Afghanistan Condemns Pakistan Airstrikes in Paktika

Afghanistan condemns Pakistan airstrikes in Paktika, claiming death of civilians and escalating tensions between the two countries [Image via AFP/File]

ISLAMABAD: The Afghan Foreign Ministry summoned Pakistan’s charge d’affaires in Kabul on Wednesday. They called him to record a formal protest over the airstrikes inside Paktika province of Afghanistan. The reported airstrikes targeted the hideouts of the banned Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP).

There was no official word yet from Pakistan regarding the airstrikes that according to the Afghan side targeted four locations in Bermal district of Paktika province. Some sources claimed that at the time of the air strikes, the TTP was holding a big gathering in Bermal.

The Pakistan side kept mum on the bombing allegations. However, sources claimed that three key targets of the airstrikes were Munib Jatt, head of the TTP media cell, Umar Media, his deputy Abu Hamza, and Akhtar Muhammad Khalil. Khalil is a commander of his own faction.

The strikes seemed to be in response to a recent surge in TTP-sponsored terrorist attacks in Pakistan. The latest attack in South Waziristan district of Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa, in which militants martyred 16 Pakistani soldiers, appeared to be the tipping point.

Previously, Pakistan carried out airstrikes inside Afghanistan in March this year, hitting the hideouts of the Hafiz Gul Bahadur group. At that time Pakistan, for the first time, publicly owned and acknowledged those strikes.

Also See: Legacy, Trade, and Turmoil: The Pak-Afghan Reset

Pakistan Envoy in Kabul

The latest claims of Pakistan airstrikes in Paktika, came on the day when Pakistan’s special envoy Ambassador Muhammad Sadiq was in Kabul, holding talks with Taliban officials to break the ice. His visit was part of a renewed push to find a political solution to the security problems.

Despite the airstrikes, Sadiq’s engagements in Kabul went ahead as per schedule on Wednesday. Hours after the reported bombing, Sadiq held talks with Afghan Deputy Prime Minister for political Affairs Maulwi Abdul Kabir.

While he held talks with Afghan authorities to find a diplomatic solution to the TTP problem, the Afghan foreign ministry called Pakistani diplomat Hafiz Zia Ahmad and issued a strong demarche.

The deputy spokesperson for the Taliban government claimed that Pakistani strikes killed 46 people and injured six. The Afghan side insisted that those killed were from Waziristan. A spokesperson for the Afghan foreign ministry said that a letter of strong protest was delivered to the Pakistani diplomat.

Afghanistan, with its long history of defending itself against major powers, strongly rejected any violation of its territorial integrity and firmly committed to defending its sovereignty, according to a statement.

It added that Kabul had clearly informed the Pakistani side that protecting Afghanistan’s national sovereignty was a red line and that such actions were highly irresponsible and would inevitably have consequences.

Earlier, Mullah Hamdullah Fitrat, the deputy spokesperson for the interim Taliban administration, said that Pakistani jets bombed four locations in Paktika’s Barmal district in Tuesday night, killing 46 people, injuring six, and destroying houses, according to the state-run Bakhtar news agency.

Kabul stated that Pakistan carried out its second airstrike inside Afghanistan, following the first one in March, which the Taliban administration formally protested.

Strikes Targeting TTP Camps

Islamabad had yet to respond to the claims made by Kabul. However, media reports quoting unnamed Pakistani security officials said the fighter jets targeted camps of the banned militant group TTP.

The TTP has carried out deadly attacks on the Pakistani security forces, mainly in the border regions, in recent months. Islamabad has long accused Kabul of failing to crack down on the TTP, who have reportedly been operating from Afghanistan. Kabul denies the charge.

Following the airstrikes, the Afghan Ministry of National Defence said that the interim Taliban administration would not leave this act unanswered rather it considered the defence of its territory its inalienable right.

“Afghanistan considers this brutal act against all international principles and a blatant aggression and strongly condemns it. The Pakistani side should know that such arbitrary measures are not a solution to any problem” read the statement.

The ministry also substantiated the claims that Pakistani forces bombed Paktika province of Afghanistan, adding that the bombing targeted civilians from Waziristan.

This news is sourced from The Express Tribune and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »