Taliban deputy spokesman Hamdullah Fitrat’s recent assertion that Afghan soil will not be used for terrorist activities against Pakistan marks the latest in a series of declarations from Kabul aimed at assuaging Islamabad’s mounting security concerns. However, these statements are increasingly at odds with the grim realities on the ground, where the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) continues to orchestrate a bloody campaign against the Pakistani state from sanctuaries within Afghanistan.
Cross-Border Militancy and Eroding Trust
While Kabul publicly reiterates its commitment to regional stability, a significant disconnect between its official pronouncements and the actions of militant groups on its territory fuels a deep-seated trust deficit with Islamabad. For Pakistan, the crux of the issue lies in the persistent and verifiable presence of TTP safe havens in Afghan provinces such as Kunar, Nuristan, Paktika, and Khost. From these staging grounds, TTP leadership cadres are reportedly conducting digital operations, fundraising, and ideological training with impunity, planning and executing a surge of attacks in Pakistan, particularly in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, which has witnessed a dramatic spike in violence throughout 2025.
Recent major attacks, including a suicide attack on 28th June in North Waziristan in which 13 soldiers were martyred and another attack on 2nd July in Bajaur in which an Assistant commissioner along with four others was martyred, underscore the TTP’s enduring operational capacity, a capability that is sustained by the permissive environment and safe havens in Afghanistan. This on-ground reality starkly contrasts with statements from key Taliban figures, who have consistently, in various forums through late 2024 and into 2025, denied the TTP’s presence, often framing the issue as an internal Pakistani matter. This narrative from the Taliban leadership further exacerbates tensions, suggesting a lack of will, or perhaps capacity, to meaningfully address Pakistan’s core security concerns.
Terror Havens Threaten Economic Integration
The stakes in the Pak-Afghan relationship extend far beyond diplomatic rhetoric, anchoring the security and economic connectivity of the entire region. Ambitious infrastructure projects, long touted as game-changers for regional integration, hang in the balance. The Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline and the Central Asia-South Asia (CASA-1000) electricity transmission project are emblematic of this precarity. While progress on these projects continues in fits and starts, their ultimate viability is fundamentally dependent on stable border security and the neutralization of militant ecosystems. The persistent threat of terrorism casts a long shadow over the future of these multi-billion-dollar initiatives, transforming them from symbols of cooperation into potential casualties of mistrust.
Bilateral and transit trade, a lifeline for Afghanistan’s sanctions-battered economy, also feels the strain of the security impasse. While trade volumes saw an increase in early 2025, the relationship was frequently disrupted by border closures and heightened security measures in response to terrorist attacks. This instability hinders the potential for sustained economic growth and underscores Afghanistan’s economic dependence on its eastern neighbor. For commerce to flourish, a stable and secure environment is not a luxury but a prerequisite. Kabul’s perceived ambivalence on the issue of terror havens directly undermines the prospects for long-term economic partnership.
The Refugee Factor
Adding another layer of complexity to this fraught relationship is the issue of Afghan refugees in Pakistan. While Fitrat has acknowledged the refugee situation, the unspoken reality is the strategic leverage it affords Kabul. For decades, Pakistan has hosted millions of Afghans, a policy that has now become intertwined with the ongoing security dilemma. Many of these Afghan refugees are now found to be responsible for various terrorist attacks in Pakistan carried out by the TTP. Similarly, the TTP also has a high density of Afghan nationals from both sides in its ranks, making the situation more complex.
Ultimately, for Pakistan and Afghanistan to move towards a semblance of normalized relations, a fundamental shift from rhetoric to verifiable action is imperative. Goodwill, expressed through public statements, must translate into a tangible crackdown on cross-border militant activity. The international community, while engaged in humanitarian efforts, watches with apprehension as the security situation deteriorates. Without a concerted and sincere effort from Kabul to dismantle the terror infrastructure within its borders, the chasm of trust between the two nations will continue to widen, imperiling not just their bilateral future but the stability of a volatile and strategically vital region. The burden of proof, in the eyes of Islamabad and many international observers, now rests squarely on the shoulders of the Taliban.
A Region Held Hostage: The TTP’s Enduring Threat from Afghan Soil
Taliban deputy spokesman Hamdullah Fitrat’s recent assertion that Afghan soil will not be used for terrorist activities against Pakistan marks the latest in a series of declarations from Kabul aimed at assuaging Islamabad’s mounting security concerns. However, these statements are increasingly at odds with the grim realities on the ground, where the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) continues to orchestrate a bloody campaign against the Pakistani state from sanctuaries within Afghanistan.
Cross-Border Militancy and Eroding Trust
While Kabul publicly reiterates its commitment to regional stability, a significant disconnect between its official pronouncements and the actions of militant groups on its territory fuels a deep-seated trust deficit with Islamabad. For Pakistan, the crux of the issue lies in the persistent and verifiable presence of TTP safe havens in Afghan provinces such as Kunar, Nuristan, Paktika, and Khost. From these staging grounds, TTP leadership cadres are reportedly conducting digital operations, fundraising, and ideological training with impunity, planning and executing a surge of attacks in Pakistan, particularly in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, which has witnessed a dramatic spike in violence throughout 2025.
Recent major attacks, including a suicide attack on 28th June in North Waziristan in which 13 soldiers were martyred and another attack on 2nd July in Bajaur in which an Assistant commissioner along with four others was martyred, underscore the TTP’s enduring operational capacity, a capability that is sustained by the permissive environment and safe havens in Afghanistan. This on-ground reality starkly contrasts with statements from key Taliban figures, who have consistently, in various forums through late 2024 and into 2025, denied the TTP’s presence, often framing the issue as an internal Pakistani matter. This narrative from the Taliban leadership further exacerbates tensions, suggesting a lack of will, or perhaps capacity, to meaningfully address Pakistan’s core security concerns.
Terror Havens Threaten Economic Integration
The stakes in the Pak-Afghan relationship extend far beyond diplomatic rhetoric, anchoring the security and economic connectivity of the entire region. Ambitious infrastructure projects, long touted as game-changers for regional integration, hang in the balance. The Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline and the Central Asia-South Asia (CASA-1000) electricity transmission project are emblematic of this precarity. While progress on these projects continues in fits and starts, their ultimate viability is fundamentally dependent on stable border security and the neutralization of militant ecosystems. The persistent threat of terrorism casts a long shadow over the future of these multi-billion-dollar initiatives, transforming them from symbols of cooperation into potential casualties of mistrust.
Bilateral and transit trade, a lifeline for Afghanistan’s sanctions-battered economy, also feels the strain of the security impasse. While trade volumes saw an increase in early 2025, the relationship was frequently disrupted by border closures and heightened security measures in response to terrorist attacks. This instability hinders the potential for sustained economic growth and underscores Afghanistan’s economic dependence on its eastern neighbor. For commerce to flourish, a stable and secure environment is not a luxury but a prerequisite. Kabul’s perceived ambivalence on the issue of terror havens directly undermines the prospects for long-term economic partnership.
The Refugee Factor
Adding another layer of complexity to this fraught relationship is the issue of Afghan refugees in Pakistan. While Fitrat has acknowledged the refugee situation, the unspoken reality is the strategic leverage it affords Kabul. For decades, Pakistan has hosted millions of Afghans, a policy that has now become intertwined with the ongoing security dilemma. Many of these Afghan refugees are now found to be responsible for various terrorist attacks in Pakistan carried out by the TTP. Similarly, the TTP also has a high density of Afghan nationals from both sides in its ranks, making the situation more complex.
Ultimately, for Pakistan and Afghanistan to move towards a semblance of normalized relations, a fundamental shift from rhetoric to verifiable action is imperative. Goodwill, expressed through public statements, must translate into a tangible crackdown on cross-border militant activity. The international community, while engaged in humanitarian efforts, watches with apprehension as the security situation deteriorates. Without a concerted and sincere effort from Kabul to dismantle the terror infrastructure within its borders, the chasm of trust between the two nations will continue to widen, imperiling not just their bilateral future but the stability of a volatile and strategically vital region. The burden of proof, in the eyes of Islamabad and many international observers, now rests squarely on the shoulders of the Taliban.
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.
Recent
The Taliban’s Broken Promises: Time for a New U.S. Strategy in Afghanistan
Since the Taliban’s return to power, Afghanistan has once again become a hub for militant activity despite their promises under the 2020 Doha Accord. UN and SIGAR reports reveal that Afghan soil now shelters TTP, Al-Qaeda, and ISIS-K operatives involved in cross-border attacks, particularly against Pakistan. The Taliban’s failure to uphold intra-Afghan dialogue, misuse of international aid, human rights abuses, and deception in regional agreements have eroded trust globally. With terror networks thriving under their protection, it is time for the U.S. and international community to adopt a new, accountable strategy toward Afghanistan’s Taliban regime.
Instability as Strategy: How India Benefits from the Afghan-Pakistan Breakdown
The escalating tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan’s Taliban-led regime have reignited South Asia’s most volatile frontier. As cross-border attacks intensify and the Taliban refuses to dismantle the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Islamabad faces mounting security and sovereignty challenges. Yet, amid this chaos, India emerges as the silent beneficiary, leveraging regional instability to weaken Pakistan strategically while maintaining its image as a victim of terrorism. This calculated exploitation threatens to entrench South Asia in a new cycle of proxy conflict.
Broken Promises, Renewed Threats: Time to Hold TTA Accountable
Five years after the Doha Accord, the Taliban have broken key commitments: 5,000 released prisoners returned to combat, 89% of government posts are held by Pashtuns, and women remain barred from education and work. Afghan soil hosts 6,000–6,500 TTP and Al-Qaeda fighters, with TTP chief Noor Wali Mehsud receiving $43,000/month. Pakistan has neutralized 267 Afghan terrorists in 2025, while 58 terrorist camps operate under Taliban knowledge. Despite the US aid, compliance is minimal. International recognition and support must now be tied to verifiable reforms to prevent further regional instability.
The Istanbul Dialogue: How the Taliban’s Intransigence Doomed Diplomacy
The highly anticipated Istanbul dialogue, facilitated by Turkey and Qatar, has ended in deadlock. The Taliban’s refusal to act against the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and their introduction of provocative counter-demands have effectively derailed the diplomatic process, underscoring the ideological rigidity driving Kabul’s foreign policy.
Centralized Power and the Core–Periphery Divide in Afghanistan
The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan’s return in 2021 brought rapid consolidation of power, but also the revival of a historical flaw. By concentrating authority in the hands of southern Pashtun elites, the Taliban have recreated the core–periphery divide that has destabilized every Afghan regime since the 19th century. This hyper-centralization, rooted in ethnic exclusivity and Kandahar dominance, risks a repeat of past collapses as non-Pashtun regions turn toward functional autonomy.