April 21st in History the First Battle of Panipat (1526)

The First Battle of Panipat took place on April 21, 1526, between the forces of Zahiruddin Mohammad Babur and the Afghan King Ibrahim Lodi. It happened in northern India. That marked the beginning of the rule of the Mughal Empire and the fall of the Delhi Sultanate. In the Indian Subcontinent, it was one of the first battles to use gunpowder cannon and field artillery. The Mughals had adopted this method.

History

The Lodi dynasty had ruled Delhi since 1206. Babur, after failing to conquer Samarkand, moved to Chenab in 1519. He initially planned to keep Punjab but then in 1524, he decided to take on the Lodi dynasty. Lodi dynasty was trembling by then. Babur moved further up north of India and conquered Lahore. The northern region at the time was under Lodhi. After a failed attempt by the Afghan King Ibrahim Lodi’s uncle to capture Delhi, Babur took the position in Panipat.

The Battle

Babur defended his right flank towards the city of Panipat, thus digging a trench covered in tree branches to protect his left flanks, after learning of the strength and numbers of Ibrahim’s army. He arranged 700 carts in the middle and tied them together with ropes. There were breastworks for his matchlock men between every two carts. Babur also made sure that his soldiers had enough room to rest and fire their weapons. Due to the Ottomans’ prior use of this tool during the Battle of Chaldiran, Babur referred to it as the “Ottoman device.”

Ibrahim’s army arrived and discovered that the road to Babur’s army was too small to assault. While Ibrahim repositioned his troops to accommodate the narrower front, Babur seized the opportunity to flank (Tulghuma) the Lodi army. As the fighting turned against them, many of Ibrahim’s forces were unable to get into action and fled. Ibrahim Lodi was beheaded after being killed while attempting to flee. The war claimed the lives of 20,000 Lodi troops.

Babur’s War Strategy

Babur’s weapons were decisive in combat. Particularly because Ibrahim’s army lacked field artillery. Moreover, the sound of the cannon scared Ibrahim’s elephants, which forced them to tramp his own soldiers.

Babur’s war tactics included the Tulguhma and Araba. Tulguhma referred to the division of the whole army into three units: The Left, the Right, and the Middle. Additionally, the units divided further into subdivisions, in terms of right and left. Therefore, this allowed the army to surround the enemy from all sides.

According to history, Ibrahim Lodi died on the Battlefield.  Alongside him, 20,000 of his men died as well. The battle of Panipat was a decisive military success for the Timurids. In terms of politics, it gave Babur new lands and kicked off a new era in the long-running Mughal Empire in the heart of the Indian Subcontinent.

Abdullah Kayani

Muhammad Abdullah Kayani is a budding scholar with a keen interest in current affairs and news reporting. With a passion for uncovering and analyzing events shaping our world, he aims to inform and engage audiences through insightful commentary and diligent reporting.

Recent

Is Social Media Neutral?

Is Social Media Neutral?

Social media platforms are not neutral arenas of free expression. Powered by opaque algorithms and AI-driven amplification, they increasingly shape political narratives and public perception, prompting non-Western states to frame platform regulation not as censorship, but as a question of digital and cognitive sovereignty.

Read More »
The Mainstreaming of Islamophobia

The Mainstreaming of Islamophobia

The attack on a Victorian Imam and his wife in Melbourne is not an isolated crime but the logical outcome of a political climate that has normalized Islamophobia. As anti-Muslim rhetoric moves from the fringes into mainstream Western discourse, religious identity is recast as a security threat, creating the conditions for violence and unequal protection under the law.

Read More »
Pakistan’s shift from arms importer to defense exporter reveals how indigenous military industry has become central to sovereignty in a fragmented global order.

Pakistan’s Defense Industrial Breakout

As the liberal international order fragments, Pakistan has executed a decisive shift from defense dependency to indigenous production. Through exports, combat validation, and joint industrialization, Islamabad is redefining sovereignty as an industrial and diplomatic asset.

Read More »
A critical reassessment of Afghan repatriation from Pakistan, weighing human rights advocacy against state sovereignty, security, and legal realities.

Rethinking Afghan Repatriation from Pakistan

Amnesty International’s call to halt Afghan repatriation overlooks the limits of long-term hospitality. For Pakistan, the issue is less about abandoning rights than reasserting sovereign immigration control amid shifting realities in Afghanistan.

Read More »