Yunus-Modi Meeting Uncertain as India Finalizes BIMSTEC Schedule

Indian PM Modi to attend BIMSTEC Summit in Bangkok; no bilateral meeting with Bangladesh’s Yunus confirmed yet. [Image via The Daily Star]

India’s External Affairs ministry today announced that Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi will be visiting Bangkok for the sixth BIMSTEC Summit. However, no mention of a bilateral meeting with Prof Yunus, the chief adviser of Bangladesh, was made.

The only bilateral meeting Modi will have during his stay, according to a readout issued by the ministry, is with the Thai Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra on April 3, a day before the Summit.

From Thailand, Modi will travel to Colombo on a state visit from April 4 to 6 at the invitation of Sri Lankan President Anura Kumara Disanayaka.

Bangladesh had written to India requesting a bilateral meeting between Yunus and Modi at the BIMSTEC summit. Indian External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar said that Dhaka’s request was “under consideration”.

Also See: China’s Executive Vice Premier Ding Xuexiang Meets Yunus

Yunus, who took on the role of chief adviser in August last year, is yet to meet Modi bilaterally.

Formed in 1997, the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral, Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) comprises Bangladesh, India, Myanmar, Sri Lanka, Thailand, Nepal and Bhutan.

This would be the first in-person meeting of the BIMSTEC leaders since 2018. The last BIMSTEC Summit was held at Colombo in March 2022 in a virtual format.

The BIMSTEC leaders are also expected to discuss various institution and capacity-building measures to enhance collaboration within the seven-nation regional grouping’s framework.

This news is sourced from The Daily Star and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

The Afghan Crucible

The Afghan Crucible

Recent reporting underscores Afghanistan’s transformation into a strategic hub for transnational jihadist networks. Far from being a localized security problem, the Afghan landscape now functions as an ideological, logistical, and digital anchor linking extremist affiliates across Africa, Southeast Asia, and beyond, signaling the collapse of regional containment and the rise of a globalized threat architecture.

Read More »
Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Economic Statecraft and the New Geography of Power in Regional Politics

Strategic competition has moved beyond decisive wars toward a subtler synthesis of economic leverage, proxy networks, and calibrated force. Infrastructure, finance, and trade routes now function as instruments of power, quietly reshaping regional orders while preserving the façade of restraint. In this environment, security is no longer confined to the battlefield but embedded in supply chains, data networks, and development choices, forcing states to rethink deterrence, sovereignty, and resilience.

Read More »
The Manufacturing of a False Equivalence

The Manufacturing of a False Equivalence

As scrutiny mounts over the Taliban’s tolerance of TTP sanctuaries, Kabul has attempted to deflect blame by alleging that ISIS-K operates from Pakistan. This false equivalence ignores the historical origins of ISIS-K in eastern Afghanistan, its sustained campaign of violence against Pakistan, and verified intelligence showing that the group’s operational depth remains rooted inside Afghan territory.

Read More »
Healthcare as Statecraft in Taliban-Ruled Afghanistan

Healthcare as Statecraft in Taliban-Ruled Afghanistan

Afghanistan’s recent shift away from Pakistani pharmaceutical imports toward Indian suppliers marks a dangerous transformation of healthcare into a tool of geopolitical signaling. Framed as regulatory reform, this pivot reflects a broader biopolitical strategy in which access to medicine is subordinated to diplomatic recalibration, with profound ethical and humanitarian consequences for an already vulnerable population.

Read More »
The Taliban Regime and the 2025 Global CFT Framework

The Taliban Regime and the 2025 Global CFT Framework

Despite consolidating internal control and boosting revenues, the Taliban remain structurally incompatible with the 2025 global Counter-Terrorism Financing regime, as sanctions, militant linkages, and gender persecution block financial reintegration.

Read More »