Violence Grips Afghanistan Ahead of Turkish Peace Conference

Thes the 1st May deadline for foreign troop withdrawal is getting closer. Subsequently, the situation of peace in Afghanistan is becoming volatile. The deadline is part of a February 2020 agreement the United States signed with the Taliban. The deal signalled an end to the longest war in U.S. history.

The upcoming peace talks in Turkey, which would have commenced from the 16th of April are surrounded by confusion. The 10-day talks are expected to be a watershed moment for perpetual Afghan peace.

However, Afghan forces and Taliban have engaged in rising hostilities before the peace conference. The respective parties have claimed to inflict serious damages.

100 insurgent fighters killed, claims Afghan Defense Ministry

The Afghan ministry of defence stated that the Afghan army commanders have also evicted the Taliban from the Arghandab district. The district in southern Kandahar province had been occupied by the insurgents for months.

45 Killed of Afghan forces, claims Taliban spokesman

According to Taliban spokesman Zabihullah Mujahid, a group of insurgents staged \”tactical attacks on the convoy following the car bombing\”. He also claimed that the Taliban have  \”killed/wounded up to 45 Afghan troops\”.

The Taliban have also escalated their attacks against security forces in districts such as Herat, Ghor, Ghazni, Helmand, and Kabul.

Intended skirmish?

Such hostilities just a few days before a seminal peace dialogue raise a lot of questions. Some analysts claim it to be a pressure tact by militant groups to achieve more leverage in peace talks. The two-decade war has devastated the economic potential of Afghanistan. This results in a void for militant groups that further damage any initiative for peace.

News Desk

Your trusted source for insightful journalism. Stay informed with our compelling coverage of global affairs, business, technology, and more.

Recent

A critical analysis of Drop Site News’ report alleging a UK–Pakistan “swap deal,” exposing its reliance on anonymous sources, partisan framing, and legally impossible claims.

Anonymous Sources, Big Claims, Thin Ground

A recent Drop Site News report claims a covert UK–Pakistan exchange of convicted sex offenders for political dissidents. But a closer look shows the story rests on hearsay, anonymous insiders, and a narrative shaped more by partisan loyalties than evidence. From misrepresenting legally declared propagandists as persecuted critics to ignoring the legal impossibility of such a swap, this report illustrates how modern journalism can slip into activism. When sensational claims outrun facts and legality, credibility collapses, and so does the line between holding power accountable and manufacturing a story.

Read More »
A sharp critique of Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent evasive remarks on the TTP, exposing Taliban hypocrisy and Afghan complicity in cross-border militancy.

Zabihullah Mujahid’s Bizarre Statement on TTP: A Lesson in Hypocrisy and Evasion

Zabihullah Mujahid’s recent statement dismissing the TTP as Pakistan’s “internal issue” and claiming Pashto lacks the word “terrorist” is a glaring act of evasion. By downplaying a UN-listed militant group hosted on Afghan soil, the Taliban spokesperson attempts to deflect responsibility, despite overwhelming evidence of TTP sanctuaries, leadership, and operations in Afghanistan. His remarks reveal not linguistic nuance, but calculated hypocrisy and political convenience.

Read More »
Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Beyond the Rhetoric: What Muttaqi’s Address Reveals About Afghan Policy

Interim Foreign Minister Amir Khan Muttaqi’s recent address sought to reframe Afghanistan’s strained ties with Pakistan through a narrative of victimhood and denial. From dismissing cross-border militancy to overstating economic resilience, his claims contradict on-ground realities and historical patterns. A closer examination reveals strategic deflection rather than accountability, with serious implications for regional peace and security.

Read More »
We Want Deliverance

We Want Deliverance

Political mobilization in South Asia is not rooted in policy or institutions but in a profound yearning for deliverance. From Modi’s civilizational aura in India to Imran Khan’s revolutionary moral narrative in Pakistan, voters seek not managers of the state but messianic figures who promise total transformation. This “Messiah Complex” fuels a cycle of charismatic rise, institutional erosion, and eventual democratic breakdown, a pattern embedded in the region’s political psychology and historical imagination.

Read More »