Champions Trophy 2025: Pakistan’s Cricket Obsession—At What Cost?

Is Pakistan’s love for cricket holding back its sporting future? With world-class talent in hockey, squash, and athletics sidelined, it's time to spread the investment.

Pakistan’s early exit from the International Cricket Council (ICC) Champions Trophy 2025 isn’t just a sporting failure—it’s a reflection of our deeply flawed sports priorities. Cricket has monopolized Pakistan’s sporting landscape for decades, consuming billions in funding while other sports, where Pakistan has a proven track record of success, are left to wither. The question is: why does Pakistan treat cricket as the only game worth investing in while consistently ignoring other sports that have brought international glory?

Let’s talk about the numbers. The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) enjoys a lavish budget, approving PKR 15 billion for cricket-related activities in 2022-23, with 78% of that amount funneled into domestic and international cricket events. Meanwhile, Pakistan’s entire sports sector received a mere PKR 3.47 billion in the 2022-23 budget—less than a quarter of what cricket alone receives.

In the 2023-24 budget, the government announced a PKR 5 billion allocation to promote sports at the grassroots level, aiming to integrate athletics into schools, colleges, and professional sports. Finance Minister Ishaq Dar, while presenting the budget, emphasized the need for a healthier, more active society. Yet, despite this pledge, Pakistan’s non-cricket sports federations—hockey, athletics, squash, and others—continue to struggle with a lack of investment, infrastructure, and institutional support.

The Stark Budget Disparity: How Other Sports Are Left Behind

The Pakistan Sports Board (PSB) has allocated over PKR 500 million to various sports federations and athletes for the 2023-24 financial year. In 2022-23, the amount exceeded PKR 420 million, while in 2020-21, just over PKR 40 million was allocated. The year 2021-22 saw PKR 69.5 million, while 2019-20 had a mere PKR 25 million.

The documents reveal that the Pakistan Hockey Federation received PKR 103.6 million over the past five years, with PKR 59 million allocated last year. The Athletics Federation was given over PKR 100 million, and the Volleyball Federation received a grant of PKR 100 million for 2023-24 alone, totaling over PKR 115 million in the past five years.

The PSB also allocated PKR 70 million to the Athletics Federation for 2023-24, PKR 70 million to the Netball Federation over five years, and PKR 65 million in the last two years. The Taekwondo Federation received PKR 60 million, and the Tennis Federation was allocated nearly PKR 49 million.

Additionally, the Squash Federation received PKR 50 million, the Rifle Association was given PKR 26.5 million, the Boxing Federation received PKR 30.5 million, the Pakistan Billiards and Snooker Association received PKR 24.7 million, and the Cycling Federation was allocated nearly PKR 40 million.

Despite these allocations, the disparity remains glaring—non-cricket sports must divide a budget that cricket alone exceeds multiple times over. Cricket eats up the lion’s share of funds, yet its performance on the global stage has been inconsistent at best.

Pakistan has played in 13 Cricket World Cups since 1975, yet has won just one title, in 1992. The only other time it made the final was in 1999, only to lose comprehensively. That means for 11 out of 13 World Cups, Pakistan has failed to reach the final. while other sports that have brought home Olympic medals, world titles, and historic victories remain in the shadows due to chronic neglect.  This lack of consistent success is even more frustrating when compared to sports that have delivered on the world stage despite receiving little to no investment.

Take field hockey, for instance. Once Pakistan’s pride, hockey brought home three Olympic gold medals (1960, 1968, 1984) and remains the only sport where Pakistan holds the record for most World Cup titles (four wins). Yet, today, it struggles even to qualify for international tournaments due to lack of funding. Similarly, Pakistan dominated squash for nearly 40 years, thanks to legends like Jahangir Khan and Jansher Khan, who won 16 British Open titles and 14 World Opens. Snooker, another overlooked sport, saw Mohammad Yousuf become World Snooker Champion in 1994 with little state support. More recently, Arshad Nadeem made history by winning Pakistan’s first-ever Olympic gold medal in athletics (2024, Javelin Throw), again with minimal resources.

Also See: Pakistan Knocked Out of ICC Men’s Champions Trophy 2025 as Hosts

Why Is Cricket the Only Sport That Gets Attention?

Yet, despite these achievements, Pakistan remains fixated on cricket. Even cricketing icons seem stuck in the past—Wasim Akram and Shoaib Akhtar still dominate endorsements, while fresh talent struggles to gain recognition. Contrast this with countries like the United Kingdom, where David Beckham remains as relevant as England’s top cricketers, or China, where basketball and athletics stars are just as celebrated as those in other sports. Why does Pakistan continue to operate under a one-sport mentality?

The Champions Trophy 2025 should serve as a wake-up call. Pakistan’s Northern regions—Khyber Pakhtunkhwa and Gilgit-Baltistan—are natural breeding grounds for extreme sports like mountaineering, paragliding, and cycling. The country has raw, untapped talent in hockey, squash, snooker, and athletics that could bring home medals and global recognition, but only if they receive the funding and attention cricket does.

It’s time to rethink our priorities. Why should billions be poured into cricket when other sports have delivered global victories with little to no support? Why do we continue to reward mediocrity in cricket while ignoring athletes who have brought genuine honor to the country? Pakistan has the potential to be a multi-sport nation, but first, it needs to stop acting like cricket is the only game that matters.

The numbers speak for themselves—Pakistan’s sports policy is not just cricket-centric; it is cricket-obsessed, often at the cost of disciplines where the country has genuine, world-class potential. If we truly want to revive Pakistan’s sporting dominance, we must break free from this one-dimensional approach. It’s time to invest in a broader spectrum of sports, provide infrastructure and funding for athletes across disciplines, and finally recognize the talents that have been waiting in the wings for far too long.

SAT Editorial Desk

Your go-to editorial hub for policy perspectives and informed analysis on pressing regional and global issues.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »