A Framework for US-Pakistan Cooperation in Mineral Resource Development

US-Pakistan mineral cooperation could secure America’s critical minerals and unlock Pakistan’s $8 trillion resource potential.

For years, Pakistan’s vast mineral wealth has been a story of immense potential left dormant. With untapped reserves now estimated by government officials to be worth upwards of $8 trillion, the country holds a powerful key to its own economic future, yet this colossal fortune remains largely unexploited. This glaring disconnect between a nation’s resources and its economic reality presents a compelling case for a new kind of foreign partnership. As the United States, the world’s largest economy, seeks to de-risk its critical mineral supply chains, which are currently over-reliant on a few key nations, an opportunity arises for a strategic collaboration with Pakistan. A targeted US-Pakistan partnership to develop the country’s mineral sector is more than just an economic play. It is a strategic imperative that could simultaneously stabilize Pakistan’s economy and secure America’s supply of essential materials.

Pakistan’s Untapped Mineral Potential: A Quantitative Overview

The scale of Pakistan’s mineral potential is difficult to overstate. The country is home to vast deposits of globally significant resources, from the world’s second-largest salt mines to expansive coal, chromite, and rare earth element deposits. The crown jewel is arguably the Reko Diq copper-gold project in Balochistan, which is one of the world’s largest untapped reserves. Canada’s Barrick Gold Corporation, a major stakeholder, forecasts that the project will generate an estimated $74 billion in free cash flow over a 37-year mine life. Beyond Reko Diq, Pakistan possesses an estimated 185 billion tons of coal, with the Thar Desert alone holding 175.5 billion tons, making the country the sixth richest in the world in coal resources.

Despite this immense treasure trove, the mining sector’s contribution to Pakistan’s economy remains a fraction of its potential. In fiscal year 2024, while the combined manufacturing and mining sectors saw a notable growth of 4.9%, the mining sector’s individual contribution to the GDP has historically lingered at around 1-2%. The chasm between potential and reality is further highlighted by Pakistan’s trade balance in this sector. According to data in 2023, the country imported over $20 billion in mineral products while exporting only around $3.88 billion, underscoring its dependency and missed opportunity. This economic disconnect is a consequence of several factors, including a lack of modern technology, poor infrastructure, and an unstable and complex regulatory environment that has long deterred large-scale foreign direct investment.

The US’s Strategic Vulnerability: A Need for Diversification

For the United States, this dynamic presents a unique strategic opportunity. The global race for critical minerals, essential for advanced technologies, defense systems, and the clean energy transition, has exposed a significant weakness in America’s supply chains. The US is heavily reliant on foreign imports for many of these materials. According to the US Geological Survey, the US is 100% net import reliant for at least 11 mineral commodities, including graphite and manganese, and more than 50% import reliant for an additional 31. This reliance creates a profound strategic vulnerability.

The supply chains for many of these critical minerals are heavily concentrated in a small number of countries, with one country dominating both the extraction and, more importantly, the processing stages. For example, China controls approximately 70-80% of global rare earth element processing, giving it a powerful position to manipulate global markets. In 2024, 70% of US rare earth element imports originated from China. Similarly, for other minerals found in abundance in Pakistan, the US has high reliance on a few key nations. For chromite ore, which is essential for stainless steel, the US imports over 96% of its supply from South Africa and Turkey. While for copper, the country depends on imports from nations like Chile, Canada, and Mexico to meet its needs.

This concentrated supply chain leaves the US and its allies exposed to geopolitical disruptions and market manipulation. The recent imposition of export controls on materials like gallium and germanium by China serves as a stark reminder of this vulnerability. Diversifying these supply chains is not merely an economic preference, it is a national security imperative. Pakistan, with its vast and largely underexplored mineral reserves, offers a viable, alternative source for these critical minerals. By partnering with Pakistan, the US can directly address its supply chain risks, reduce its reliance on a single nation, and strengthen its economic and national security. This presents a unique opportunity for both nations to align their strategic interests.

A Roadmap for a Successful Partnership

However, a successful partnership requires navigating significant challenges. On the Pakistani side, these include bureaucratic inefficiencies, political instability, and the need for a transparent and predictable regulatory framework. Pakistan is already addressing these issues through its new mineral policies. On the US side, a sustainable approach must be adopted, one that learns from past foreign investment models that have often been perceived as purely extractive.

A successful US-Pakistan framework for mineral cooperation must be multi-pronged and rooted in a long-term vision. First, the US can provide critical investment and technology. With its expertise in modern mining practices, the US can help Pakistan transition from primitive, small-scale operations to large-scale, efficient, and environmentally responsible mining. This includes providing the capital and equipment necessary for deep-earth exploration and extraction.

Second, the partnership must focus on infrastructure development. Mineral-rich regions, particularly in Balochistan, often lack the basic infrastructure, roads, power, and logistical networks needed to support major mining operations. Joint ventures can be established to not only develop these resources but also to build the necessary infrastructure, linking remote areas to global supply chains and fostering broader regional development.

Third, a core component must be human capital development. To ensure the economic benefits of mining projects are shared broadly and equitably, a focus on local employment and skill transfer is paramount. This includes establishing vocational training centers and educational programs to equip the local workforce with the skills needed for the modern mining industry.

Finally, and perhaps most importantly, the partnership must prioritize security and stability through community engagement and joint counter-terrorism strategies. This front is already seeing progress with joint counter-terrorism meetings and the US’s declaring of the BLA a global terrorist group. The BLA is a terrorist group active in the most mineral-rich areas of Balochistan. Additionally, the US can assist Pakistan in developing a more nuanced security strategy that incorporates community engagement and economic empowerment, ensuring that local communities are genuine stakeholders in the projects on their land.

A Win-Win Situation

In conclusion, US-Pakistan mineral cooperation is a mutually beneficial endeavor that moves beyond a simple transactional relationship. For the US, this partnership offers a path to diversifying its mineral supply and enhancing its geopolitical standing in a crucial region. It is a chance to build a resilient and secure supply chain in an era of intense competition. For Pakistan, it represents a chance to turn its dormant mineral wealth into a tangible engine of national prosperity, creating jobs, attracting foreign direct investment, and building critical infrastructure. The time for rhetoric is over. It’s time for a concrete, transparent, and collaborative plan that turns Pakistan’s mineral potential from a theoretical figure into a cornerstone of a stronger bilateral relationship and a more secure global economy. This new frontier of cooperation has the potential to reshape the fortunes of both nations for decades to come.

SAT Editorial Desk

Your go-to editorial hub for policy perspectives and informed analysis on pressing regional and global issues.

Recent

Pakistan-Only? The TTP’s Transnational Reality

Pakistan-Only? The TTP’s Transnational Reality

While the TTP publicly claims its insurgency targets only Pakistan, evidence reveals a transnational reality. Supported by Afghan fighters and resources, and shaped by the Afghan Taliban’s strategic interests, the TTP exemplifies cross-border proxy warfare. Understanding its structure, motivations, and operational networks challenges simplistic “Pakistan-only” narratives and underscores the enduring complexities of South Asian security.

Read More »
Pakistan’s Heritage and Rights Ethos: Unlocking Cultural Diplomacy

Pakistan’s Heritage and Rights Ethos: Unlocking Cultural Diplomacy

Pakistan’s diverse cultural heritage, from the hospitality of Pashtunwali and Sufi music in Sindh to folk traditions in Punjab, Balochistan, and Gilgit–Baltistan, reflects an enduring rights-based ethos. These living practices promote dignity, justice, and social inclusion. By integrating these traditions into cultural diplomacy, Pakistan can showcase its soft power while supporting custodians of heritage, artisans, and local communities.

Read More »
A deep dive into how the Afghan Taliban weaponises anti-Pakistan rhetoric to mask governance failures, rising poverty, and Afghanistan’s growing security meltdown.

The Politics of Blame

Afghanistan’s leadership has responded to recent international backlash by amplifying a narrative that frames Pakistan as the root of all Afghan crises. This rhetoric, pushed by senior Taliban officials, serves as a diversion from Kabul’s own administrative paralysis, economic collapse, and its complicity in enabling militant groups like the TTP. As poverty deepens and Afghanistan becomes a hub for dozens of terrorist outfits, the politics of blame has become the Taliban’s primary tool for deflecting scrutiny.

Read More »
Sanctuary and Sovereignty: The Tribal Ethics Behind the Pakistan–Taliban Rift

Sanctuary and Sovereignty: The Tribal Ethics Behind the Pakistan–Taliban Rift

The piece analyzes the Pakistan–Taliban rift through the lens of Pashtunwali, highlighting how Kabul’s sheltering of the TTP and its revival of Durand Line irredentism conflict with the tribal code’s principles of hospitality, sanctuary, and reciprocity. These choices undermine decades of Pakistani support and have transformed a historically interdependent relationship into one marked by distrust and hostility.

Read More »