The regional dynamics of South Asia are undergoing a stark realignment, largely driven by India’s deliberate shift away from the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) towards the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC). This strategic maneuver appears designed not just to foster new partnerships, but explicitly to circumvent and isolate Pakistan, raising profound questions about the viability of lasting peace and comprehensive cooperation in a region still grappling with deep-seated historical animosities, most notably the intractable Kashmir dispute.
India’s Disengagement: SAARC Scuttled, BIMSTEC Embraced
India’s disinterest in SAARC is less a consequence of the organization’s inherent flaws and more a calculated decision to render it defunct. For years, SAARC’s progress was indeed hampered by the bitter rivalry between India and Pakistan. However, rather than seeking to overcome these challenges within the existing multilateral framework, India effectively paralyzed SAARC, leveraging incidents like the 2016 Uri terrorist attack as justification to boycott summits and declare the forum “untenable.” This strategic withdrawal, while framed as a response to cross-border terrorism, effectively served to scuttle SAARC by depriving it of its largest and most influential member’s participation.
Simultaneously, India has aggressively promoted BIMSTEC, a grouping that conveniently excludes Pakistan (Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Thailand). This “SAARC minus Pakistan” approach is portrayed by India as aligning with its “Act East” and “Neighborhood First” policies, suggesting a focus on functional cooperation and maritime security in the Bay of Bengal. However, the underlying motive is clearly the diplomatic isolation of Pakistan within the South Asian regional architecture. India seeks to bolster its influence through this new alliance, projecting power across the Indo-Pacific, and positioning BIMSTEC as its preferred mechanism for regional engagement, thereby sidelining any forum where Pakistan might play a significant role. While BIMSTEC has shown some limited dynamism, it remains to be seen if it can truly deliver comprehensive regional integration without addressing the larger South Asian context.
Pakistan’s Counter-Narrative: SAARC Revival with Chinese Backing
In direct opposition to India’s exclusionary strategy, Pakistan remains a steadfast advocate for SAARC’s revival. Islamabad consistently champions the forum’s foundational importance in addressing shared regional challenges such as poverty, climate change, and collective security. For Pakistan, SAARC represents the only truly inclusive platform for South Asian cooperation.
Crucially, Pakistan’s push for SAARC’s resurgence is increasingly intertwined with China’s regional ambitions. Recognizing India’s dominant position, Pakistan, often supported by other smaller SAARC members, views China’s potential full membership or an enhanced role in SAARC as a vital mechanism to rebalance power dynamics. China, currently an observer, has expressed a clear interest in a more prominent position within SAARC. Pakistan actively seeks to leverage its “all-weather friendship” with Beijing, particularly through major infrastructure projects like the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), to secure Chinese backing for SAARC’s revitalization. The envisioned inclusion of China, with its immense economic and diplomatic clout, is seen by Pakistan as a means to inject renewed vigor into the dormant organization and challenge India’s attempts to dictate the terms of regional engagement.
The Elusive Peace: Why Excluding Pakistan Fails
The future of SAARC remains uncertain, largely due to India’s unwavering stance. The organization has been effectively dormant since 2014, with India insisting that no SAARC summit can take place as long as a member state is perceived to be sponsoring terrorism. This rigid position effectively holds the entire organization hostage to the India-Pakistan dynamic.
Beyond this bilateral deadlock, SAARC faces systemic challenges: the vast economic and military asymmetries between member states (particularly India’s “Big Brother” status), a cumbersome consensus-based decision-making process prone to gridlock, and a pervasive lack of trust rooted in historical disputes. Despite agreements like SAFTA, intra-regional trade remains abysmally low, reflecting a broader failure of true economic integration.
Ultimately, India’s strategy of bypassing Pakistan through BIMSTEC, while offering a pathway for cooperation with like-minded neighbors, falls short of addressing the fundamental requirements for comprehensive regional peace and stability. The intense and unresolved Kashmir issue, alongside the inherent geographical and geopolitical realities, dictates that no lasting peace or substantial regional integration can be achieved by cutting out a major power like Pakistan. The two nations, both nuclear-armed and deeply intertwined historically, must eventually find a way to engage meaningfully. Until then, the dream of a truly cooperative and prosperous South Asia remains elusive, perpetually overshadowed by unresolved conflicts and the strategic maneuvers of its most prominent players. The current geopolitical chessboard suggests that while India champions BIMSTEC, the ghost of an unfulfilled SAARC will continue to haunt the quest for a genuinely integrated South Asian future.
Can BIMSTEC Replace SAARC? The Illusion of Exclusionary Integration
The regional dynamics of South Asia are undergoing a stark realignment, largely driven by India’s deliberate shift away from the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) towards the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC). This strategic maneuver appears designed not just to foster new partnerships, but explicitly to circumvent and isolate Pakistan, raising profound questions about the viability of lasting peace and comprehensive cooperation in a region still grappling with deep-seated historical animosities, most notably the intractable Kashmir dispute.
India’s Disengagement: SAARC Scuttled, BIMSTEC Embraced
India’s disinterest in SAARC is less a consequence of the organization’s inherent flaws and more a calculated decision to render it defunct. For years, SAARC’s progress was indeed hampered by the bitter rivalry between India and Pakistan. However, rather than seeking to overcome these challenges within the existing multilateral framework, India effectively paralyzed SAARC, leveraging incidents like the 2016 Uri terrorist attack as justification to boycott summits and declare the forum “untenable.” This strategic withdrawal, while framed as a response to cross-border terrorism, effectively served to scuttle SAARC by depriving it of its largest and most influential member’s participation.
Simultaneously, India has aggressively promoted BIMSTEC, a grouping that conveniently excludes Pakistan (Bangladesh, Bhutan, India, Myanmar, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and Thailand). This “SAARC minus Pakistan” approach is portrayed by India as aligning with its “Act East” and “Neighborhood First” policies, suggesting a focus on functional cooperation and maritime security in the Bay of Bengal. However, the underlying motive is clearly the diplomatic isolation of Pakistan within the South Asian regional architecture. India seeks to bolster its influence through this new alliance, projecting power across the Indo-Pacific, and positioning BIMSTEC as its preferred mechanism for regional engagement, thereby sidelining any forum where Pakistan might play a significant role. While BIMSTEC has shown some limited dynamism, it remains to be seen if it can truly deliver comprehensive regional integration without addressing the larger South Asian context.
Pakistan’s Counter-Narrative: SAARC Revival with Chinese Backing
In direct opposition to India’s exclusionary strategy, Pakistan remains a steadfast advocate for SAARC’s revival. Islamabad consistently champions the forum’s foundational importance in addressing shared regional challenges such as poverty, climate change, and collective security. For Pakistan, SAARC represents the only truly inclusive platform for South Asian cooperation.
Crucially, Pakistan’s push for SAARC’s resurgence is increasingly intertwined with China’s regional ambitions. Recognizing India’s dominant position, Pakistan, often supported by other smaller SAARC members, views China’s potential full membership or an enhanced role in SAARC as a vital mechanism to rebalance power dynamics. China, currently an observer, has expressed a clear interest in a more prominent position within SAARC. Pakistan actively seeks to leverage its “all-weather friendship” with Beijing, particularly through major infrastructure projects like the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), to secure Chinese backing for SAARC’s revitalization. The envisioned inclusion of China, with its immense economic and diplomatic clout, is seen by Pakistan as a means to inject renewed vigor into the dormant organization and challenge India’s attempts to dictate the terms of regional engagement.
The Elusive Peace: Why Excluding Pakistan Fails
The future of SAARC remains uncertain, largely due to India’s unwavering stance. The organization has been effectively dormant since 2014, with India insisting that no SAARC summit can take place as long as a member state is perceived to be sponsoring terrorism. This rigid position effectively holds the entire organization hostage to the India-Pakistan dynamic.
Beyond this bilateral deadlock, SAARC faces systemic challenges: the vast economic and military asymmetries between member states (particularly India’s “Big Brother” status), a cumbersome consensus-based decision-making process prone to gridlock, and a pervasive lack of trust rooted in historical disputes. Despite agreements like SAFTA, intra-regional trade remains abysmally low, reflecting a broader failure of true economic integration.
Ultimately, India’s strategy of bypassing Pakistan through BIMSTEC, while offering a pathway for cooperation with like-minded neighbors, falls short of addressing the fundamental requirements for comprehensive regional peace and stability. The intense and unresolved Kashmir issue, alongside the inherent geographical and geopolitical realities, dictates that no lasting peace or substantial regional integration can be achieved by cutting out a major power like Pakistan. The two nations, both nuclear-armed and deeply intertwined historically, must eventually find a way to engage meaningfully. Until then, the dream of a truly cooperative and prosperous South Asia remains elusive, perpetually overshadowed by unresolved conflicts and the strategic maneuvers of its most prominent players. The current geopolitical chessboard suggests that while India champions BIMSTEC, the ghost of an unfulfilled SAARC will continue to haunt the quest for a genuinely integrated South Asian future.
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.
Recent
When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance
The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System
As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal
The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography
The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.
Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation
The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.