BJP\’s Masquerade about Laddakh Blown Away

Reports on Situation in Ladakh

Amidst dark times for Indian journalism, a Colonel, Ajai Shukla, consulting editor on strategic affairs for Business Standard, has called out his government on its handling of the Chinese intrusion in Laddakh.

Moreover, the newspaper, Business Standard, has emerged as a welcome sight amid the current state of affairs in Indian media.

Ajai Shukla, amongst other favors to democracy in India, openly talks about the Chinese intrusion into Ladakh. He discussed the flaws in Prime Minister Narendra Modi\’s China policy as well as the government\’s spin to conceal its failure.

What does Shukla have to say about Laddakh?

Interestingly, Shukla was the only journalist who did not parrot government claims of China agreeing to disengage and withdraw troops from India\’s territory.

Mapping the Line of Actual Control he showed it had shifted westward into Indian territory. The figures quoted by Shukla are as follows: about 12-15 km in Depsang. 1 km at Patrolling Point-14 in the Galway Valley. 2-4 km at three other patrolling points; and by 8 km at the Pangong Tso Lake. He also said China was refusing to restore the status quo that existed before its troops walked into Ladakh. It is important to note that the numbers Shukla stated have not been officially denied.

Why is the truth about Laddakh important?

The truth about Laddakh, or as a matter of fact, for any other incidence is quintessential. Governments need to know they can no longer go on spinning a web of lies to do away with the need to explain to people their neglect of matters of public interest, specifically national security.

However, compelling proof and national interest are crucial as the story itself. It is high time the media, particularly media in the subcontinent begins to realize this and report responsibly.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

Pakistan-Only? The TTP’s Transnational Reality

Pakistan-Only? The TTP’s Transnational Reality

While the TTP publicly claims its insurgency targets only Pakistan, evidence reveals a transnational reality. Supported by Afghan fighters and resources, and shaped by the Afghan Taliban’s strategic interests, the TTP exemplifies cross-border proxy warfare. Understanding its structure, motivations, and operational networks challenges simplistic “Pakistan-only” narratives and underscores the enduring complexities of South Asian security.

Read More »
Pakistan’s Heritage and Rights Ethos: Unlocking Cultural Diplomacy

Pakistan’s Heritage and Rights Ethos: Unlocking Cultural Diplomacy

Pakistan’s diverse cultural heritage, from the hospitality of Pashtunwali and Sufi music in Sindh to folk traditions in Punjab, Balochistan, and Gilgit–Baltistan, reflects an enduring rights-based ethos. These living practices promote dignity, justice, and social inclusion. By integrating these traditions into cultural diplomacy, Pakistan can showcase its soft power while supporting custodians of heritage, artisans, and local communities.

Read More »
A deep dive into how the Afghan Taliban weaponises anti-Pakistan rhetoric to mask governance failures, rising poverty, and Afghanistan’s growing security meltdown.

The Politics of Blame

Afghanistan’s leadership has responded to recent international backlash by amplifying a narrative that frames Pakistan as the root of all Afghan crises. This rhetoric, pushed by senior Taliban officials, serves as a diversion from Kabul’s own administrative paralysis, economic collapse, and its complicity in enabling militant groups like the TTP. As poverty deepens and Afghanistan becomes a hub for dozens of terrorist outfits, the politics of blame has become the Taliban’s primary tool for deflecting scrutiny.

Read More »
Sanctuary and Sovereignty: The Tribal Ethics Behind the Pakistan–Taliban Rift

Sanctuary and Sovereignty: The Tribal Ethics Behind the Pakistan–Taliban Rift

The piece analyzes the Pakistan–Taliban rift through the lens of Pashtunwali, highlighting how Kabul’s sheltering of the TTP and its revival of Durand Line irredentism conflict with the tribal code’s principles of hospitality, sanctuary, and reciprocity. These choices undermine decades of Pakistani support and have transformed a historically interdependent relationship into one marked by distrust and hostility.

Read More »