Young Green Activists Blocked in India

What is happening?

The website for Fridays for Future (FFF) India, a student-led climate action movement inspired by 17-year-old Swedish activist Greta Thunberg, has been blocked.

The Delhi police also charged the group under an anti-terrorism law. After complaints by an environment minister that he got too many e-mails from the FFF regarding draft environment rules the government is seeking public responses for. After a public outcry, the police said the charge was \”inadvertently\” sent and filed a new one under the Information Technology Act.

Two other environment collectives also blocked were, Let India Breathe and There is no Earth B.

Response by environmentalists

All three green groups have been mobilizing people online in opposition to a draft Environment Impact Assessment (EIA) notification, which environmentalists oppose heavily. The website blocking and police charges are further obstructing democratic engagement, they say.

\”We feel let down by seeing the discourse stoop to this level. We want the government to be transparent, and together we can fix things. A fragile or polluted ecosystem will not make for a good business environment,\” said Mr. Yash Marwah, a Mumbai-based writer and member of Let India Breathe.

The crux of the conflict

The Environmental Impact Assessment was first notified in 1994, under India\’s Environment (Protection) Act, 1986. It provides a legal framework for safeguarding forests, rivers, the air, and soil from industrial and infrastructure activities that might access, use, or pollute them. Every industrial project is required to go through the EIA process and obtain environmental clearance before it initiates. The new 2020 rules involve less scrutiny. Approved projects will get clearance permits for longer durations. Moreover, projects that have violated environmental rules can continue operations after paying a fine. Activists fear that this will weaken already fragile environmental protections.

The present and the future

\”The 2020 draft is more regressive than the 2006 version it seeks to replace, and just wants to legalize destruction and pollution,\” said Ms. Bhavreen Khandari, who works closely with FFF. Moreover, the Delhi police said it lifted the suspensions on July 16. However, the websites are still inactive under some Internet service providers.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

When Insurgents Rule: The Taliban’s Crisis of Governance

The Taliban’s confrontation with Pakistan reveals a deeper failure at the heart of their rule: an insurgent movement incapable of governing the state it conquered. Bound by rigid ideology and fractured by internal rivalries, the Taliban have turned their military victory into a political and economic collapse, exposing the limits of ruling through insurgent logic.

Read More »
The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

The Great Unknotting: America’s Tech Break with China, and the Return of the American System

As the U.S. unwinds decades of technological interdependence with China, a new industrial and strategic order is emerging. Through selective decoupling, focused on chips, AI, and critical supply chains, Washington aims to restore domestic manufacturing, secure data sovereignty, and revive the Hamiltonian vision of national self-reliance. This is not isolationism but a recalibration of globalization on America’s terms.

Read More »
Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

Inside the Istanbul Talks: How Taliban Factionalism Killed a Peace Deal

The collapse of the Turkiye-hosted talks to address the TTP threat was not a diplomatic failure but a calculated act of sabotage from within the Taliban regime. Deep factional divides—between Kandahar, Kabul, and Khost blocs—turned mediation into chaos, as Kabul’s power players sought to use the TTP issue as leverage for U.S. re-engagement and financial relief. The episode exposed a regime too fractured and self-interested to act against terrorism or uphold sovereignty.

Read More »
The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The Indo-Afghan Arc: Rewriting Pakistan’s Strategic Geography

The deepening India-Afghanistan engagement marks a new strategic era in South Asia. Beneath the façade of humanitarian cooperation lies a calculated effort to constrict Pakistan’s strategic space, from intelligence leverage and soft power projection to potential encirclement on both eastern and western fronts. Drawing from the insights of Iqbal and Khushhal Khan Khattak, this analysis argues that Pakistan must reclaim its strategic selfhood, strengthen regional diplomacy, and transform its western border from a vulnerability into a vision of regional connectivity and stability.

Read More »
Pakistan’s rejection of a Taliban proposal to include the TTP in Turkey talks reaffirmed its sovereignty and refusal to legitimize terrorism.

Legitimacy, Agency, and the Illusion of Mediation

The recent talks in Turkey, attended by Afghan representatives, exposed the delicate politics of legitimacy and agency in Pakistan-Afghanistan relations. By rejecting the Taliban’s proposal to include the TTP, Pakistan safeguarded its sovereignty and avoided legitimizing a militant group as a political actor, preserving its authority and strategic narrative.

Read More »