On June 27th, 2024, United States President Joe Biden, and former President Donald Trump faced off in a fiery clash in the first 2024 US Presidential Debate for the US election campaign. They debated the fate of American democracy, immigration, the economy, abortion, foreign policy, and their respective legal issues. The debate was marked by intense personal attacks and differing visions for the country’s future.
The debate was a spectacle of personal attacks, age-related jabs, and even remarks about golf, resembling a political circus more than a serious discussion.
Experts lamented that neither candidate convinced the American public of their suitability for the presidency. The debate highlighted “why many Americans are distressed and disillusioned with their options.” Biden appeared to “stutter and stumble over the truth,” presenting himself weakly, while Trump seemed “strong and energetic,” though his rhetoric was riddled with falsehoods. These factors contributed to the debate being less well-received than those in 2016 and 2020. Let’s take a look at some key statements and analyze them.
2024 US Presidential Debate: Key Moments and Fact-Checks
Immigration
Immigration was a particularly contentious issue. Trump falsely claimed that many migrants were killing “hundreds of thousands of people”. He accused Biden of being responsible for their deaths. He asserted that illegal migrants were living in luxury hotels, contrasting it with veterans who are homeless. Moreover, he labeled this as “Biden-migrant crime,” accusing Biden of deliberately opening the border to enable such situations. Biden countered that every statement from Trump on this topic was a lie. Although Biden’s administration had a border security deal with Republicans, Trump later urged The Republicans – Grand Old Party (GOP) to block the bill. Experts noted that Trump’s party now sees immigration as a key campaign issue.
Fact Check
Migrants do not have a higher crime rate than native-born Americans. Additionally, the claim that Biden allowed unrestricted immigration is false. Recent data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shows a decline in the number of migrants and asylum seekers apprehended at the US-Mexico border.
Migrants at Tijuana-San Diego border hope for easier US immigration after Title-42 expiration, seen May 11, 2023. [Image via Al Jazeera]
Abortion
Trump agreed with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision not to ban mifepristone, contradicting many Republicans. He also advocated for states’ rights to decide on abortion laws and falsely claimed that reintroducing Roe v. Wade would allow unrestricted late-term abortions, suggesting that doctors could terminate pregnancies in the ninth month or even after birth. Biden refuted this, stating that Roe v. Wade does not permit such actions and pledged to reinstate abortion rights.
Fact Check
The term “partial-birth abortion” refers to a procedure known as dilation and extraction, or D&X, which has been federally prohibited for over 15 years. Late-term abortions are very rare, with 93 percent occurring before 13 weeks of gestation, six percent between 14 and 20 weeks, and only one percent beyond 21 weeks. Biden emphasized that such decisions should be made by doctors, not politicians. Experts noted that Biden’s stance was somewhat awkward due to his Catholic faith, which opposes abortion.
Economy
The debate also focused on economic records, with Biden taking credit for the COVID-19 pandemic recovery and Trump boasting about overseeing “the greatest economy in the history of our country.” Both had strong performances in certain economic areas, but polls show voters generally trust Republicans more on economic issues.
Fact Check
Economic Growth: Excluding 2020, Biden has a slight edge with an annualized growth rate of about 2.9 percent compared to Trump’s just under 2.7 percent. Inflation: Biden’s term has seen much higher inflation, driven by factors like COVID-related supply chain issues. Prices have risen over 19 percent since Biden took office, compared to about 5 percent during Trump’s term at a similar point. Jobs: Both presided over strong labor markets, with Biden’s administration adding about 15.7 million jobs and unemployment reaching a 53-year low of 3.4 percent. Wages: Despite solid wage growth under both administrations, real earnings have declined under Biden due to inflation, whereas under Trump, wage growth outpaced inflation.
Foreign Policy
Foreign policy and the Middle East were referenced numerous times during the debate. Yet, the suffering of the Palestinians and the toll of Israel’s campaign in Gaza received little mention, despite growing calls for the US to reconsider its military assistance to Israel. Biden’s claim that all parties except Hamas agreed to his ceasefire proposal was misleading. Trump countered by accusing Biden of showing excessive sympathy toward Palestinians and advocating for Israel’s unrestricted pursuit of military objectives in Gaza.
Both candidates indicated their continued support for Israel, reflecting the longstanding bipartisan consensus on this issue.
US withdrawal from Afghanistan: A US Air Force aircraft takes off from the airport in Kabul [Image via AFP]
Trump accused Biden of pushing the world toward a new world war. He suggested that Russia would not have invaded Ukraine under his presidency. Additionally, he claimed that could end the conflict within a month. Trump attributed the chaos of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan to emboldening Russia’s aggression in Ukraine. He also claimed that under his administration, sanctions effectively crippled Iran. He suggested this approach prevented regional conflicts like the Hamas attack on Israel, indicating a similar stance on Iran for the future.
The 2024 US Presidential Debate held on June 27th highlighted the differing foreign policy approaches of the candidates, with Trump advocating a more pragmatic stance compared to Biden’s internationalism. Trump also criticized Biden’s handling of the Paris Climate Agreement and defended his own tariff policies, despite economists warning that raising tariffs could damage U.S. trade relations.
The first 2024 presidential debate between Biden and Trump was more of a chaotic spectacle than a constructive discussion. Both candidates struggled to present a compelling case for their presidency, leaving many Americans frustrated and disillusioned with their choices. The debate’s fact-checking revealed numerous inaccuracies and exaggerations from both sides, undermining their credibility. As the campaign continues, the challenge remains for either candidate to rise above the fray and offer a vision that resonates with the American electorate.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own. They do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of the South Asia Times.
Simran Saeed Janjua
Simran Saeed Janjua is an International Relations Researcher from National Defense University Islamabad, currently serving as research intern at South Asia Times (SAT). Her areas of research interest include traditional and non traditional security issues and foreign policy analysis. She can be reached at simransaeedjanjua@gmail.com and on X (formerly Twitter) @i_simranjanjua.
Simran Saeed Janjua
Simran Saeed Janjua is an International Relations Researcher from National Defense University Islamabad, currently serving as research intern at South Asia Times (SAT). Her areas of research interest include traditional and non traditional security issues and foreign policy analysis. She can be reached at simransaeedjanjua@gmail.com and on X (formerly Twitter) @i_simranjanjua.
Far from being an impartial recognition of pacifism, the Nobel Peace Prize’s legacy is marred by controversial laureates whose actions have been linked to immense violence. The prize is not a universal arbiter of peace but a political instrument reflecting a Western-centric worldview, rewarding figures who align with its geopolitical interests, regardless of the blood on their hands.
Eighty years after the UN’s creation to “save succeeding generations from war,” the organization stands at a breaking point. With veto paralysis, waning U.S. commitment, and global disillusionment, is the UN becoming the very institution it replaced—the League of Nations 2.0?
A recent Financial Times story claimed Pakistan was pitching a new Arabian Sea port to the US Built on anonymous sources and logical flaws, the report was quietly corrected. This article dissects how the flimsy reporting was weaponized by domestic and regional actors to push a false narrative, revealing more about their political agendas than Pakistan’s foreign policy.
A new Gaza peace plan by Donald Trump has international backing and a surprising partial acceptance from Hamas. However, its journey toward lasting peace is threatened by critical deal-breakers and the unresolved core question of Palestinian political sovereignty.
Pakistan’s growing partnership with CERN highlights its rising role in global science and technology. As the first South Asian state to become an associate member, Pakistan is advancing research, training young scientists, and opening doors for high-tech industry and innovation through its collaboration with the world’s leading particle physics center.
2024 US Presidential Debate: Biden vs. Trump Clash
On June 27th, 2024, United States President Joe Biden, and former President Donald Trump faced off in a fiery clash in the first 2024 US Presidential Debate for the US election campaign. They debated the fate of American democracy, immigration, the economy, abortion, foreign policy, and their respective legal issues. The debate was marked by intense personal attacks and differing visions for the country’s future.
Experts lamented that neither candidate convinced the American public of their suitability for the presidency. The debate highlighted “why many Americans are distressed and disillusioned with their options.” Biden appeared to “stutter and stumble over the truth,” presenting himself weakly, while Trump seemed “strong and energetic,” though his rhetoric was riddled with falsehoods. These factors contributed to the debate being less well-received than those in 2016 and 2020. Let’s take a look at some key statements and analyze them.
2024 US Presidential Debate: Key Moments and Fact-Checks
Immigration
Immigration was a particularly contentious issue. Trump falsely claimed that many migrants were killing “hundreds of thousands of people”. He accused Biden of being responsible for their deaths. He asserted that illegal migrants were living in luxury hotels, contrasting it with veterans who are homeless. Moreover, he labeled this as “Biden-migrant crime,” accusing Biden of deliberately opening the border to enable such situations. Biden countered that every statement from Trump on this topic was a lie. Although Biden’s administration had a border security deal with Republicans, Trump later urged The Republicans – Grand Old Party (GOP) to block the bill. Experts noted that Trump’s party now sees immigration as a key campaign issue.
Fact Check
Migrants do not have a higher crime rate than native-born Americans. Additionally, the claim that Biden allowed unrestricted immigration is false. Recent data from U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shows a decline in the number of migrants and asylum seekers apprehended at the US-Mexico border.
Abortion
Trump agreed with the U.S. Supreme Court’s decision not to ban mifepristone, contradicting many Republicans. He also advocated for states’ rights to decide on abortion laws and falsely claimed that reintroducing Roe v. Wade would allow unrestricted late-term abortions, suggesting that doctors could terminate pregnancies in the ninth month or even after birth. Biden refuted this, stating that Roe v. Wade does not permit such actions and pledged to reinstate abortion rights.
Fact Check
The term “partial-birth abortion” refers to a procedure known as dilation and extraction, or D&X, which has been federally prohibited for over 15 years. Late-term abortions are very rare, with 93 percent occurring before 13 weeks of gestation, six percent between 14 and 20 weeks, and only one percent beyond 21 weeks. Biden emphasized that such decisions should be made by doctors, not politicians. Experts noted that Biden’s stance was somewhat awkward due to his Catholic faith, which opposes abortion.
Economy
The debate also focused on economic records, with Biden taking credit for the COVID-19 pandemic recovery and Trump boasting about overseeing “the greatest economy in the history of our country.” Both had strong performances in certain economic areas, but polls show voters generally trust Republicans more on economic issues.
Fact Check
Economic Growth: Excluding 2020, Biden has a slight edge with an annualized growth rate of about 2.9 percent compared to Trump’s just under 2.7 percent.
Inflation: Biden’s term has seen much higher inflation, driven by factors like COVID-related supply chain issues. Prices have risen over 19 percent since Biden took office, compared to about 5 percent during Trump’s term at a similar point.
Jobs: Both presided over strong labor markets, with Biden’s administration adding about 15.7 million jobs and unemployment reaching a 53-year low of 3.4 percent.
Wages: Despite solid wage growth under both administrations, real earnings have declined under Biden due to inflation, whereas under Trump, wage growth outpaced inflation.
Foreign Policy
Foreign policy and the Middle East were referenced numerous times during the debate. Yet, the suffering of the Palestinians and the toll of Israel’s campaign in Gaza received little mention, despite growing calls for the US to reconsider its military assistance to Israel. Biden’s claim that all parties except Hamas agreed to his ceasefire proposal was misleading. Trump countered by accusing Biden of showing excessive sympathy toward Palestinians and advocating for Israel’s unrestricted pursuit of military objectives in Gaza.
Trump accused Biden of pushing the world toward a new world war. He suggested that Russia would not have invaded Ukraine under his presidency. Additionally, he claimed that could end the conflict within a month. Trump attributed the chaos of the U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan to emboldening Russia’s aggression in Ukraine. He also claimed that under his administration, sanctions effectively crippled Iran. He suggested this approach prevented regional conflicts like the Hamas attack on Israel, indicating a similar stance on Iran for the future.
The 2024 US Presidential Debate held on June 27th highlighted the differing foreign policy approaches of the candidates, with Trump advocating a more pragmatic stance compared to Biden’s internationalism. Trump also criticized Biden’s handling of the Paris Climate Agreement and defended his own tariff policies, despite economists warning that raising tariffs could damage U.S. trade relations.
Also See: Putin’s Gambit: Russia’s Foreign Policy in a Multipolar World
Conclusion
The first 2024 presidential debate between Biden and Trump was more of a chaotic spectacle than a constructive discussion. Both candidates struggled to present a compelling case for their presidency, leaving many Americans frustrated and disillusioned with their choices. The debate’s fact-checking revealed numerous inaccuracies and exaggerations from both sides, undermining their credibility. As the campaign continues, the challenge remains for either candidate to rise above the fray and offer a vision that resonates with the American electorate.
The views expressed in this article are the author’s own. They do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of the South Asia Times.
Simran Saeed Janjua
Simran Saeed Janjua
Simran Saeed Janjua is an International Relations Researcher from National Defense University Islamabad, currently serving as research intern at South Asia Times (SAT). Her areas of research interest include traditional and non traditional security issues and foreign policy analysis. She can be reached at simransaeedjanjua@gmail.com and on X (formerly Twitter) @i_simranjanjua.
Recent
The Nobel Peace Prize or War Prize? A History of Controversial Laureates
Far from being an impartial recognition of pacifism, the Nobel Peace Prize’s legacy is marred by controversial laureates whose actions have been linked to immense violence. The prize is not a universal arbiter of peace but a political instrument reflecting a Western-centric worldview, rewarding figures who align with its geopolitical interests, regardless of the blood on their hands.
Eighty Years Later: Is the United Nations Becoming the League of Nations 2.0?
Eighty years after the UN’s creation to “save succeeding generations from war,” the organization stands at a breaking point. With veto paralysis, waning U.S. commitment, and global disillusionment, is the UN becoming the very institution it replaced—the League of Nations 2.0?
Geopolitics, Journalism, and the Anatomy of a False Narrative
A recent Financial Times story claimed Pakistan was pitching a new Arabian Sea port to the US Built on anonymous sources and logical flaws, the report was quietly corrected. This article dissects how the flimsy reporting was weaponized by domestic and regional actors to push a false narrative, revealing more about their political agendas than Pakistan’s foreign policy.
The Promises and Perils of the New Gaza Plan
A new Gaza peace plan by Donald Trump has international backing and a surprising partial acceptance from Hamas. However, its journey toward lasting peace is threatened by critical deal-breakers and the unresolved core question of Palestinian political sovereignty.
Pakistan’s Path to Innovation through CERN Partnership
Pakistan’s growing partnership with CERN highlights its rising role in global science and technology. As the first South Asian state to become an associate member, Pakistan is advancing research, training young scientists, and opening doors for high-tech industry and innovation through its collaboration with the world’s leading particle physics center.