India Wages Technological War on China

A technology war between neighbors

India and China seemed to be caught up in a war over technology. As technology drives geopolitics it is establishing a new status quo. Today technology is the first way nations react to incidents around the world. It is a paradigm change from the past where governments have concentrated on oil or trade.

The beginning of the India and China tech war can be seen when India blocked common Chinese apps.  Amongst those blocked were Chinese social platforms TikTok and WeChat. Moreover, the Indian government is also questioning if Huawei and ZTE will be barred from developing their 5G (fifth generation) telecoms network. This competitiveness, however, does not seem to bother China, as much as India would have liked.

What could be next?

Furthermore, analysts argue that if India really decided to harm China, it should have hit the consumer goods firms. Those businesses are China\’s national pride. From Oppo to Vivo to Xiaomi to Haier to Lenovo. They are the ones who create the \”software force\” for China. As well as being the modern global footprint for Beijing. Each of those businesses ranks India as their biggest international market.

Hence, the first attack by India sent out a warning. It was something of a tactical attack.

Why did India not attack certain products companies?

The explanation for this is that India is deliberately opting for incremental escalation. It had to retaliate for the death of its soldiers during the border clash, but it didn\’t want to launch an all-out economic war with China. Additionally, if India retaliates exponentially, China might do the same. Including baring shipments of generic products or car parts to India. Instantly disrupting India\’s pharmaceutical and automobile industries.

How will China react?

China could hurt Indian information technology firms such as Infosys, TCS, and Wipro. Both of these companies are spending in China. Moreover, China could force the firm out of the country. It could even prosecute key India executives staying in China.

Similarly, China could also tell its venture capital firms not to recruit Indian talent. Skilled people in India and China will become pawns. Thus, the tech war could become a war for talent.

Third, in technology geopolitics, China might activate \”nuclear options.\” It could, literally, use geo-engineering to change the climate in India. China is now working on a huge rainfall raising scheme in Tibet. China is constructing infrastructure three times the scale of Spain. Tibet is India \’s principal source of water. Via geo-engineering, China could begin controlling the water supplies of India.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »