hikes with 84% tariffs, export bans, and WTO complaint, vowing to defend trade interests. [Image via Xinhua]

China will raise additional tariffs on all goods imported from the United States (US) to 84%, starting at 12:01 am on Thursday, and has added 18 US entities to its export control and unreliable entity lists in order to counter the US’ unilateral tariff hikes.

Analysts said the countermeasures send a clear message that China, the world’s second-largest economy, is prepared to stand firm in defense of its legitimate interests and the rules-based multilateral trading system.

On Wednesday evening, the Ministry of Culture and Tourism and the Ministry of Education issued separate risk alert to tourists and students planning to go to the US.

Beijing’s latest moves follow Washington’s decision to increase its so-called “reciprocal tariffs” on Chinese goods to 84 percent, bringing the total additional tariffs imposed by the current Trump administration to 104 percent.

The Customs Tariff Commission of the State Council, China’s Cabinet, said in a statement on Wednesday that the US’ decision to increase tariffs on Chinese goods is “a mistake upon a mistake”.

The US’ tariff hikes, which severely infringe on China’s legitimate rights and interests, damage the rules-based multilateral trading system and destabilize the global economic order, are “a clear example of unilateralism, protectionism and economic coercion”, the commission said.

Also on Wednesday, the Ministry of Commerce announced that it has included 12 more US entities, including American Photonics and BRINC Drones, on China’s export control list, thereby effectively banning the export of dual-use items — goods that can be used for both civilian and military purposes — from China to these entities.

The ministry said it has also added six more US companies, including Shield AI and Cyberlux Corp, to China’s unreliable entity list. It means these companies are banned from trading or investing in the country.

Furthermore, China has filed a complaint with the World Trade Organization over the latest US tariff hikes, the ministry added.

Guo Kai, executive president of CF40 Institute, a research center affiliated with the think tank China Finance 40 Forum, said Beijing’s strong countermeasures have proved that Washington’s expectations of China succumbing to the pressure of US tariffs were miscalculated.

It may take some time, but Beijing’s firm stand to “fight until the end” will make Washington realize that it underestimated China’s endurance to tariffs, Guo said, underscoring that the realization would eventually bring the US back to the negotiation table.

“And when that time comes, it (the negotiation) will be on China’s terms, not on the US’ terms,” Guo added.

Also See: China Warns of Firm Retaliation Against US Over Tariff Disputes

Lin Meng, director of the modern supply chain research institute at the Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation in Beijing, noted that China’s countermeasures reflect its firm opposition to US hegemony and underscore its commitment to upholding a fair, rules-based global trading system.

“This offers other countries a reference for defending their interests through multilateralism and reinforces the importance of a rules-based global trading system amid rising unilateral pressures,” Lin said.

Li Haidong, a professor at China Foreign Affairs University’s Institute of International Relations, said the White House is playing the tariff card to advance its domestic political agenda and secure gains in the upcoming midterm elections.

“Given that China is a staunch proponent of globalization, the Trump administration is escalating the ‘tariff war’ in an attempt to overturn the multilateral trading system of the past decades and recast it in a way that preserves the US’ dominance and allows it to continue draining the rest of world,” Li said.

However, global consulting firm PwC told China Daily that the US’ “reciprocal tariff” policy may only encourage other countries to strengthen regional economic cooperation by establishing regional free trade zones and enhancing trade agreements, thereby reducing trade costs and improving supply chain stability.

Su Jian, a professor of economics at Peking University, said that for the next step, it is essential for Chinese companies to minimize related risk exposure by adjusting trade partner selection, managing order cycles, reassessing key supply chain interdependency, strengthening communication with US market partners, and preparing for future supply security and pricing mechanisms.

This news is sourced from China Daily and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »