India’s Chabahar Plans Stumble After US Waiver Reversal

US rescinds Chabahar port sanctions waiver, impacting India, Afghanistan, and shifting South Asia's trade dynamics. [Image via Getty Images]

Islamabad: February 10, 2025. — In a move with significant regional implications, the United States has rescinded the sanctions waiver on Iran’s Chabahar port project, following an executive order issued by President Trump on February 6, 2025. The decision, aimed at tightening economic pressure on Iran, is expected to ripple through South Asian trade corridors, directly affecting India, Afghanistan, and the broader region.

The executive order directs the Secretary of State to “modify or rescind sanctions waivers, particularly those that provide Iran any degree of economic or financial relief, including those related to Iran’s Chabahar port project.” This marks a shift in U.S. policy that previously allowed India to develop and utilize the strategic port to facilitate trade with Afghanistan, bypassing Pakistan.

Also See: No Messages Exchanged Between Iran and US Since Trump’s Return, Says Iranian Deputy FM

US Justifies Decision on Security Grounds

In a statement, President Trump emphasized national security concerns: “Iran remains the world’s leading state sponsor of terror and continues to pose an existential threat through its nuclear ambitions, support for terrorist groups, and aggressive regional activities.” The administration cited Iran’s involvement in supporting Hezbollah, Hamas, and the Houthis, as well as its ballistic missile programs and human rights abuses.

The U.S. aims to impose “maximum pressure” to curtail Iran’s nuclear capabilities and regional influence, with specific measures targeting Iran’s financial and shipping sectors. “We must deny Iran all paths to a nuclear weapon and end the regime’s nuclear extortion racket,” the statement added.

Regional Reactions: India Faces Strategic Setback

India, which has invested billions into Chabahar as part of its strategy to establish an alternative trade route circumventing Pakistan, now faces a major geopolitical hurdle. The project was not just about commerce; it symbolized India’s aspirations for regional hegemony and influence. Analysts suggest that India’s ambitions may face a significant reality check as the U.S. decision injects uncertainty into Chabahar’s future.

“Chabahar was never just about trade—it was India’s geopolitical tool to assert dominance. With the waiver in question, its ambitions now seem to face a serious reality check,” said Haleema Khaldi, Editor of South Asia Times (SAT).

“Afghanistan, which had touted Chabahar as an alternative to reliance on Pakistani routes amid Pakistan-Afghanistan tensions over Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP), is also left in limbo. The port was seen as a lifeline for Afghan trade, especially after the Taliban’s return to power. With the waiver rescinded, Kabul must reassess its trade dependencies”, said Salman Javed, Director South Asia Times while commenting on the development.

Pakistan’s Strategic Advantage

Pakistan, meanwhile, appears to gain an inadvertent advantage. As Chabahar’s prospects dim, Pakistan’s role as a vital trade corridor, bolstered by projects like the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), becomes more prominent. “While India’s investment hangs by a thread, Pakistan’s connectivity projects move forward without the risk of sanctions. Stability beats uncertainty,” noted a trade analyst.

Geopolitical Ramifications

The move is expected to further complicate the already tense dynamics between the U.S., Iran, and South Asian countries. It also raises questions about Washington’s commitment to supporting India’s strategic goals in the region, despite the growing Indo-U.S. partnership in other areas.

As the dust settles, countries like India and Afghanistan are left grappling with the repercussions of a shifting geopolitical landscape, where economic investments can be upended by political decisions beyond their control.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »