5th April 1956 – Bandaranaike: 4th Prime Minister of Ceylon

download

In 1956, Bandaranaike won Ceylon’s General Elections and went on to become its 4th Prime Minister. He ruled Ceylon from 1956 to 1959. In 1936, he served as Minister of Local administration in the Second Board of Ministers. In 1947, he served as a Minister in Federal Cabinet.

Bandaranaike was the founder of the Sri Lanka Freedom Party which was a nationalist left-wing party. He formed this party in 1951. To run for election in 1956, Bandaranaike mortgaged his house at Rosmead Place to the Bank of Ceylon for Rs 200,000.  He formed Mahajana Eksath Peramuna by assembling a group of small Marxist to contest the 1956 general elections. It was a four-party coalition with a no-contest pact with the Lanka Sama Samaja Party and the Communist Party of Sri Lanka.

Bandaranaike’s policy perspective

Moreover, Bandaranaike’s policies had a very Nationalistic perspective. He aimed at removing the marks the British had left resultantly allowing him to unite Ceylon. His policies include the removal of English as the national language and the elimination of the caste-based system.

During the year 1958, he abolished capital punishments. Although during the same year, he failed to address the 1958 riots, leading to the death of hundreds of Tamils, in Ceylon. This made him pass Tamil Laws so the effect of the ‘Sinhala Only Law’, which made Sinhalese the official language of Ceylon, must not be a tool to be used against minorities in Ceylon.

His foreign policy approach was planned to be neutral but he went on to expel RAF (Royal Air Force) Bases’ Personnel from the country and established relations with the United Soviet Socialist Republic and the People’s Republic of China. He pushed for socialist and non-western policies, which explains much about his foreign policy.

In terms of economic policies, Ceylon was already facing a crisis. Bandaranaike amended labour laws and increased wages. He established Employee Provident Funds and nationalized Ceylon’s bus services to form Ceylon Transport Board. Additionally, he also passed laws to protect peasant farmers.

In 1959, political turmoil started when two leftist ministers of Mahajana Eksath Peramuna (MEP; People’s United Front) resigned, albeit did not affect the MEP coalition. Things worsened when the Colombo Harbor trade union went on strike over the financial crisis. As a consequence to which Bandaranaike dismissed Inspector General Police Silva, who refused to take action.

Bandaranaike’s assassination

Tragically, on 26th September 1959, Talduwe Somarama assassinated Bandaranaike. Somarama was a Buddhist monk residing in Bandaranaike’s residency. He died even after six hours of surgery. Talduwe alongside two other conspirators were tried and were sentenced to death by hanging.

This brought an end to Bandaranaike’s four years of ruling to a tragic end. Bandaranaike is a well-known figure in Sri Lanka and despite controversies for initiating racial crisis, he has been honored. Subsequently, in 1970 Sri Lanka named its first international airport after him.

Abdullah Kayani

Muhammad Abdullah Kayani is a budding scholar with a keen interest in current affairs and news reporting. With a passion for uncovering and analyzing events shaping our world, he aims to inform and engage audiences through insightful commentary and diligent reporting.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »