Bangladesh “enmity to none” policy helps improve ties with Pakistan

After years of strained ties between Pakistan and Bangladesh, recent contacts between leaders of the two countries are a rare glimpse of hope. Possibly, if not yet probably, Islamabad and Dhaka might break the ice between them.

Since 1971, the two have seen many ups and downs between relations. Jamaat-e-Islami and main opposition Bangladesh Nationalist Party leaders contributed to it in the recent past. On accusations of committing atrocities during the 1971 War of Independence, the International Crimes Tribunal was called upon.

Bangladesh’s new foreign policy

\”Our foreign policy is friendship to all and malice to none,” Bangladeshi Foreign Minister AK Abdul Momen told Anadolu Agency.

There are no permanent friends or enemies when it comes to foreign policy said Momen. He added that no country, its people, or its media should do anything that may create an adverse impact over the bilateral ties between two states. With Dhaka pursuing a foreign policy as such, bilateral ties could continue to improve.

There was a courtesy meeting between Momen and Pakistani High Commissioner in Dhaka, Imran Ahmed Siddiqui, earlier this month. Pakistani Prime Minister Imran Khan made a telephone call to his Bangladeshi counterpart, Sheikh Hasina.

Pakistan’s take on matters

Pakistan\’s foreign ministry spokeswoman, Aisha Farooqui, said her country \”has a keen desire to see bilateral relations and peoples’ relations with Bangladesh improve and strengthen.\”

\”We have a very strong historical connection and we want to have cooperative relations between us,\” Farooqui told Anadolu Agency

\”As founding members of SAARC [South Asian Association of Regional Cooperation] and for the mutual objective of forwarding movement towards economic prosperity and fulfillment of development goals of the people of South Asia we believe both Pakistan and Bangladesh can play an important role to strengthen SAARC processes for regional cooperation,\” she maintained.

Bad patch in India-Bangladesh ties

India helped the Bangladeshi militarily in the 1971 war, which resulted in a strong bond between Dhaka and New Delhi.  However, increasing deaths of Bangladeshi nationals at the hands of Indian border forces, diversion of water on common rivers, and the Citizenship Amendment Act and the NRC have all contributed to sour ties.

Bangladesh\’s growing relations with India\’s arch-rival, China is also a concern for Delhi. Bangladesh says it’s personal affairs, and foreign policy is none of anyone else’s business. The intolerance and the harsh reaction by Indian media are being frowned at.

Cautious optimism

Terming recent moves \”encouraging,\” analysts, however, see the developments with cautious optimism.

Imran Khan\’s initiative to make a phone call to Bangladesh\’s Prime Minister is a step in the right direction in mending fences with Dhaka.

He mentioned that insurmountable obstacles lay ahead. The issue of the apology casts a dark shadow on the relationship between Islamabad and Dhaka. It is too early to celebrate developments yet. Nevertheless, the happenings are a welcome sight.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »