APHC Accuses BJP of Exploiting Kashmir, Calls for Intervention

APHC condemns BJP for exploiting resources of Kashmir and calls for international intervention in the dispute [Image via Radio Pakistan/File]

All Parties Hurriyat Conference (APHC) has said that the BJP-led Indian government has deprived people of Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir of all their resources.

In a statement, the APHC leaders during a meeting in Srinagar, stressed that the Kashmir dispute is not a battle for power but a struggle for freedom from India’s illegal occupation.

APHC leaders reiterated that the proxy rule imposed by New Delhi, through Hindutva-driven BJP is systematically plundering the resources of Kashmir.

They strongly condemned confiscation of properties belonging to freedom-loving leaders and activists by Indian forces.

They said that Kashmiri people remain resolute in their struggle for their inalienable right to self-determination.

The Kashmiri leaders further said that the presence of over nine hundred thousand Indian occupation forces has made Kashmir most heavily militarized zone in world.

The APHC leaders urged world powers to intervene for the sake of international peace and security to resolve the Kashmir dispute as per the UN resolution.

They also demanded the immediate release of all illegally detained Hurriyat leaders and activists.

Also See: Kashmir Assembly Demands Restoration of Special Status

This news is sourced from Radio Pakistan and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

What is the Durand Line?

What is Durand Line?

The Durand Line, a 2,670-kilometer border drawn in 1893 between Afghanistan and British India, remains one of South Asia’s many contentious frontiers. Rejected by every Afghan government but recognized internationally, it symbolizes the region’s colonial legacy and ongoing power struggles. This backgrounder explores its origins in the Great Game, the legal and political controversies surrounding it, and its lasting impact on Pakistan-Afghanistan relations and regional security.

Read More »
Can war against terror be won without political consensus?

Can war against terror be won without political consensus?

For over two decades, Pakistan has battled the scourge of terrorism. Yet, despite military successes, the absence of political consensus continues to jeopardize lasting peace. As divisions deepen and populist narratives gain ground, the question remains: can Pakistan truly defeat terror without unity at the top?

Read More »
Shifting Sands: How Multipolar Pragmatism Is Redefining Global Alliances

Shifting Sands: How Multipolar Pragmatism Is Redefining Global Alliances

The world is entering an era of multipolar pragmatism where ideology no longer defines alliances. From NATO’s internal divides to BRICS expansion and regional realignments, states now pursue transactional partnerships driven by national interests. This fluid diplomacy creates both opportunities for middle powers and uncertainty in global governance.

Read More »
Afghan Taliban and Cross Border Terrorism in Pakistan

Afghan Taliban and Cross Border Terrorism in Pakistan

Pakistan is witnessing a sharp rise in terrorist attacks linked to the Afghan Taliban’s support for the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). A new study reveals that Afghan nationals now dominate TTP infiltration groups, exposing Kabul’s complicity in cross-border militancy. As violence escalates, Islamabad must balance border control, diplomacy, and de-radicalisation to counter

Read More »
The New Normal: End of Pakistan’s Strategic Restraint

The New Normal: End of Pakistan’s Strategic Restraint

Any hope surrounding the Pakistan–Afghanistan dialogue in Doha is colliding with renewed violence and mutual distrust. Pakistan’s recent precision strikes in Paktika, following a shattered ceasefire and terrorist attacks, signal a shift toward active defense. The talks now hinge on whether Kabul can curb militant sanctuaries and move beyond its victim narrative.

Read More »