Taliban deputy spokesman Hamdullah Fitrat’s recent assertion that Afghan soil will not be used for terrorist activities against Pakistan marks the latest in a series of declarations from Kabul aimed at assuaging Islamabad’s mounting security concerns. However, these statements are increasingly at odds with the grim realities on the ground, where the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) continues to orchestrate a bloody campaign against the Pakistani state from sanctuaries within Afghanistan.
Cross-Border Militancy and Eroding Trust
While Kabul publicly reiterates its commitment to regional stability, a significant disconnect between its official pronouncements and the actions of militant groups on its territory fuels a deep-seated trust deficit with Islamabad. For Pakistan, the crux of the issue lies in the persistent and verifiable presence of TTP safe havens in Afghan provinces such as Kunar, Nuristan, Paktika, and Khost. From these staging grounds, TTP leadership cadres are reportedly conducting digital operations, fundraising, and ideological training with impunity, planning and executing a surge of attacks in Pakistan, particularly in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, which has witnessed a dramatic spike in violence throughout 2025.
Recent major attacks, including a suicide attack on 28th June in North Waziristan in which 13 soldiers were martyred and another attack on 2nd July in Bajaur in which an Assistant commissioner along with four others was martyred, underscore the TTP’s enduring operational capacity, a capability that is sustained by the permissive environment and safe havens in Afghanistan. This on-ground reality starkly contrasts with statements from key Taliban figures, who have consistently, in various forums through late 2024 and into 2025, denied the TTP’s presence, often framing the issue as an internal Pakistani matter. This narrative from the Taliban leadership further exacerbates tensions, suggesting a lack of will, or perhaps capacity, to meaningfully address Pakistan’s core security concerns.
Terror Havens Threaten Economic Integration
The stakes in the Pak-Afghan relationship extend far beyond diplomatic rhetoric, anchoring the security and economic connectivity of the entire region. Ambitious infrastructure projects, long touted as game-changers for regional integration, hang in the balance. The Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline and the Central Asia-South Asia (CASA-1000) electricity transmission project are emblematic of this precarity. While progress on these projects continues in fits and starts, their ultimate viability is fundamentally dependent on stable border security and the neutralization of militant ecosystems. The persistent threat of terrorism casts a long shadow over the future of these multi-billion-dollar initiatives, transforming them from symbols of cooperation into potential casualties of mistrust.
Bilateral and transit trade, a lifeline for Afghanistan’s sanctions-battered economy, also feels the strain of the security impasse. While trade volumes saw an increase in early 2025, the relationship was frequently disrupted by border closures and heightened security measures in response to terrorist attacks. This instability hinders the potential for sustained economic growth and underscores Afghanistan’s economic dependence on its eastern neighbor. For commerce to flourish, a stable and secure environment is not a luxury but a prerequisite. Kabul’s perceived ambivalence on the issue of terror havens directly undermines the prospects for long-term economic partnership.
The Refugee Factor
Adding another layer of complexity to this fraught relationship is the issue of Afghan refugees in Pakistan. While Fitrat has acknowledged the refugee situation, the unspoken reality is the strategic leverage it affords Kabul. For decades, Pakistan has hosted millions of Afghans, a policy that has now become intertwined with the ongoing security dilemma. Many of these Afghan refugees are now found to be responsible for various terrorist attacks in Pakistan carried out by the TTP. Similarly, the TTP also has a high density of Afghan nationals from both sides in its ranks, making the situation more complex.
Ultimately, for Pakistan and Afghanistan to move towards a semblance of normalized relations, a fundamental shift from rhetoric to verifiable action is imperative. Goodwill, expressed through public statements, must translate into a tangible crackdown on cross-border militant activity. The international community, while engaged in humanitarian efforts, watches with apprehension as the security situation deteriorates. Without a concerted and sincere effort from Kabul to dismantle the terror infrastructure within its borders, the chasm of trust between the two nations will continue to widen, imperiling not just their bilateral future but the stability of a volatile and strategically vital region. The burden of proof, in the eyes of Islamabad and many international observers, now rests squarely on the shoulders of the Taliban.
A Region Held Hostage: The TTP’s Enduring Threat from Afghan Soil
Taliban deputy spokesman Hamdullah Fitrat’s recent assertion that Afghan soil will not be used for terrorist activities against Pakistan marks the latest in a series of declarations from Kabul aimed at assuaging Islamabad’s mounting security concerns. However, these statements are increasingly at odds with the grim realities on the ground, where the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) continues to orchestrate a bloody campaign against the Pakistani state from sanctuaries within Afghanistan.
Cross-Border Militancy and Eroding Trust
While Kabul publicly reiterates its commitment to regional stability, a significant disconnect between its official pronouncements and the actions of militant groups on its territory fuels a deep-seated trust deficit with Islamabad. For Pakistan, the crux of the issue lies in the persistent and verifiable presence of TTP safe havens in Afghan provinces such as Kunar, Nuristan, Paktika, and Khost. From these staging grounds, TTP leadership cadres are reportedly conducting digital operations, fundraising, and ideological training with impunity, planning and executing a surge of attacks in Pakistan, particularly in the Khyber Pakhtunkhwa province, which has witnessed a dramatic spike in violence throughout 2025.
Recent major attacks, including a suicide attack on 28th June in North Waziristan in which 13 soldiers were martyred and another attack on 2nd July in Bajaur in which an Assistant commissioner along with four others was martyred, underscore the TTP’s enduring operational capacity, a capability that is sustained by the permissive environment and safe havens in Afghanistan. This on-ground reality starkly contrasts with statements from key Taliban figures, who have consistently, in various forums through late 2024 and into 2025, denied the TTP’s presence, often framing the issue as an internal Pakistani matter. This narrative from the Taliban leadership further exacerbates tensions, suggesting a lack of will, or perhaps capacity, to meaningfully address Pakistan’s core security concerns.
Terror Havens Threaten Economic Integration
The stakes in the Pak-Afghan relationship extend far beyond diplomatic rhetoric, anchoring the security and economic connectivity of the entire region. Ambitious infrastructure projects, long touted as game-changers for regional integration, hang in the balance. The Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-India (TAPI) gas pipeline and the Central Asia-South Asia (CASA-1000) electricity transmission project are emblematic of this precarity. While progress on these projects continues in fits and starts, their ultimate viability is fundamentally dependent on stable border security and the neutralization of militant ecosystems. The persistent threat of terrorism casts a long shadow over the future of these multi-billion-dollar initiatives, transforming them from symbols of cooperation into potential casualties of mistrust.
Bilateral and transit trade, a lifeline for Afghanistan’s sanctions-battered economy, also feels the strain of the security impasse. While trade volumes saw an increase in early 2025, the relationship was frequently disrupted by border closures and heightened security measures in response to terrorist attacks. This instability hinders the potential for sustained economic growth and underscores Afghanistan’s economic dependence on its eastern neighbor. For commerce to flourish, a stable and secure environment is not a luxury but a prerequisite. Kabul’s perceived ambivalence on the issue of terror havens directly undermines the prospects for long-term economic partnership.
The Refugee Factor
Adding another layer of complexity to this fraught relationship is the issue of Afghan refugees in Pakistan. While Fitrat has acknowledged the refugee situation, the unspoken reality is the strategic leverage it affords Kabul. For decades, Pakistan has hosted millions of Afghans, a policy that has now become intertwined with the ongoing security dilemma. Many of these Afghan refugees are now found to be responsible for various terrorist attacks in Pakistan carried out by the TTP. Similarly, the TTP also has a high density of Afghan nationals from both sides in its ranks, making the situation more complex.
Ultimately, for Pakistan and Afghanistan to move towards a semblance of normalized relations, a fundamental shift from rhetoric to verifiable action is imperative. Goodwill, expressed through public statements, must translate into a tangible crackdown on cross-border militant activity. The international community, while engaged in humanitarian efforts, watches with apprehension as the security situation deteriorates. Without a concerted and sincere effort from Kabul to dismantle the terror infrastructure within its borders, the chasm of trust between the two nations will continue to widen, imperiling not just their bilateral future but the stability of a volatile and strategically vital region. The burden of proof, in the eyes of Islamabad and many international observers, now rests squarely on the shoulders of the Taliban.
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentary
SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.
Recent
After Sheikh Hasina’s Exit, Can India Rebuild Its Strategic Ties with Bangladesh by Pushing Dhaka Towards the Quad?
Sheikh Hasina’s resignation ended India’s golden era of ties with Bangladesh, leaving New Delhi scrambling to counter China’s growing influence. Can Quad engagement offer India a path to rebuild trust and secure the Bay of Bengal?
Between Security and Privacy: Contextualizing Amnesty’s Claims on Pakistan’s Surveillance
Amnesty International’s Shadows of Control paints a bleak picture of Pakistan’s digital surveillance. Yet by sidelining the country’s acute security challenges, dismissing existing legal safeguards, and overlooking its own credibility issues, the report offers a partial and misleading narrative. A more balanced approach requires situating surveillance within Pakistan’s counterterrorism imperatives and recognizing the global double standards at play.
The End of Liberal Internationalism? Trump’s New Realism
Donald Trump’s address to the UN General Assembly marked a sharp break from America’s seven-decade stewardship of the liberal international order. Rooted in realist principles, his speech rejected multilateralism, attacked the UN’s legitimacy, and reframed alliances as transactional bargains. From immigration and climate policy to NATO and Middle East conflicts, Trump outlined a vision of unilateral power and national sovereignty that directly challenges the institutional foundations of global governance.
Colonial Legacies of Bombay and Calcutta
Bombay and Calcutta were more than colonial capitals, they embodied imperial urban planning, economic integration, and cultural hybridity. From segregated ‘white’ and ‘black’ towns to thriving ports, industries, and nationalist thought, these cities reveal how British rule reshaped India’s urban life while leaving enduring legacies still visible today.
The Many Faces of Activism: Symbolism, Lawfare, and Separatist Politics
Mahrang Baloch is hailed as a human rights defender, yet her rhetoric, symbolism, and political positioning reveal alignment with separatist objectives. Her activism reflects the dynamics of narrative warfare, where political fronts provide legitimacy to armed insurgencies.