Upendra Dwivedi’s ‘Blame Pakistan’ Game: Will It Ever End

Indian Army Chief Gen Dwivedi's blame on Pakistan for Kashmir terrorism falls apart as evidence reveals India's own role in destabilizing the region. [Image via Press Trust of India]

Same script, different day—will the cycle of accusations ever end?

India’s recent claims by Army Chief General Upendra Dwivedi, accusing Pakistan of being the “epicenter of terrorism” in Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK), stand in stark contrast to well-documented facts. Such allegations are not just misleading but serve as a smokescreen for India’s own state-sponsored terrorism in IIOJK, where Indian security forces routinely engage in extrajudicial killings, torture, and other human rights abuses. India’s military presence in Kashmir has long been associated with daily atrocities against innocent civilians, which international human rights organizations have extensively documented.

Dwivedi’s accusations reflect a growing frustration within India’s military leadership, attempting to deflect attention from the improprieties of their own actions onto. His statements underscore India’s inability to address the root causes of violence in Kashmir, opting instead to falsely attribute all the region’s instability to external forces.

Dwivedi’s persistent ‘Blame Pakistan’ rhetoric not only lacks substance but also detracts from the pressing need for India to introspect its policies in IIOJK and beyond.

Also See: The Kashmir Tragedy: A Genocide Ignored

Why Indian General Upendra Dwivedi’s ‘Blame Pakistan’ Game Don’t Hold Up

Let’s take a look at the data-driven reality:

  • Pakistan’s credible counterterrorism measures are evident in its removal from the FATF Grey List in October 2022, showcasing robust reforms in Anti-Money Laundering (AML) and Counter Financing of Terrorism (CFT), disproving India’s baseless allegations.
  • International recognition of Pakistan’s efforts in counterterrorism further debunks India’s narrative. The country’s 2020 Dossier, detailing India’s links to terrorist groups like BLA, BRA, BLF, and TTP, is a testament to India’s role in destabilizing its neighbors—a clear strategy to undermine Pakistan’s sovereignty and economic stability.
  • India’s judicial failures in cases like the Samjhauta Express blast (2007) and Gujarat riots (2002) reflect its systemic failure to hold extremists accountable. In a particularly telling move, Swami Aseemanand, the mastermind behind the Samjhauta attack that killed 43 Pakistanis, was acquitted by an Indian court, exposing India’s tolerance for extremism.
  • The 26/11 Mumbai attacks trial, where India withheld critical evidence to hinder Pakistan’s judicial process, further strengthens the case that India uses terror as a political tool to malign its neighbors.
  • RAW agent Kulbhushan Jadhav’s arrest in Pakistan for espionage and terrorism adds irrefutable evidence of India’s direct involvement in subversive activities aimed at destabilizing Pakistan.

India’s sponsorship of militants targeting CPEC projects further exposes its desire to derail regional connectivity and economic progress. This disruption is part of a broader strategy to thwart Pakistan’s economic growth and maintain regional hegemony.

In light of these revelations, India must reform its own counterterrorism framework and stop making baseless accusations against Pakistan. It is crucial for the international community to hold India accountable for its destabilizing actions and its disinformation campaign against Pakistan. Global oversight should compel India to cease using terrorism as a political weapon and push for a genuine commitment to peace and security in South Asia.

SAT Commentaries’ are social media threads by various authors, reproduced here for website use. Views are their own.

SAT Commentary

SAT Commentaries, a collection of insightful social media threads on current events and social issues, featuring diverse perspectives from various authors.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »