7th April 2012 – 129 Soldiers Martyred in Gayari Sector Avalanche

Image Credits: Al Jazeera

In 2012, 135 people, including soldiers from Pakistan Army’s Northern Light Infantry (NLI) and civilians, were martyred in Gayari Sector Avalanche. The incident occurred at an altitude of about 4,000 meters and 300 km northeast of Skardu (capital of Gilgit-Baltistan). It was by far the worst avalanche to take place in the region.

The incident occurred on 7th April 2012. However, a month later, on 29th May the death of 129 soldiers and 11 civilians was announced. The Incident took place on the world’s highest battleground of Siachen. This region has been a battleground since 1984 when India moved in its forces. A ceasefire agreement took place between Pakistan and India in 2003.

Reportedly, the time of Avalanche was 02:00 hours on 7th April. The Avalanche broke off at 4560 meters above sea level and 1300 meters away from the camp. After the avalanche hit the base camp, all communication discontinued. It was later reported that the commander and colonel were present in the camp at the time of the incident.

Climate: An enemy at the highest Battlefield:

The rescue operation in Gayari sector began on 9th April as it could not take place on 7th-8th April due to harsh weather. A total of 452 people, 69 civilians, and 383 soldiers, alongside 8 experts from the United States were making efforts of removing the glacier. The operation was led by Chief of Army Staff, General Kayani.

Several experts blamed the harsh weather for the avalanche incident. Others blamed heavy Indian military activity in Siachen for melting ice, thus, causing an avalanche. A conspiracy theory blamed the Indian KALI (Kilo Ampere Linear Injector) project for melting ice near the camp.

The incident caused a wave of shock and mourning through the Pakistani public. Moreover, it brought global attention and political support from the Indian Prime Minister who offered President Zardari assistance in the rescue operation. It also got the US sending 8 experts from the Kabul base. The government of Pakistan and the Pakistan Army declared all soldiers martyred.

Abdullah Kayani

Muhammad Abdullah Kayani is a budding scholar with a keen interest in current affairs and news reporting. With a passion for uncovering and analyzing events shaping our world, he aims to inform and engage audiences through insightful commentary and diligent reporting.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »