A New Era in Pakistan–Syria Relations After Assad

A New Era in Pakistan–Syria Relations After Assad

But this is certainly not the full extent of Pakistan’s diplomatic ties with the Syrian Republic. Throughout the decades long Arab-Israeli tensions, Pakistan remained a vocal opponent of the Israeli regime and consistently advocated for the establishment of an independent Palestinian state, a diplomatic stance that brought the regimes in Islamabad and Damascus closer together. During the Yom Kippur War, Pakistan’s Prime Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto sought to strengthen ties with the Arab world by sending Pakistani volunteers to support Egypt and Syria.

Even after the revolution, when the Assad regime was diplomatically isolated in the Islamic world, as Türkiye, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar took an aggressive anti-Assad stance, Pakistan kept several diplomatic channels open with Damascus, never openly supporting the revolution or showing any clear partisanship.

Syrian President Bashar Assad (right) welcomes his then-Pakistani counterpart, Asif Ali Zardari, at the presidential palace in Damascus in 2010. (AP)

In July 2021, Syrian Education Minister Darem Tabbaa signed a protocol allowing Syrian students at the Pakistan International School in Damascus to obtain qualifications from the University of Cambridge. The signing ceremony, jointly organized with the Pakistani embassy, was personally overseen by Syrian Foreign Minister Faisal Mekdad, who stated:

“We are also working to deepen bilateral relations between the two countries through other steps in the scientific and cultural fields.”

Syrian President Bashar al-Assad kisses a schoolgirl at the Pakistan International School in Damascus as Pakistani military ruler Pervez Musharraf looks on, in 2001. (AFP)

Following this, the two nations agreed to exchange information and expertise in designated areas of cooperation, paving the way for reciprocal visits by performers, artists, writers, and teachers to participate in conferences, symposia, and seminars. Diplomatic engagement quickly expanded, with regular ministerial visits and delegations focusing primarily on education but also extending into defence and economic collaboration. Pakistan has supported Syria’s sugar, cement, fertiliser, and paper production sectors.

Diplomatic Engagement After the Ouster of Assad

Following the December 2024 ouster of Bashar al-Assad, Pakistan adopted a cautious yet supportive stance toward Syria’s new leadership. Islamabad emphasized that Syria’s future should be determined by Syrians themselves, through an inclusive political process free from foreign interference, while reaffirming its commitment to Syria’s sovereignty, unity, and territorial integrity.

Economically, talks have focused on boosting trade, investment, and technical assistance, particularly in agriculture, industry, and education. While no new flights or major trade volumes have been announced, both governments view economic revival as a key area of collaboration. Security cooperation remains limited. Pakistan continues to oppose the presence of foreign fighters in Syria. There have been no new defence deals, with security engagement largely confined to counterterrorism under multilateral frameworks.

Cultural and educational links remain strong. Pakistan’s embassy in Damascus actively promotes people-to-people ties, hosts national celebrations, and offers scholarships for Syrian students. The Pakistan International School in Damascus continues to operate, and further cultural exchanges are planned.

Pathways for Strategic, Economic, and Cultural Cooperation

The ouster of Bashar al-Assad and the success of the Syrian Revolution have presented Islamabad with a pivotal opportunity to recalibrate its diplomacy toward Syria. This shift is particularly timely given that Pakistan’s key regional allies, Türkiye, Saudi Arabia, and Qatar, are now fully invested in supporting the new regime in Damascus. Such alignment could open fresh avenues for cooperation in security, the economy, and shared cultural initiatives, especially considering that Syrian territory has been a hub of Islamic civilization for the past 14 centuries.

Economically, Pakistan could expand its trade footprint in Syria by exporting textiles, pharmaceuticals, agricultural machinery, and IT services, while importing Syrian olive oil, citrus fruits, and phosphates. Joint ventures in cement, fertiliser, and food processing could further aid Syria’s post-war reconstruction and stimulate mutually beneficial economic growth. In addition, infrastructure development projects, such as rehabilitating industrial plants or assisting in energy sector upgrades, could provide long-term economic dividends for both nations.

On the military and security front, cooperation could focus on training Syrian officers at Pakistani military academies, sharing counterterrorism expertise, and supplying non-lethal defence equipment such as communications systems, protective gear, and medical support. Collaborative initiatives in de-mining operations, border security management, and intelligence-sharing under regional security frameworks could enhance stability without dragging Pakistan into Syria’s internal political disputes.

Culturally, Pakistan and Syria could expand academic exchanges, archaeological preservation projects, and joint Islamic heritage initiatives, deepening people-to-people connections and reinforcing historical bonds. Such multi-layered engagement would not only strengthen bilateral trust but also support Syria’s stability, create new markets for Pakistani industries, and allow Islamabad to play a constructive role in the region without overextending itself into local conflicts.

The views expressed in this article are the author’s own. They do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of the South Asia Times.

Mohammed Saad

Mohammed Saad

Mohammed Saad is an M.Phil student in Political Science at GCU Lahore. His interests lie in Muslim Revivalist Movements, Global 'Jehadi' organizations, Ethno-nationalist movements in Pakistan, and Political Philosophy. On X (formerly Twitter), he can be reached at @hafizsaadriaz.

Recent

Broken Promises: The Taliban’s Betrayal of Global Commitments

Broken Promises: The Taliban’s Betrayal of Global Commitments

Nearly three years after seizing power, the Taliban’s systematic violation of their international commitments under the 2020 Doha Accord has transformed Afghanistan into a sanctuary for terrorism, entrenched an autocratic regime, and institutionalized gender apartheid. Beyond moral failure, this deceit poses a grave threat to regional stability, international counterterrorism efforts, and the credibility of global diplomacy. Holding the regime accountable is now a strategic necessity, not a choice.

Read More »
Do You Remember 6/11/ 1947?: A Forgotten Jammu Genocide and the Continuing Erasure of Kashmiriyat

Do You Remember 6/11/ 1947?: A Forgotten Jammu Genocide and the Continuing Erasure of Kashmiriyat

On November 6, 1947, one of South Asia’s earliest genocides unfolded in Jammu, where hundreds of thousands of Muslims were massacred or forced to flee. Yet, unlike other global tragedies, this atrocity remains buried in silence. The Jammu Genocide not only reshaped the region’s demography but laid the foundation for India’s ongoing campaign of identity erasure in Kashmir. From demographic engineering to cultural censorship, the spirit of Kashmiriyat continues to face systematic annihilation.

Read More »
India’s Climate Policy after COP28: Net Zero 2070 — A Fair Promise or a Risky Postponement?

India’s Climate Policy after COP28: Net Zero 2070 — A Fair Promise or a Risky Postponement?

India’s Net Zero 2070 target reflects a delicate balance between development equity and climate urgency. While progress in renewables, green finance, and adaptation is visible, the absence of clear interim milestones risks turning ambition into delay. The real challenge lies in translating a distant horizon into measurable, near-term climate action before 2030.

Read More »
The Tehreek-e-Hijrat of 1920 and Its Parallels with Contemporary Refugee Politics

The Tehreek-e-Hijrat of 1920 and Its Parallels with Contemporary Refugee Politics

The Tehreek-e-Hijrat of 1920 saw thousands of Indian Muslims migrate to Afghanistan, only to be turned away when Kabul could no longer cope. A century later, Afghan officials criticise Pakistan’s refugee policies while ignoring their own historical refusal to host Muslim migrants. The parallel reveals not just irony, but the enduring challenge of compassion, capacity, and collective responsibility.

Read More »
Playing the Victim: How the Taliban Endorse and Amplify Online Propaganda Against Pakistan

Playing the Victim: How the Taliban Endorse and Amplify Online Propaganda Against Pakistan

Following the October 2025 border clashes, the Taliban have shifted their battlefield online, using propaganda, selective history, and digital disinformation to paint Pakistan as the aggressor. Through controlled media releases, colonial-era references, and victimhood narratives, Kabul seeks to manipulate regional perception and deflect blame for its own failures.

Read More »