April 21st in History the First Battle of Panipat (1526)

Image Credits: HistoryMaps

The First Battle of Panipat took place on April 21, 1526, between the forces of Zahiruddin Mohammad Babur and the Afghan King Ibrahim Lodi. It happened in northern India. That marked the beginning of the rule of the Mughal Empire and the fall of the Delhi Sultanate. In the Indian Subcontinent, it was one of the first battles to use gunpowder cannon and field artillery. The Mughals had adopted this method.

History

The Lodi dynasty had ruled Delhi since 1206. Babur, after failing to conquer Samarkand, moved to Chenab in 1519. He initially planned to keep Punjab but then in 1524, he decided to take on the Lodi dynasty. Lodi dynasty was trembling by then. Babur moved further up north of India and conquered Lahore. The northern region at the time was under Lodhi. After a failed attempt by the Afghan King Ibrahim Lodi’s uncle to capture Delhi, Babur took the position in Panipat.

The Battle

Babur defended his right flank towards the city of Panipat, thus digging a trench covered in tree branches to protect his left flanks, after learning of the strength and numbers of Ibrahim’s army. He arranged 700 carts in the middle and tied them together with ropes. There were breastworks for his matchlock men between every two carts. Babur also made sure that his soldiers had enough room to rest and fire their weapons. Due to the Ottomans’ prior use of this tool during the Battle of Chaldiran, Babur referred to it as the “Ottoman device.”

Ibrahim’s army arrived and discovered that the road to Babur’s army was too small to assault. While Ibrahim repositioned his troops to accommodate the narrower front, Babur seized the opportunity to flank (Tulghuma) the Lodi army. As the fighting turned against them, many of Ibrahim’s forces were unable to get into action and fled. Ibrahim Lodi was beheaded after being killed while attempting to flee. The war claimed the lives of 20,000 Lodi troops.

Babur’s War Strategy

Babur’s weapons were decisive in combat. Particularly because Ibrahim’s army lacked field artillery. Moreover, the sound of the cannon scared Ibrahim’s elephants, which forced them to tramp his own soldiers.

Babur’s war tactics included the Tulguhma and Araba. Tulguhma referred to the division of the whole army into three units: The Left, the Right, and the Middle. Additionally, the units divided further into subdivisions, in terms of right and left. Therefore, this allowed the army to surround the enemy from all sides.

According to history, Ibrahim Lodi died on the Battlefield.  Alongside him, 20,000 of his men died as well. The battle of Panipat was a decisive military success for the Timurids. In terms of politics, it gave Babur new lands and kicked off a new era in the long-running Mughal Empire in the heart of the Indian Subcontinent.

Abdullah Kayani

Muhammad Abdullah Kayani is a budding scholar with a keen interest in current affairs and news reporting. With a passion for uncovering and analyzing events shaping our world, he aims to inform and engage audiences through insightful commentary and diligent reporting.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »