Torkham Tensions: Afghan Forces Withdraw Excavator After Jirga Intervention

Afghan jirga intervenes as tensions rise at Torkham; excavator removed, ceasefire talks continue amid border dispute.

Torkham, March 10 – The border tensions between Pakistan and Afghanistan took a new turn as Afghan security forces withdrew an excavator from the disputed Jungle Post following intervention by a high-level Jirga. The withdrawal comes after Pakistani Jirga members and Khyber Chamber elders strongly objected to the continued construction activities by Afghan forces, which they said violated a prior agreement.

Earlier today, Pakistani representatives informed the Afghan delegation that the ongoing border construction was in direct contradiction to the traditional Pashtun Jirga customs and previous commitments. In response, Afghan Jirga members agreed to halt construction and ordered the removal of the excavator from the site.

A second session of the Jirga is expected soon to further ease tensions and discuss a potential resolution, which could lead to the reopening of the Torkham gate, a vital trade route between the two nations.

Also See: Torkham Border Closure Enters Third Week Amid Rising Clashes

Jirga Meeting: Pakistan’s Key Demands

On Sunday, March 9, a high-level Jirga meeting between Pakistani and Afghan representatives was convened to address the escalating situation at the Torkham border. The Pakistani delegation, led by Landi Kotal Jirga elders, put forward three key demands:

  • A ceasefire by March 11
  • A halt to military construction on both sides
  • Immediate reopening of the border

Additionally, it was decided that Jirga representatives would inspect Afghan military constructions along the border on March 11 to assess the situation. However, Pakistani Jirga elders expressed concerns that the Afghan delegation lacked decision-making authority and would need to consult their leadership, particularly the Torkham Commissioner, before giving a final response.

Agreement Violated Within 24 Hours

Despite the Jirga negotiations, Afghan forces resumed construction work the very next day, breaching the agreement. Images from the site confirm the ongoing military activity, which has kept the Torkham border closed for over 17 days.

The prolonged closure has severely impacted local traders, transporters, and communities on both sides, who have urged Afghan authorities to halt further construction on Pakistani-controlled land so that trade and movement can resume.

The Root of the Dispute: The “2 Number Packet” Checkpoint

At the center of the tensions lies a disputed checkpoint known as “2 Number Packet”, which historically falls under Pakistani territory.

  • During the reign of King Zahir Shah (1933–1973), Afghanistan transferred this area to Pakistan as part of a water agreement.
  • The site remains under Pakistani control, but Afghan forces have begun constructing a new check post below the existing Pakistani position.

Torkham Jirga Proposes Temporary Ceasefire

To defuse the crisis, a Jirga was held at Torkham Zero Point two days ago. During this meeting, Pakistan proposed a one-month ceasefire and called on Afghanistan to stop unilateral border construction. Afghan delegates, however, requested more time to consult their leadership before committing to any agreement.

With the Torkham border closed for over two weeks, the economic losses and humanitarian concerns continue to mount.

Will the Border Reopen?

The situation now hinges on Afghanistan’s response on March 11. If Afghan authorities show flexibility, the border could be reopened swiftly. However, if construction continues, the dispute may escalate further.

For now, the region remains on edge as diplomatic negotiations continue.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

Pakistan’s shift from arms importer to defense exporter reveals how indigenous military industry has become central to sovereignty in a fragmented global order.

Pakistan’s Defense Industrial Breakout

As the liberal international order fragments, Pakistan has executed a decisive shift from defense dependency to indigenous production. Through exports, combat validation, and joint industrialization, Islamabad is redefining sovereignty as an industrial and diplomatic asset.

Read More »
A critical reassessment of Afghan repatriation from Pakistan, weighing human rights advocacy against state sovereignty, security, and legal realities.

Rethinking Afghan Repatriation from Pakistan

Amnesty International’s call to halt Afghan repatriation overlooks the limits of long-term hospitality. For Pakistan, the issue is less about abandoning rights than reasserting sovereign immigration control amid shifting realities in Afghanistan.

Read More »
Andy Halus’s interview signals a shift in US–Pakistan relations toward minerals, education, and soft power, marking a post-security partnership in 2026.

The New Architecture of US–Pakistan Relations

Andy Halus’s interview signals a strategic shift in US–Pakistan relations from security-centric ties to a multidimensional partnership centered on minerals, education, and soft power. Projects like Reko Diq now stand as the key test of this new architecture.

Read More »