AJK PM Urges United Nations to Implement Kashmir Resolutions

PM AJK urges United Nations to fulfill its promise of Kashmir's right to self-determination, condemns India's oppression. [Image via APP]

Prime Minister Azad Kashmir (PM AJK) Chaudhry Anwar ul Haq has said that it was incumbent upon the United Nations to help implement its resolutions on Kashmir that guaranteed right to self determination to the people of Kashmir.

In his message issued on the eve of Right to Self-Determination Day being observed by Kashmiris annually on 5 January, the AJK premier regrettably noted that the promise made to Kashmiri people remains unfulfilled despite the lapse of over seven decades.

“The United Nations had guaranteed the right of self-determination to the people of Jammu and Kashmir and called for holding referandum in the region to allow the Kashmiri people to exercise their birth right and determine their political future through a free, fair and impartial plebiscite”, the PM said, adding that it was high time that the world body should discharge its legal and moral responsibility in this regard.

“Despite India’s relentless oppression, the people of Kashmir are sticking to their demand for the right to self-determination”, he said.

The PM said that India’s policy of intransigence and perpetual denial to hold plebiscite in Kashmir were detrimental for peace and stability in South Asia.

Also See: Pakistan’s President Reaffirms Support for Kashmiri Rights

Referring to the continued bloodshed and violence in the restive region, the PM AJK said that the United Nations and other human rights organizations should play their role in investigating the ongoing human rights violations in the Indian held territory and hold India accountable for the war crimes it’s forces have been committing against the Kashmiri people.

Reiterating his government’s all support to Kashmiris’ legitimate struggle, the PM said that the supreme sacrifices rendered by the Kashmiri martyrs would not be allowed to go in vain.

”The day is not far away when Kashmiris will achieve their goal of freedom”, the PM said, adding that nothing short of freedom can satisfy Kashmiris’ aspirations.

Lauding Pakistan’s continued political moral and diplomatic support to the Kashmiris’ just cause, the PM said that the people and government of Pakistan would never give up their moral, political and diplomatic support to the people of occupied Jammu and Kashmir.

He said that Kashmiris have rejected India’s 5th August 2019 decision that led to further disintegration of the state. “The people of Kashmir have also completely rejected the Indian Supreme Court verdict that put the stamp of approval to Modi government’s controversial decision to abrogate article 370 and 35A of the Indian constitution under which the Jammu Kashmir was guaranteed special status”, he added.

He said that the international community, particularly the United Nations should take strict notice of the Indian government’s actions and play their due role to settle this lingering dispute on the basis of the universally accepted principle of right to self-determination.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »