Kartarpur Sahib Corridor: India, Pakistan renew pact

India and Pakistan renew the Kartarpur Sahib Corridor pact, allowing uninterrupted pilgrimage access. Talks on cricketing ties explored.

Less than a week after External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar visited Islamabad and met Pakistan Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif and Deputy Prime Minister Mohammad Ishaq Dar, India and Pakistan on Tuesday agreed to renew their pact on the Kartarpur Sahib Corridor for another five years. The pact was due to lapse on October 24.

India and Pakistan have agreed through diplomatic channels to extend the Sri Kartarpur Sahib Corridor agreement for another five years. The Ministry of External Affairs (MEA) stated that the agreement was signed on October 24, 2019. It facilitates pilgrims’ visits from India to Gurdwara Darbar Sahib Kartarpur in Narowal, Pakistan. The agreement was initially valid for five years.

It said the “extension of the validity of this agreement will ensure uninterrupted operation of the Corridor for use by the pilgrims from India to visit the holy gurdwara in Pakistan”.

In view of the continued requests of pilgrims regarding the removal of US$ 20 service charge levied by Pakistan per pilgrim per visit, India has once again urged Pakistan to not levy any fee on the pilgrims, it said.

The 4 km-long Kartarpur Corridor provides visa-free access to Indian Sikh pilgrims to visit Gurdwara Darbar Sahib, the final resting place of Sikhism founder Guru Nanak Dev.

The authorities opened the Corridor in November 2019 but suspended movement in March 2020 when the pandemic struck. They reopened it later.

Also See: India foreign minister’s visit a ‘good beginning’: Nawaz Sharif

India and Pakistan’s Renewed Diplomacy

The development comes days after Jaishankar visited Pakistan on October 15-16. He attended the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) meeting of the Council of Heads of Government. This marked the first visit by an Indian Foreign Minister since Sushma Swaraj went to Islamabad for the Heart of Asia meeting in December 2015.

Jaishankar and Dar, who is also Pakistan’s Foreign Minister, spoke twice in less than 24 hours. This marked the first direct conversation between India and Pakistan’s Foreign Ministers since 2015. There were indications that these talks explored the idea of resuming some form of cricketing ties between the two countries, as reported by The Indian Express.

However, sources underlined that both sides needed to think through these very preliminary conversations, given the years-long freeze in ties between the two countries. But the talks open a window, with a possible first step being Pakistan’s hosting of the Champions Trophy next February.

Jaishankar’s Visit Sparks Hopes

Jaishankar and Dar had met on October 15 evening at the dinner hosted by Prime Minister Sharif at his residence. After exchanging pleasantries and a few words as they shook hands, the two ministers had a conversation over dinner, sources said. Sources indicated that the ministers decided to continue the conversation over lunch the next day. They seated themselves next to each other at this lunch.

However, the MEA spokesperson stated that the two ministers did not meet and did not discuss cricketing ties.

On October 17, former Pakistan Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif emphasized that India and Pakistan should “bury the past” and “think of the future.” He stated that Jaishankar’s visit to Islamabad was a “good beginning” and a “good opening.” Sharif added that the two countries “should move forward from here.”

This news is sourced from Indian Express and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »
The Afghan Crucible

The Afghan Crucible

Recent reporting underscores Afghanistan’s transformation into a strategic hub for transnational jihadist networks. Far from being a localized security problem, the Afghan landscape now functions as an ideological, logistical, and digital anchor linking extremist affiliates across Africa, Southeast Asia, and beyond, signaling the collapse of regional containment and the rise of a globalized threat architecture.

Read More »
Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Strategic competition has moved beyond decisive wars toward a subtler synthesis of economic leverage, proxy networks, and calibrated force. Infrastructure, finance, and trade routes now function as instruments of power, quietly reshaping regional orders while preserving the façade of restraint. In this environment, security is no longer confined to the battlefield but embedded in supply chains, data networks, and development choices, forcing states to rethink deterrence, sovereignty, and resilience.

Read More »
The Manufacturing of a False Equivalence

The Manufacturing of a False Equivalence

As scrutiny mounts over the Taliban’s tolerance of TTP sanctuaries, Kabul has attempted to deflect blame by alleging that ISIS-K operates from Pakistan. This false equivalence ignores the historical origins of ISIS-K in eastern Afghanistan, its sustained campaign of violence against Pakistan, and verified intelligence showing that the group’s operational depth remains rooted inside Afghan territory.

Read More »