WHO: Saudi Arabia Confirms $500 Million Pledge to GPEI to End Polio in Afghanistan, Pakistan

Saudi Arabia reaffirms its $500 Million pledge to GPEI, supporting polio eradication in Pakistan, Afghanistan amid funding shifts. [Image via Reuters/File]

Saudi Arabia has reaffirmed its $500 million pledge to the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI), the World Health Organization (WHO) announced on Monday. This substantial commitment, initially made in April 2024 during the World Economic Forum Special Meeting in Riyadh, aims to bolster efforts to eradicate wild polio and curb outbreaks of variant polio in Pakistan and Afghanistan.

The allocated funds will support the vaccination of approximately 370 million children annually, targeting the wild strain of the poliovirus that remains endemic in both countries. In 2024, Pakistan and Afghanistan collectively reported 99 cases of wild polio, underscoring the persistent challenge the virus poses in these regions. The GPEI has adjusted its eradication timeline, now aiming to eliminate wild polio by 2027 and address vaccine-derived polio by 2029, extending the previous 2026 deadline for both forms.

This renewed financial support from Saudi Arabia is pivotal, especially in light of recent global health funding shifts. The United States, historically a major contributor to the GPEI, accounting for 17% of its 2024-2025 budget, has announced its intention to withdraw from the WHO. This decision has raised concerns about potential funding gaps in critical health programs, including polio eradication efforts. WHO Director-General Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus emphasized the gravity of this move, stating that the suspension of U.S. foreign aid contributions significantly impacts global health initiatives targeting diseases like HIV, polio, mpox, and avian flu.

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia’s commitment not only addresses immediate financial needs but also reinforces global solidarity in the fight against polio. H.E. Dr. Abdullah Al Rabeeah, Supervisor General of the King Salman Humanitarian Aid & Relief Centre (KSrelief), highlighted the importance of this initiative, noting that the Kingdom’s contribution will protect vulnerable children today, ensuring future generations can live free from this preventable disease.

Also See: Polio Immunisation Campaign in Pakistan: Saving Future

The GPEI, a public-private partnership that includes national governments, WHO, Rotary International, the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, UNICEF, the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, has been instrumental in reducing polio cases by over 99% since its inception in 1988. However, challenges persist due to humanitarian crises, political instability, and vaccine misinformation, particularly in regions where polio remains endemic. The Saudi pledge is a significant step toward overcoming these obstacles and achieving a polio-free world.

In summary, the reaffirmation Saudi Arabia of its $500 million pledge to the GPEI exemplifies a robust commitment to global health and the eradication of polio. This support is especially crucial given recent funding uncertainties and underscores the importance of collaborative international efforts to combat preventable diseases.

This news is sourced from Reuters and is intended for informational purposes only.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

An analysis of Qatar’s neutrality, Al Jazeera’s framing of Pakistan, and how narrative diplomacy shapes mediation and regional security in South Asia.

Qatar’s Dubious Neutrality and the Narrative Campaign Against Pakistan

Qatar’s role in South Asia illustrates how mediation and media narratives can quietly converge into instruments of influence. Through Al Jazeera’s selective framing of Pakistan’s security challenges and Doha’s unbalanced facilitation with the Taliban, neutrality risks becoming a performative posture rather than a principled practice. Mediation that avoids accountability does not resolve conflict, it entrenches it.

Read More »
An analysis of how Qatar’s mediation shifted from dialogue to patronage, legitimizing the Taliban and Hamas while eroding global counterterrorism norms.

From Dialogue to Patronage: How Qatar Mainstreamed Radical Movements Under the Banner of Mediation

Qatar’s diplomacy has long been framed as pragmatic engagement, but its mediation model has increasingly blurred into political patronage. By hosting and legitimizing groups such as the Taliban and Hamas without enforceable conditions, Doha has helped normalize armed movements in international politics, weakening counterterrorism norms and reshaping regional stability.

Read More »
AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI, Extremism, and the Weaponization of Hate: Islamophobia in India

AI is no longer a neutral tool in India’s digital space. A growing body of research shows how artificial intelligence is being deliberately weaponized to mass-produce Islamophobic narratives, normalize harassment, and amplify Hindutva extremism. As online hate increasingly spills into real-world violence, India’s AI-driven propaganda ecosystem raises urgent questions about accountability, democracy, and the future of pluralism.

Read More »
AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s Threat to China: Pathways Through Al-Qaeda’s Global Network

AQAP’s threat against China marks a shift from rhetoric to execution, rooted in Al-Qaeda’s decentralized global architecture. By using Afghanistan as a coordination hub and relying on AQIS, TTP, and Uyghur militants of the Turkistan Islamic Party as local enablers, the threat is designed to be carried out far beyond Yemen. From CPEC projects in Pakistan to Chinese interests in Central Asia and Africa, the networked nature of Al-Qaeda allows a geographically dispersed yet strategically aligned campaign against Beijing.

Read More »
The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The Enduring Consequences of America’s Exit from Afghanistan

The 2021 US withdrawal from Afghanistan was more than the end of a long war, it was a poorly executed exit that triggered the rapid collapse of the Afghan state. The fall of Kabul, the Abbey Gate attack, and the return of militant groups exposed serious gaps in planning and coordination.

Read More »