Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan: No Trouble with Neighbors

Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan

Any conflict is least desirable as the Islamic Emirate is near to completing its two years in power in Afghanistan. Meanwhile, the world also sees the rationale behind engaging with the Interim Government of Afghanistan, more clearly. The desirability to remain at peace is, however, different from the capacity to be able to execute and negotiate peace. The question arises, can the Interim Government of Afghanistan do both? The recent stability-instability spectrum with the immediate neighbor country, Pakistan, has some valuable answers to offer.

Engaging with Pakistan: Balancing Diplomacy and Counterterrorism

It would not be wrong to say that soon after the IEA came to power, Pakistan was one of the few countries in the region that did not hesitate to forge ties, but also helped the country in a near-chaos situation.

This spirit of engagement, however, eroded when Pakistan came on the receiving end of terrorist attacks one after the other. When the banned militant group, Tehrik e Taliban Pakistan (TTP), started claiming attacks, Pakistan had to diplomatically press the IEA to act, because the latter hosts the commanders’ cadre of TTP inside Afghanistan. The air gradually turned tense until the tipping point; the Bajaur attack claimed 55 lives in KP Province of Pakistan, on the last day of July 2023.

Islamic Emirate: Diplomacy and Terrorism

Claimed by Islamic State Khorasan (ISK), this attack on a political rally of a major religiopolitical party of the country, Jamiat Ulema Islam (JUI-F), received condemnation from the IEA as well. But a history of cordial relations between this party and the Taliban, that now form Afghanistan’s Interim Government, demanded more than just condemnation. For IEA, this was the moment to act responsibly and reaffirm their commitment to not harming any country by letting any terrorist faction flourish inside Afghanistan.

Before the unfortunate Bajaur tragedy, Pakistan’s Special Representative on Afghanistan, Asif Durrani, traveled to Kabul and had detailed talks with the officials in Afghanistan. The issue of TTP remained a focal point of the talks. However, no announcement of any decisive outcome regarding TTP was made public. Still, the visit was significant because it indicated an open channel of diplomacy and dialogue between the two countries; an open channel many feared would close after Kabul-mediated peace talks between Pakistan and TTP ended without bearing any remarkable success, in the second half of 2022.

A Push for Counterterrorism: Balancing Priorities

Act against TTP has dominated Pakistan’s Afghan policy for some time now. The push came even stronger when, following the Bajaur misfortune, JUI-F made a public statement pressing Afghanistan for effective action against terrorists. TTP certainly did not like this and condemned the statement in one of their press releases. But a tone was already set, and so Acting Defense Minister of Afghanistan, Mullah Yaqoob, addressing commanders of the Eastern zone, conveyed Amir’s message.

The message from IEA was loud and clear; fighting in other lands is not Jihad but war unless decreed by the Amir.

Apparently addressed to the Afghan forces and commanders, the message seems to be intended for a bigger audience. It highlights the very intent of the IEA to remain at peace and focus inwards. The country needs attention; any conflict would be costlier to handle. This, coupled with an official statement of Deputy Prime Minister for Foreign Affairs, Abbas Stanakzai, where he hinted at some intelligence agencies playing spoiler to disrupt IEA’s relations with its neighbors, is telling. Afghanistan wishes to ground its relations with its neighbors in firm and consistent diplomacy.

Instead of getting into chaos with Pakistan over the contested TTP issue, the IEA is, and perhaps must be more focused on preserving a space for dialogue. If the dialogue is accompanied by meaningful action, then this will certainly be a big evolution from Taliban 1.0 to Taliban 2.0. The sentiment of keeping the dialogue space alive is also shared by Pakistan, as in a recent statement, the Chief of Armed Forces, Asim Munir, reassured that Pakistan will talk and engage with the IEA only; and not any terrorist organization. Just as much as it is a message to the TTP, it is equally a gesture at peace with neighboring Afghanistan and its Interim Government.

SAT Editorial Desk

Your go-to editorial hub for policy perspectives and informed analysis on pressing regional and global issues.

Recent

Pakistan’s shift from arms importer to defense exporter reveals how indigenous military industry has become central to sovereignty in a fragmented global order.

Pakistan’s Defense Industrial Breakout

As the liberal international order fragments, Pakistan has executed a decisive shift from defense dependency to indigenous production. Through exports, combat validation, and joint industrialization, Islamabad is redefining sovereignty as an industrial and diplomatic asset.

Read More »
A critical reassessment of Afghan repatriation from Pakistan, weighing human rights advocacy against state sovereignty, security, and legal realities.

Rethinking Afghan Repatriation from Pakistan

Amnesty International’s call to halt Afghan repatriation overlooks the limits of long-term hospitality. For Pakistan, the issue is less about abandoning rights than reasserting sovereign immigration control amid shifting realities in Afghanistan.

Read More »
Andy Halus’s interview signals a shift in US–Pakistan relations toward minerals, education, and soft power, marking a post-security partnership in 2026.

The New Architecture of US–Pakistan Relations

Andy Halus’s interview signals a strategic shift in US–Pakistan relations from security-centric ties to a multidimensional partnership centered on minerals, education, and soft power. Projects like Reko Diq now stand as the key test of this new architecture.

Read More »