Indo-European Trade Deal – An Attempt to Block China’s Rising Influence?

BTIA

In April, talks were held between India and the European Union to revive the discussion on trade deals. Since 2013, Many a trade deal between India and the EU have been put on hold. This was largely because both nations failed to agree on a mutual agreement. The two parties could not reach a consensus on the extent of tariff reductions, patent protection, data security, and the rights of Indian professionals to work in Europe.

Indo-European Deal

Regarding this matter, Modi had a telephonic meeting with UN chief executive Ursula von der Leyen in April. Subsequently, they have agreed to meet in Lisbon, Portugal for further discussions. German Chancellor Angela Markel and EU Council President Charles Michel will also join the meeting.

The revival of trade deal would help build a $9 6billion trading mechanism between India and the European Union, that will help flourish and make a comfortable environment for the investment and flow of goods. The European Parliament will approve the deal, after which it will be sent to New Delhi for approval.

According to analysts in 2020, the deal could potentially constitute a benefit of $10 billion. However, on the other hand, the UK is working on its autonomous foreign policy to independently deal with its former trading partners. Trading partners that were previously under the flag of the European Union.

Moreover, the interest of the EU enhancing its trade with India has some evident logic. India is one of the fastest-growing economies in the world. The European Union can increase its share in the total Indian trade to a benchmark of 15%.

However, several analysts believe that this trade deal will also be used for another purpose. Such as the US\’s attempt to counter China in the region. China is currently, heavily involved in a lot of international projects. These include China\’s mammoth project of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) in South Asia.

China’s Ambitions

According to the BRI map, China will be creating a Silk Road Economic Belt through Asia into eastern Europe and then connect to western Europe via the railroad that it will be constructing. Even though Europe will be benefiting from this, it equally threatens European Union as China rises.

India’s Dilemma

The rise of China is another thing that binds India and the European Union with each other. They both will use their economic might to challenge China in Eurasian. On the other hand, India is also countering China in the Indo-Pacific Ocean as the USA facilitates India with ‘The Quad’ cooperation. The Quad consists of the US, India, Australia, and Japan. India has also mobilized its military in the region to counter any future Chinese development that may occur.

US’ Interest in the Matter

However, seeing all this depicts that the US is trying to perpetuate India. The US has been trying to counter China in the region. To do so, India serves as the best ally. Nonetheless, it is still yet to see how well the Indo-European collaboration will work against the rise of China in the region.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

The Taliban’s Broken Promises: Time for a New U.S. Strategy in Afghanistan

The Taliban’s Broken Promises: Time for a New U.S. Strategy in Afghanistan

Since the Taliban’s return to power, Afghanistan has once again become a hub for militant activity despite their promises under the 2020 Doha Accord. UN and SIGAR reports reveal that Afghan soil now shelters TTP, Al-Qaeda, and ISIS-K operatives involved in cross-border attacks, particularly against Pakistan. The Taliban’s failure to uphold intra-Afghan dialogue, misuse of international aid, human rights abuses, and deception in regional agreements have eroded trust globally. With terror networks thriving under their protection, it is time for the U.S. and international community to adopt a new, accountable strategy toward Afghanistan’s Taliban regime.

Read More »
Instability as Strategy: How India Benefits from the Afghan-Pakistan Breakdown

Instability as Strategy: How India Benefits from the Afghan-Pakistan Breakdown

The escalating tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan’s Taliban-led regime have reignited South Asia’s most volatile frontier. As cross-border attacks intensify and the Taliban refuses to dismantle the Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), Islamabad faces mounting security and sovereignty challenges. Yet, amid this chaos, India emerges as the silent beneficiary, leveraging regional instability to weaken Pakistan strategically while maintaining its image as a victim of terrorism. This calculated exploitation threatens to entrench South Asia in a new cycle of proxy conflict.

Read More »
Five years after the Doha Accord, the Taliban break commitments, harbor terrorists, exclude women and minorities, and defy international agreements.

Broken Promises, Renewed Threats: Time to Hold TTA Accountable

Five years after the Doha Accord, the Taliban have broken key commitments: 5,000 released prisoners returned to combat, 89% of government posts are held by Pashtuns, and women remain barred from education and work. Afghan soil hosts 6,000–6,500 TTP and Al-Qaeda fighters, with TTP chief Noor Wali Mehsud receiving $43,000/month. Pakistan has neutralized 267 Afghan terrorists in 2025, while 58 terrorist camps operate under Taliban knowledge. Despite the US aid, compliance is minimal. International recognition and support must now be tied to verifiable reforms to prevent further regional instability.

Read More »
The Istanbul dialogue between Pakistan and the Afghan Taliban collapsed over the TTP issue, exposing the limits of regional diplomacy and mediation.

The Istanbul Dialogue: How the Taliban’s Intransigence Doomed Diplomacy

The highly anticipated Istanbul dialogue, facilitated by Turkey and Qatar, has ended in deadlock. The Taliban’s refusal to act against the Tehrik-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) and their introduction of provocative counter-demands have effectively derailed the diplomatic process, underscoring the ideological rigidity driving Kabul’s foreign policy.

Read More »
Centralized Power and the Core–Periphery Divide in Afghanistan

Centralized Power and the Core–Periphery Divide in Afghanistan

The Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan’s return in 2021 brought rapid consolidation of power, but also the revival of a historical flaw. By concentrating authority in the hands of southern Pashtun elites, the Taliban have recreated the core–periphery divide that has destabilized every Afghan regime since the 19th century. This hyper-centralization, rooted in ethnic exclusivity and Kandahar dominance, risks a repeat of past collapses as non-Pashtun regions turn toward functional autonomy.

Read More »