Iran to Build Chahbahar Railway Project Themselves

Chahbahar project details

Iran has decided to build the Chahbahar railway project on its own after delays in funding of the project by India. This 610-kilometer railway line will connect Iran’s Chabahar port to its Iran’s Sistan and Pakistan’s Baluchistan province Zahedan. It will eventually stretch to Zaranj on the Afghan side, enabling hassle-free trade. The railway project will carry nearly one million passengers and 800,000 metric tons of freight in its first year of operation in 2022.

Reluctance by Indian authorities in bringing required funding and equipment has caused this decision. Iranian authorities have started track laying of 610 kilometers railway after acquiring finance by tapping Iran’s sovereign wealth fund.

What the Indian Media Says

According to the Indian news outlet “The Hindu” report, India was a major contributor to develop Iran’s south-east port Chabahar. This undertaking is about 50,60 miles away from Pakistan’s deep-sea port Gwadar. India sees Gwadar port as a strategic threat due to its importance under China’s OBOR flagship project CPEC. On the other side, India was also reluctant to actively take part in the development of Chabahar due to American sanctions.

Iran\’s Deputy of Ports and Maritime\’s views

Meanwhile, according to “Al-Jazeera” a deputy to Iran\’s Ports and Maritime Organization. Farhad Montaser, called the story \”totally false because Iran has not inked any deal with India regarding the Zahedan-Chabahar\” railway. The news report quoted him as saying \”We had a list of Indian investments in Chabahar port. This also included the issue of Chabahar railway infrastructure and the railway, but during the negotiations, it was not agreed upon.\”

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »
The Afghan Crucible

The Afghan Crucible

Recent reporting underscores Afghanistan’s transformation into a strategic hub for transnational jihadist networks. Far from being a localized security problem, the Afghan landscape now functions as an ideological, logistical, and digital anchor linking extremist affiliates across Africa, Southeast Asia, and beyond, signaling the collapse of regional containment and the rise of a globalized threat architecture.

Read More »
Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Strategic competition has moved beyond decisive wars toward a subtler synthesis of economic leverage, proxy networks, and calibrated force. Infrastructure, finance, and trade routes now function as instruments of power, quietly reshaping regional orders while preserving the façade of restraint. In this environment, security is no longer confined to the battlefield but embedded in supply chains, data networks, and development choices, forcing states to rethink deterrence, sovereignty, and resilience.

Read More »
The Manufacturing of a False Equivalence

The Manufacturing of a False Equivalence

As scrutiny mounts over the Taliban’s tolerance of TTP sanctuaries, Kabul has attempted to deflect blame by alleging that ISIS-K operates from Pakistan. This false equivalence ignores the historical origins of ISIS-K in eastern Afghanistan, its sustained campaign of violence against Pakistan, and verified intelligence showing that the group’s operational depth remains rooted inside Afghan territory.

Read More »