Belt and Road Initiative (BRI): China-led regional group calls for countering protectionist policies, sanctions

China-led regional group urges action against protectionist policies and sanctions, emphasizing the importance of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

A China-led 10-state regional group criticized what it called protectionist trade measures on Wednesday. This criticism is part of an intensifying standoff between Beijing and Western countries over tariffs on Chinese products. Member states emphasize the importance of initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) to foster regional cooperation.

The Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) is a Eurasian security and political group. It also criticized “unilateral sanctions.” Member states Iran and Russia face curbs on trade.

The criticism came in a joint statement, following a heads of government meeting of the SCO in Islamabad, signed by 10 countries, including China, Russia, Iran, India and host Pakistan.

The statement said that the 10 member states, represented by seven prime ministers, “consider it important to continue joint efforts to counter protectionist trade measures that are contrary to WTO rules”.

The United States and Canada have increased tariffs on Chinese products such as electric vehicles, aluminium and steel, and the European Union is set to follow suit. Beijing has termed the moves discriminatory, and responded with similar actions as the standoff intensifies.

The SCO also said that “unilateral application of sanctions” is against international law and has an impact on third countries.

Russia and Iran, both members of the SCO, face sanctions from the West. Both possess some of the world’s largest energy resources.

Sanctions have caused smaller countries to shy away from trade with Iran and Russia. Meanwhile, larger, more influential economies, such as China and India, continue to purchase energy from them.

Energy-starved Pakistan does not import gas or fuel from neighbouring Iran despite its cost-effectiveness, and a gas pipeline between the two has stalled due to Islamabad fearing U.S. sanctions.

Also See: Pakistan and China: A Tango of Trust and Diplomatic Choreography

‘EXPAND BRI’

Earlier at the meeting, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif called for the expansion of China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI).

In his speech as the chair of the meeting, Sharif said, “We should expand flagship projects like President Xi Jinping’s Belt and Road Initiative, focusing on developing road, rail, and digital infrastructure that enhances integration and cooperation across our region.”

The BRI is a $1 trillion plan for global infrastructure and energy networks that China launched a decade ago to connect Asia with Africa and Europe through land and maritime routes.

More than 150 countries, including Russia, have signed up to participate in it.

Beijing’s rivals see the BRI as a tool for China to spread its geopolitical and economic influence.

Western countries, under the G7 platform, last year announced a $600 billion rival connectivity infrastructure development plan.

The China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC) is a part of the BRI and has seen Beijing pump in billions of dollars into the South Asian country for road networks, a strategic port and an airport.

This news is sourced from Reuters and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »